{"title":"Limited sensitivity of Antarctic GIA mass change estimates to lateral viscosity variations","authors":"Yoshiya Irie , Jun’ichi Okuno , Koichiro Doi , Takeshige Ishiwa , Yoichi Fukuda","doi":"10.1016/j.jog.2024.102047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) has revealed spatiotemporal mass changes in the Antarctic Ice Sheet. However, GRACE data must be corrected for the gravity changes due to glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA). Here we investigate the sensitivity of GIA-induced gravity changes in Antarctica to the lithospheric thickness and upper mantle viscosity using a one-dimensional (1-D) model that assumes a radially varying Earth structure. The sensitivity is assessed using several Antarctic ice-history models that have been widely used to correct GRACE data. The results indicate a trade-off between lithospheric thickness and upper mantle viscosity in evaluating the Antarctic GIA correction. This trade-off exists for all ice-history models; however, the reason for the trade-off differs among models. Furthermore, since there is a sharp contrast in the Earth structure between West and East Antarctica, the adopted ice histories are separated into West and East Antarctic components to examine their contributions to the Antarctic GIA correction. We consider 1-D Earth structures that are averaged from the seismically derived three-dimensional Earth structure for West and East Antarctica. These results indicate that the contributions of the East and West Antarctic loads do not significantly affect the GIA corrections for the West and East Antarctic regions, respectively, and that the trade-off between lithospheric thickness and upper mantle viscosity results in minimal divergence in the assessment of the Antarctic GIA correction between the averaged Earth models of West and East Antarctica. Therefore, the contrast in Earth structure beneath Antarctica may have a limited effect on the ice-mass change estimates for the entire Antarctic Ice Sheet.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54823,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodynamics","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 102047"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264370724000309","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) has revealed spatiotemporal mass changes in the Antarctic Ice Sheet. However, GRACE data must be corrected for the gravity changes due to glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA). Here we investigate the sensitivity of GIA-induced gravity changes in Antarctica to the lithospheric thickness and upper mantle viscosity using a one-dimensional (1-D) model that assumes a radially varying Earth structure. The sensitivity is assessed using several Antarctic ice-history models that have been widely used to correct GRACE data. The results indicate a trade-off between lithospheric thickness and upper mantle viscosity in evaluating the Antarctic GIA correction. This trade-off exists for all ice-history models; however, the reason for the trade-off differs among models. Furthermore, since there is a sharp contrast in the Earth structure between West and East Antarctica, the adopted ice histories are separated into West and East Antarctic components to examine their contributions to the Antarctic GIA correction. We consider 1-D Earth structures that are averaged from the seismically derived three-dimensional Earth structure for West and East Antarctica. These results indicate that the contributions of the East and West Antarctic loads do not significantly affect the GIA corrections for the West and East Antarctic regions, respectively, and that the trade-off between lithospheric thickness and upper mantle viscosity results in minimal divergence in the assessment of the Antarctic GIA correction between the averaged Earth models of West and East Antarctica. Therefore, the contrast in Earth structure beneath Antarctica may have a limited effect on the ice-mass change estimates for the entire Antarctic Ice Sheet.
重力恢复与气候实验(GRACE)揭示了南极冰盖的时空质量变化。然而,GRACE 数据必须对冰川等静力调整(GIA)引起的重力变化进行校正。在此,我们使用假定地球结构径向变化的一维(1-D)模型,研究了冰川等静力调整引起的南极洲重力变化对岩石圈厚度和上地幔粘度的敏感性。利用广泛用于修正 GRACE 数据的几个南极冰史模型对该敏感性进行了评估。结果表明,在评估南极 GIA 校正时,岩石圈厚度和上地幔粘度之间存在权衡。所有冰史模型都存在这种权衡;但是,不同模型权衡的原因各不相同。此外,由于南极洲西部和东部的地球结构存在鲜明对比,我们将所采用的冰历史分为南极洲西部和东部两个部分,以研究它们对南极 GIA 校正的贡献。我们考虑了从地震得出的南极洲西部和东部三维地球结构平均得出的一维地球结构。这些结果表明,南极东部和西部载荷的贡献对南极西部和东部地区的 GIA 校正分别没有显著影响,岩石圈厚度和上地幔粘度之间的权衡导致南极西部和东部平均地球模型对南极 GIA 校正的评估差异极小。因此,南极洲下方地球结构的对比可能对整个南极冰原的冰量变化估计影响有限。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Geodynamics is an international and interdisciplinary forum for the publication of results and discussions of solid earth research in geodetic, geophysical, geological and geochemical geodynamics, with special emphasis on the large scale processes involved.