Comparison of GPR signals over simulated clandestine graves with domestic pigs (Sus Scrofa domesticus) and human remains.

Aidan Armstrong, Kennedy O Doro, Katrina Cristino, Agathe Ribéreau-Gayon, Shari L Forbes, William T D Wadsworth, Carl-Georg Bank
{"title":"Comparison of GPR signals over simulated clandestine graves with domestic pigs (Sus Scrofa domesticus) and human remains.","authors":"Aidan Armstrong, Kennedy O Doro, Katrina Cristino, Agathe Ribéreau-Gayon, Shari L Forbes, William T D Wadsworth, Carl-Georg Bank","doi":"10.1111/1556-4029.15622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies assessing the use of ground-penetrating radar (GPR) for locating unmarked human graves commonly use pigs as proxies, with recent concerns about the adequacy of pigs as substitutes for humans. Also, there is little agreement on how to identify and describe GPR signals associated with graves. Hence, this project's aim is to compare GPR signals acquired over simulated clandestine graves with pig and human remains. We established human, pig, and control graves at the REST[ES] human decomposition facility in May 2022 and monitored the graves over 17 months using a 250 MHz antenna GPR system. Our results showed the presence of perturbed and V-shaped reflectors, diffraction hyperbolas, and reflectors with amplitude loss at depth between 0.6 and 0.75 m in the radargram for graves with human and pig remains. We corroborate recent studies which concluded that the use of proxies is a viable alternative to human cadavers. The observed radar signatures were classified into five key patterns, which are characteristic of similar data collected with 250 MHz above graves reported in the literature. These classes are: V-shaped dipping reflections from grave walls (class A), small hyperbolic reflections superimposed onto a near-linear reflector (class B), hyperbolic reflections from remains within the grave (class C), new high-amplitude reflection patterns (class D) and significant loss or interruption of reflections (class E). Our proposed classification can help streamline future investigations where the goal is to interpret burials within large GPR datasets and provide language to communicate these results to the broader scientific community.</p>","PeriodicalId":94080,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.15622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies assessing the use of ground-penetrating radar (GPR) for locating unmarked human graves commonly use pigs as proxies, with recent concerns about the adequacy of pigs as substitutes for humans. Also, there is little agreement on how to identify and describe GPR signals associated with graves. Hence, this project's aim is to compare GPR signals acquired over simulated clandestine graves with pig and human remains. We established human, pig, and control graves at the REST[ES] human decomposition facility in May 2022 and monitored the graves over 17 months using a 250 MHz antenna GPR system. Our results showed the presence of perturbed and V-shaped reflectors, diffraction hyperbolas, and reflectors with amplitude loss at depth between 0.6 and 0.75 m in the radargram for graves with human and pig remains. We corroborate recent studies which concluded that the use of proxies is a viable alternative to human cadavers. The observed radar signatures were classified into five key patterns, which are characteristic of similar data collected with 250 MHz above graves reported in the literature. These classes are: V-shaped dipping reflections from grave walls (class A), small hyperbolic reflections superimposed onto a near-linear reflector (class B), hyperbolic reflections from remains within the grave (class C), new high-amplitude reflection patterns (class D) and significant loss or interruption of reflections (class E). Our proposed classification can help streamline future investigations where the goal is to interpret burials within large GPR datasets and provide language to communicate these results to the broader scientific community.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家猪(Sus Scrofa domesticus)和人类遗骸在模拟地下坟墓上的 GPR 信号比较。
评估使用探地雷达(GPR)定位无标记人类坟墓的研究通常使用猪作为替代物,但最近人们对猪是否足以替代人类表示担忧。此外,在如何识别和描述与坟墓相关的 GPR 信号方面也鲜有共识。因此,本项目的目的是比较在模拟地下坟墓上采集到的猪和人类遗骸的 GPR 信号。我们于 2022 年 5 月在 REST[ES] 人类分解设施建立了人类、猪和对照坟墓,并使用 250 MHz 天线 GPR 系统对坟墓进行了长达 17 个月的监测。我们的研究结果表明,在埋有人类和猪类遗骸的坟墓的雷达图中,存在扰动和 V 形反射体、衍射双曲线,以及深度在 0.6 至 0.75 米之间的振幅损失反射体。我们证实了近期研究的结论,即使用代用体是替代人类尸体的可行方法。观测到的雷达信号被分为五种主要模式,这些模式与文献中报道的在坟墓上方用 250 MHz 采集到的类似数据具有相同的特征。这些类别是来自墓壁的 V 形倾斜反射(A 类)、叠加在近线性反射体上的小双曲线反射(B 类)、来自墓穴内遗骸的双曲线反射(C 类)、新的高振幅反射模式(D 类)以及反射的明显损失或中断(E 类)。我们提出的分类方法有助于简化未来的调查工作,其目标是解释大型 GPR 数据集中的墓葬,并提供向更广泛的科学界传达这些结果的语言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Acute aconitine poisoning resulting from the ingestion of medicinal liquor. Comparison of GPR signals over simulated clandestine graves with domestic pigs (Sus Scrofa domesticus) and human remains. Correction to "A study of DNA transfers onto plastic packets placed in personal bags". Two simplified tooth sample preparation methods for conventional laboratory and RapidHIT™ ID workflows. Visual detection and enhancement of alterations in questioned documents by Mueller polarimetry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1