3-Dimensional accuracy of navigation-guided bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

The transfer of a virtual orthognathic surgical plan to the patient still relies on the use of occlusal splints, which have limitations for vertical positioning of the maxilla. The use of real-time navigation has been proposed to enhance surgical accuracy. This systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42024497588) aimed to investigate if surgical navigation can improve the three-dimensional accuracy of orthognathic surgery. The inclusion criteria were orthognathic surgery, use of intra-operative navigation and quantitative assessment of surgical accuracy. The exclusion criteria were non-bimaxillary orthognathic surgeries, non-clinical studies, studies without post-operative 3D analysis and publications not in the English language. A search of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library generated 940 records, of which 12 were found relevant. Risk of bias was assessed done using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist Tool. Among the included studies, there were nine of observational character and three randomized control studies (RCTs). All studies demonstrated promising outcomes with reported good surgical accuracy within a 2 mm difference between the planned and post-surgical result. Meta-analysis of two RCTs was carried out and results were in favor of surgical navigation with a total odds ratio of 4.44 [2.11, 9.37] and an overall effect outcome of Z = 3.92 (p < 0.0001). Navigation was up to 0.60 mm more accurate than occlusal wafers only (p < 0.001). However, there were variations in the application of surgical navigation and methods of analysis, leading to a heterogenous data set. Future studies should focus on standardized protocols and analysis methods to further validate the use of surgical navigation in orthognathic surgery. Despite some limitations, surgical navigation shows potential as a valuable tool in improving the accuracy of orthognathic surgery.