Ecological risk of synthetic phenolic antioxidants: A study based on their spatial distribution in water, sediment, and soil from the Yangtze River Delta, China

IF 7.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Research Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1016/j.envres.2024.119920
{"title":"Ecological risk of synthetic phenolic antioxidants: A study based on their spatial distribution in water, sediment, and soil from the Yangtze River Delta, China","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.envres.2024.119920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Environmental occurrence and risks of novel synthetic phenolic antioxidants (SPAs) remain largely unclear. By using a typical algae (<em>Chlorella pyrenoidosa</em>) as model organism, we evaluated the ecological risks of both traditional and novel SPAs, based on their concentrations in water, sediment, and soil collected from the Yangtze River Delta, China. Detection frequencies (DFs) of 10 novel SPAs were 25–100% in water, 3–100% in sediment, and 0–100% in soil, with geometric means (GMs) of 2700 ng/L, 1270 ng/g, and 2440 ng/g, respectively. For 8 traditional SPAs, DFs were 50–100% (GM: 680 ng/L), 3–100% (534 ng/g), and 47–100% (2240 ng/g) in water, sediment, and soil, respectively. AO3114 was the main pollutant in water, while AO1010 dominated in sediment and soil. Notably, low-molecular-weight SPAs showed migration behavior from sediment to water. Four SPAs (AO626, AO1035, AO1098, and AO1076) showed dose- and time-dependent toxicity on <em>Chlorella pyrenoidosa</em>. As time progressed, sediment-released SPAs became more toxic than those in water. Two SPAs (AO1135 and BHT-Q) posed high risks (<em>RQ</em><sub><em>W</em></sub> &gt; 1) to green algae, daphnia, and fish. The SPA mixture exhibited high risks (<em>RQ</em><sub><em>mix</em></sub> &gt; 1) to these organisms, increasing with the trophic level. This research holds valuable guidance for further SPA risk assessments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":312,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935124018255","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental occurrence and risks of novel synthetic phenolic antioxidants (SPAs) remain largely unclear. By using a typical algae (Chlorella pyrenoidosa) as model organism, we evaluated the ecological risks of both traditional and novel SPAs, based on their concentrations in water, sediment, and soil collected from the Yangtze River Delta, China. Detection frequencies (DFs) of 10 novel SPAs were 25–100% in water, 3–100% in sediment, and 0–100% in soil, with geometric means (GMs) of 2700 ng/L, 1270 ng/g, and 2440 ng/g, respectively. For 8 traditional SPAs, DFs were 50–100% (GM: 680 ng/L), 3–100% (534 ng/g), and 47–100% (2240 ng/g) in water, sediment, and soil, respectively. AO3114 was the main pollutant in water, while AO1010 dominated in sediment and soil. Notably, low-molecular-weight SPAs showed migration behavior from sediment to water. Four SPAs (AO626, AO1035, AO1098, and AO1076) showed dose- and time-dependent toxicity on Chlorella pyrenoidosa. As time progressed, sediment-released SPAs became more toxic than those in water. Two SPAs (AO1135 and BHT-Q) posed high risks (RQW > 1) to green algae, daphnia, and fish. The SPA mixture exhibited high risks (RQmix > 1) to these organisms, increasing with the trophic level. This research holds valuable guidance for further SPA risk assessments.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
合成酚类抗氧化剂的生态风险:基于合成酚类抗氧化剂在中国长江三角洲地区水体、沉积物和土壤中空间分布的研究。
新型合成酚类抗氧化剂(SPA)的环境发生率和风险在很大程度上仍不明确。我们以一种典型的藻类(小球藻)为模式生物,根据其在中国长江三角洲地区采集的水、沉积物和土壤中的浓度,评估了传统和新型酚类抗氧化剂的生态风险。10种新型SPA在水中的检测频率(DFs)为25-100%,在沉积物中的检测频率(DFs)为3-100%,在土壤中的检测频率(DFs)为0-100%,其几何平均值(GMs)分别为2700纳克/升、1270纳克/克和2440纳克/克。在 8 个传统的 SPA 中,水、沉积物和土壤中的 DF 值分别为 50-100%(GM:680 纳克/升)、3-100%(534 纳克/克)和 47-100%(2240 纳克/克)。AO3114 是水中的主要污染物,而 AO1010 则是沉积物和土壤中的主要污染物。值得注意的是,低分子量的 SPA 表现出从沉积物向水中迁移的行为。四种 SPA(AO626、AO1035、AO1098 和 AO1076)对小球藻(Chlorella pyrenoidosa)的毒性呈剂量和时间依赖性。随着时间的推移,沉积物释放的 SPA 比水中的 SPA 毒性更大。两种 SPA(AO1135 和 BHT-Q)对绿藻、水蚤和鱼类具有高风险(RQW > 1)。SPA 混合物对这些生物的风险较高(RQmix > 1),且随着营养级的增加而增加。这项研究为进一步开展 SPA 风险评估提供了宝贵的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Research
Environmental Research 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
8.40%
发文量
2480
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: The Environmental Research journal presents a broad range of interdisciplinary research, focused on addressing worldwide environmental concerns and featuring innovative findings. Our publication strives to explore relevant anthropogenic issues across various environmental sectors, showcasing practical applications in real-life settings.
期刊最新文献
Research on the mechanisms of 2D road runoff pollution migration and the influence of pipeline overflow onto roads Corrigendum to Non-essential and essential trace element mixtures and kidney function in early pregnancy – A cross-sectional analysis in project viva [Environ. Res. 216P4 (2023) 114846] Bacterial community and dissolved organic matter networks in urban river: The role of human influence Degradation of phenol by metal-free electro-fenton using a carbonyl-modified activated carbon cathode: Promoting simultaneous H2O2 generation and activation Corrigendum to: “Association between ambient temperature and thyroid-stimulating hormone and free thyroxine levels in Korean euthyroid adults” [Environ. Res. Volume 262, Part 2, 1 December 2024, Article Number 119918]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1