Rapid review: Ten ways to improve support for minoritised informal adult carers at local government policy level to redress inequality

IF 2.2 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Public Health in Practice Pub Date : 2024-08-26 DOI:10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100543
A. Barnes , F. Phillips , K. Pickett , A.J. Haider , J. Robinson-Joyce , S. Ahmed
{"title":"Rapid review: Ten ways to improve support for minoritised informal adult carers at local government policy level to redress inequality","authors":"A. Barnes ,&nbsp;F. Phillips ,&nbsp;K. Pickett ,&nbsp;A.J. Haider ,&nbsp;J. Robinson-Joyce ,&nbsp;S. Ahmed","doi":"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To rapidly identify and summarise evidence on key factors that affect access to support for minoritised informal adult carers which could be addressed at the level of local government policy-making.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Rapid evidence review.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A rapid umbrella review was undertaken of systematic reviews of qualitative, quantitative and/or mixed method studies. Systematic reviews were identified through database searches (Medline, Cochrane, Proquest), key author searching, referrals by experts (n = 2) of key reviews, and citation and reference checking of identified reviews in September–October 2023. Systematic review evidence was supplemented with grey literature identified by practitioners (n = 2) as locally-relevant. Data was extracted directly into a table and findings synthesised narratively by theme.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Many factors were identified as affecting access to support for minoritised unpaid adult carers, including: inattention to socio-cultural diversity; issues of representation, racism and discrimination; and socio-economic inequality. Factors were themed around ten areas for local action, including: the importance of recognising intersectional disadvantage and diversity; ensuring support is socio-culturally appropriate; paying attention to gendered hierarchies in service design; identifying and ‘designing out’ racism and discrimination; addressing exclusions that minoritised carers with additional communication needs face; mitigating socio-economic inequality; and taking a ‘whole system’ approach that improves integration, routine data collection and support service evaluation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We identified ten potential ways in which inequalities in support for minoritised unpaid adult carers could be addressed locally. Although the existing evidence base is limited, these ten areas could usefully be targeted for further investigation in research and within local policy development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34141,"journal":{"name":"Public Health in Practice","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100543"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535224000806/pdfft?md5=646a799c332571fe4cca2e552a03f779&pid=1-s2.0-S2666535224000806-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535224000806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To rapidly identify and summarise evidence on key factors that affect access to support for minoritised informal adult carers which could be addressed at the level of local government policy-making.

Study design

Rapid evidence review.

Methods

A rapid umbrella review was undertaken of systematic reviews of qualitative, quantitative and/or mixed method studies. Systematic reviews were identified through database searches (Medline, Cochrane, Proquest), key author searching, referrals by experts (n = 2) of key reviews, and citation and reference checking of identified reviews in September–October 2023. Systematic review evidence was supplemented with grey literature identified by practitioners (n = 2) as locally-relevant. Data was extracted directly into a table and findings synthesised narratively by theme.

Results

Many factors were identified as affecting access to support for minoritised unpaid adult carers, including: inattention to socio-cultural diversity; issues of representation, racism and discrimination; and socio-economic inequality. Factors were themed around ten areas for local action, including: the importance of recognising intersectional disadvantage and diversity; ensuring support is socio-culturally appropriate; paying attention to gendered hierarchies in service design; identifying and ‘designing out’ racism and discrimination; addressing exclusions that minoritised carers with additional communication needs face; mitigating socio-economic inequality; and taking a ‘whole system’ approach that improves integration, routine data collection and support service evaluation.

Conclusions

We identified ten potential ways in which inequalities in support for minoritised unpaid adult carers could be addressed locally. Although the existing evidence base is limited, these ten areas could usefully be targeted for further investigation in research and within local policy development.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
快速审查:在地方政府政策层面改善对少数群体非正式成年照顾者支持的十种方法,以纠正不平等现象
研究设计快速证据综述。方法对定性、定量和/或混合方法研究的系统综述进行快速综述。通过数据库搜索(Medline、Cochrane、Proquest)、关键作者搜索、专家(n = 2)推荐关键综述,以及对 2023 年 9 月至 10 月期间确定的综述进行引文和参考文献检查,确定了系统综述。在系统综述证据的基础上,补充了由从业人员(2 人)确定的与当地相关的灰色文献。数据被直接提取到表格中,研究结果按主题进行了叙述性综合。结果发现许多因素会影响少数群体无偿成年照护者获得支持,包括:对社会文化多样性的忽视;代表性、种族主义和歧视问题;以及社会经济不平等。这些因素围绕十个地方行动领域展开,其中包括:认识到交叉弱势和多样性的重要性;确保提供的支持与社会文化相适应;在服务设计中关注性别等级;识别并 "设计出 "种族主义和歧视;解决有额外交流需求的少数群体照护者所面临的排斥问题;缓解社会经济不平等;以及采取 "全系统 "方法,改善整合、日常数据收集和支持服务评估。结论我们发现了十种潜在的方法,可以在当地解决少数群体无偿成年照护者在支持方面的不平等问题。虽然现有的证据基础有限,但这十个领域可以作为研究和地方政策制定中进一步调查的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health in Practice
Public Health in Practice Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
117
审稿时长
71 days
期刊最新文献
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the dispensing of systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) in Ireland: A population based study Association between child marriage and high blood glucose level in women: A birth cohort analysis Reaching national Covid-19 vaccination targets whilst decreasing inequalities in vaccine uptake: Public health teams' challenges in supporting disadvantaged populations Syndemic geographic patterns of cancer risk in a health-deprived area of England Young, deprived women are more at risk of testing positive for Chlamydia trachomatis: Results from a cross-sectional multicentre study in French health examination centres
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1