Use of artificial intelligence to support prehospital traumatic injury care: A scoping review

Jake Toy DO, MS, Jonathan Warren MD, Kelsey Wilhelm MD, Brant Putnam MD, Denise Whitfield MD, Marianne Gausche-Hill MD, Nichole Bosson MD, MPH, Ross Donaldson MD, Shira Schlesinger MD, Tabitha Cheng MD, Craig Goolsby MD, MEd
{"title":"Use of artificial intelligence to support prehospital traumatic injury care: A scoping review","authors":"Jake Toy DO, MS,&nbsp;Jonathan Warren MD,&nbsp;Kelsey Wilhelm MD,&nbsp;Brant Putnam MD,&nbsp;Denise Whitfield MD,&nbsp;Marianne Gausche-Hill MD,&nbsp;Nichole Bosson MD, MPH,&nbsp;Ross Donaldson MD,&nbsp;Shira Schlesinger MD,&nbsp;Tabitha Cheng MD,&nbsp;Craig Goolsby MD, MEd","doi":"10.1002/emp2.13251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Artificial intelligence (AI) has transformative potential to support prehospital clinicians, emergency physicians, and trauma surgeons in acute traumatic injury care. This scoping review examines the literature evaluating AI models using prehospital features to support early traumatic injury care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a systematic search in August 2023 of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. Two independent reviewers screened titles/abstracts, with a third reviewer for adjudication, followed by a full-text analysis. We included original research and conference presentations evaluating AI models—machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and natural language processing (NLP)—that used prehospital features or features available immediately upon emergency department arrival. Review articles were excluded. The same investigators extracted data and systematically categorized outcomes to ensure consistency and transparency. We calculated kappa for interrater reliability and descriptive statistics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We identified 1050 unique publications, with 49 meeting inclusion criteria after title and abstract review (kappa 0.58) and full-text review. Publications increased annually from 2 in 2007 to 10 in 2022. Geographic analysis revealed a 61% focus on data from the United States. Studies were predominantly retrospective (88%), used local (45%) or national level (41%) data, focused on adults only (59%) or did not specify adults or pediatrics (27%), and 57% encompassed both blunt and penetrating injury mechanisms. The majority used machine learning (88%) alone or in conjunction with DL or NLP, and the top three algorithms used were support vector machine, logistic regression, and random forest. The most common study objectives were to predict the need for critical care and life-saving interventions (29%), assist in triage (22%), and predict survival (20%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>A small but growing body of literature described AI models based on prehospital features that may support decisions made by dispatchers, Emergency Medical Services clinicians, and trauma teams in early traumatic injury care.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73967,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11372236/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/emp2.13251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Artificial intelligence (AI) has transformative potential to support prehospital clinicians, emergency physicians, and trauma surgeons in acute traumatic injury care. This scoping review examines the literature evaluating AI models using prehospital features to support early traumatic injury care.

Methods

We conducted a systematic search in August 2023 of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. Two independent reviewers screened titles/abstracts, with a third reviewer for adjudication, followed by a full-text analysis. We included original research and conference presentations evaluating AI models—machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and natural language processing (NLP)—that used prehospital features or features available immediately upon emergency department arrival. Review articles were excluded. The same investigators extracted data and systematically categorized outcomes to ensure consistency and transparency. We calculated kappa for interrater reliability and descriptive statistics.

Results

We identified 1050 unique publications, with 49 meeting inclusion criteria after title and abstract review (kappa 0.58) and full-text review. Publications increased annually from 2 in 2007 to 10 in 2022. Geographic analysis revealed a 61% focus on data from the United States. Studies were predominantly retrospective (88%), used local (45%) or national level (41%) data, focused on adults only (59%) or did not specify adults or pediatrics (27%), and 57% encompassed both blunt and penetrating injury mechanisms. The majority used machine learning (88%) alone or in conjunction with DL or NLP, and the top three algorithms used were support vector machine, logistic regression, and random forest. The most common study objectives were to predict the need for critical care and life-saving interventions (29%), assist in triage (22%), and predict survival (20%).

Conclusions

A small but growing body of literature described AI models based on prehospital features that may support decisions made by dispatchers, Emergency Medical Services clinicians, and trauma teams in early traumatic injury care.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用人工智能支持院前创伤护理:范围综述。
背景:人工智能(AI)在支持院前临床医生、急诊内科医生和创伤外科医生进行急性创伤救治方面具有变革潜力。本范围综述研究了评估利用院前特征支持早期创伤救治的人工智能模型的文献:我们于 2023 年 8 月对 PubMed、Embase 和 Web of Science 进行了系统检索。两位独立审稿人对标题/摘要进行了筛选,第三位审稿人进行了裁定,随后进行了全文分析。我们纳入了评估人工智能模型(机器学习 (ML)、深度学习 (DL) 和自然语言处理 (NLP))的原创研究和会议报告,这些模型使用了院前特征或急诊科到达后立即可用的特征。综述文章被排除在外。同一研究人员提取数据并对结果进行系统分类,以确保一致性和透明度。我们计算了计算者间可靠性的卡帕(kappa)和描述性统计:我们确定了 1050 篇独特的出版物,经过标题和摘要审查(kappa 0.58)和全文审查,有 49 篇符合纳入标准。论文数量从 2007 年的 2 篇逐年增加到 2022 年的 10 篇。地域分析显示,61%的数据集中在美国。研究主要是回顾性的(88%),使用地方(45%)或国家级(41%)数据,仅关注成人(59%)或未指明成人或儿科(27%),57%的研究包含钝性和穿透性损伤机制。大多数研究单独或与 DL 或 NLP 结合使用了机器学习(88%),使用最多的三种算法是支持向量机、逻辑回归和随机森林。最常见的研究目标是预测重症监护和救生干预的需求(29%)、协助分流(22%)和预测存活率(20%):基于院前特征的人工智能模型虽然数量不多,但却在不断增加,这些模型可为调度员、急救医疗服务临床医生和创伤团队在早期创伤救治中做出的决策提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Passage of vaginal tissue in an non-pregnant adolescent A woman with sudden unilateral vision loss Factors influencing emergency medicine worker shift satisfaction: A rapid assessment of wellness in the emergency department The Dunning‒Kruger effect in resident predicted and actual performance on the American Board of Emergency Medicine in-training examination A multicenter randomized control trial: Point-of-care syndromic assessment versus standard testing in urgent care center patients with acute respiratory illness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1