Impact of frequency of spaced retrieval using repeat testing on asthma pharmacotherapy knowledge retention

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1016/j.cptl.2024.102172
Kaitlin M. Alexander , Cary Mobley , Bradley Phillips , Carinda Feild , Lindsey M. Childs-Kean , Janel Soucie , Michelle Z. Farland
{"title":"Impact of frequency of spaced retrieval using repeat testing on asthma pharmacotherapy knowledge retention","authors":"Kaitlin M. Alexander ,&nbsp;Cary Mobley ,&nbsp;Bradley Phillips ,&nbsp;Carinda Feild ,&nbsp;Lindsey M. Childs-Kean ,&nbsp;Janel Soucie ,&nbsp;Michelle Z. Farland","doi":"10.1016/j.cptl.2024.102172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>”Test-enhanced learning\" is a strategy utilized to impact knowledge retention. This study aimed to assess the effect of the frequency of spaced retrieval using repeat testing on knowledge depreciation in a Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) Program.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study randomly assigned second-year pharmacy students to one of three retrieval practice groups: (1) two retrieval practice assessments (2 and 4 months after the course), (2) one retrieval practice assessment (4 months after the course), or (3) no retrieval practice. A final assessment was administered to all participants 6 months after the course. The retrieval assessments and final assessment consisted of five multiple-choice questions on asthma pharmacotherapy.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 94 participants were included in the study, with 32 in Group 1 and 31 in both Groups 2 and 3. All three groups performed similarly on the final assessment regardless of the frequency of spaced retrieval. While Group 1 scored numerically higher than Group 2 on the 4-month retrieval practice assessment and did not impact performance on the final assessment. In Group 1, final assessment scores were decreased compared to the two previous retrieval assessments.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Regardless of the frequency of spaced retrieval following the academic course where asthma pharmacotherapy was initially learned, retrieval practice using multiple choice assessments, with the gap times of this study, did not impact asthma pharmacotherapy knowledge depreciation among second-year student pharmacists.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47501,"journal":{"name":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","volume":"16 12","pages":"Article 102172"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877129724002041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

”Test-enhanced learning" is a strategy utilized to impact knowledge retention. This study aimed to assess the effect of the frequency of spaced retrieval using repeat testing on knowledge depreciation in a Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) Program.

Methods

The study randomly assigned second-year pharmacy students to one of three retrieval practice groups: (1) two retrieval practice assessments (2 and 4 months after the course), (2) one retrieval practice assessment (4 months after the course), or (3) no retrieval practice. A final assessment was administered to all participants 6 months after the course. The retrieval assessments and final assessment consisted of five multiple-choice questions on asthma pharmacotherapy.

Results

In total, 94 participants were included in the study, with 32 in Group 1 and 31 in both Groups 2 and 3. All three groups performed similarly on the final assessment regardless of the frequency of spaced retrieval. While Group 1 scored numerically higher than Group 2 on the 4-month retrieval practice assessment and did not impact performance on the final assessment. In Group 1, final assessment scores were decreased compared to the two previous retrieval assessments.

Conclusion

Regardless of the frequency of spaced retrieval following the academic course where asthma pharmacotherapy was initially learned, retrieval practice using multiple choice assessments, with the gap times of this study, did not impact asthma pharmacotherapy knowledge depreciation among second-year student pharmacists.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用重复测试进行间隔检索的频率对哮喘药物治疗知识保持率的影响
目标 "测试强化学习 "是一种影响知识保持的策略。本研究旨在评估在药学博士(PharmD)课程中使用重复测试进行间隔检索的频率对知识折旧的影响。研究将药学专业二年级学生随机分配到三个检索练习组中的一个:(1)两次检索练习评估(课程结束后 2 个月和 4 个月);(2)一次检索练习评估(课程结束后 4 个月);或(3)不进行检索练习。课程结束 6 个月后,对所有学员进行最终评估。检索评估和最终评估包括五道有关哮喘药物治疗的多项选择题。结果共有 94 名学员参加了研究,其中第一组 32 人,第二组和第三组均为 31 人。无论间隔检索的频率如何,三组在最终评估中的表现都差不多。在为期 4 个月的检索练习评估中,第一组的得分高于第二组,但这并不影响最终评估的成绩。结论无论在最初学习哮喘药物疗法的学术课程后进行间隔检索的频率如何,在本研究的间隙时间内使用多项选择评估进行检索练习不会影响二年级学生药剂师的哮喘药物疗法知识折旧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
192
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Preceptor perspectives on disability-related accommodations in pharmacy experiential education Practice transformation starts in the classroom: Mapping practice change learning in a PharmD program Keeping pace in the age of innovation: The perspective of Dutch pharmaceutical science students on the position of machine learning training in an undergraduate curriculum Live and learn: Utilizing MyDispense to increase student knowledge and confidence in caring for patients with diverse religious backgrounds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1