Tunnel-free peroral endoscopic myotomy reduces procedural time and maintains efficacy in Zenker's diverticulum.

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Annals of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-12 DOI:10.20524/aog.2024.0902
Georgios Mavrogenis, Maria Zachou, Ioannis Tsevgas, Konstantinos Markoglou, Dimitrios Zachariadis, Anna Spanomanoli, Marinos Chatzis, Fateh Bazerbachi
{"title":"Tunnel-free peroral endoscopic myotomy reduces procedural time and maintains efficacy in Zenker's diverticulum.","authors":"Georgios Mavrogenis, Maria Zachou, Ioannis Tsevgas, Konstantinos Markoglou, Dimitrios Zachariadis, Anna Spanomanoli, Marinos Chatzis, Fateh Bazerbachi","doi":"10.20524/aog.2024.0902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peroral endoscopic myotomy (Z-POEM) is an effective treatment for Zenker's diverticulum (ZD), but procedural time and safety vary based on technique. Modified Z-POEM approaches incorporating fewer submucosal tunnels may offer advantages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective, single-center study, we compared outcomes among 20 patients with ZD undergoing standard Z-POEM (2 tunnels), single-tunnel Z-POEM (ST Z-POEM), or tunnel-free Z-POEM (TF Z-POEM). All procedures included mucosotomy over the septum and deep extension of myotomy into the esophagus (2 cm). Primary endpoints were procedural time, clinical success, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients had a mean age of 67.3±12.2 years, and 70% presented with respiratory symptoms. Mean procedure times were 45 min (standard Z-POEM), 33 min (ST Z-POEM), and 30 min (TF Z-POEM), with a statistically significant difference between the standard and TF Z-POEM groups (P=0.014). Technical success was 100%, and the mean hospital stay was 1.3±1.3 days. One adverse event (5%) occurred. Clinical success, defined as improvement in dysphagia score (3 to 0.05, P<0.001) and resolution of respiratory symptoms, was achieved in all patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, modified Z-POEM techniques utilizing single-tunnel or tunnel-free approaches, combined with over-the-septum mucosotomy and deep esophageal myotomy (2 cm), demonstrated feasibility, safety and a significantly shorter procedural time compared to standard Z-POEM. These findings suggest potential benefits for ZD treatment, warranting further investigation in larger prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":"37 5","pages":"509-513"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11372543/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2024.0902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (Z-POEM) is an effective treatment for Zenker's diverticulum (ZD), but procedural time and safety vary based on technique. Modified Z-POEM approaches incorporating fewer submucosal tunnels may offer advantages.

Methods: In this retrospective, single-center study, we compared outcomes among 20 patients with ZD undergoing standard Z-POEM (2 tunnels), single-tunnel Z-POEM (ST Z-POEM), or tunnel-free Z-POEM (TF Z-POEM). All procedures included mucosotomy over the septum and deep extension of myotomy into the esophagus (2 cm). Primary endpoints were procedural time, clinical success, and adverse events.

Results: Patients had a mean age of 67.3±12.2 years, and 70% presented with respiratory symptoms. Mean procedure times were 45 min (standard Z-POEM), 33 min (ST Z-POEM), and 30 min (TF Z-POEM), with a statistically significant difference between the standard and TF Z-POEM groups (P=0.014). Technical success was 100%, and the mean hospital stay was 1.3±1.3 days. One adverse event (5%) occurred. Clinical success, defined as improvement in dysphagia score (3 to 0.05, P<0.001) and resolution of respiratory symptoms, was achieved in all patients.

Conclusions: In this study, modified Z-POEM techniques utilizing single-tunnel or tunnel-free approaches, combined with over-the-septum mucosotomy and deep esophageal myotomy (2 cm), demonstrated feasibility, safety and a significantly shorter procedural time compared to standard Z-POEM. These findings suggest potential benefits for ZD treatment, warranting further investigation in larger prospective studies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无隧道口腔内窥镜肌切开术缩短了 Zenker 胃憩室的手术时间并保持了疗效。
背景:口周内镜下肌切开术(Z-POEM)是治疗禅克氏憩室(ZD)的有效方法,但手术时间和安全性因技术而异。改良的 Z-POEM 方法结合了更少的粘膜下隧道,可能会带来优势:在这项回顾性单中心研究中,我们比较了 20 名 ZD 患者接受标准 Z-POEM(2 个隧道)、单隧道 Z-POEM(ST Z-POEM)或无隧道 Z-POEM(TF Z-POEM)手术的结果。所有手术都包括隔膜上的粘膜切开术和深入食管(2 厘米)的肌切开术。主要终点是手术时间、临床成功率和不良事件:患者平均年龄(67.3±12.2)岁,70%有呼吸道症状。平均手术时间为 45 分钟(标准 Z-POEM)、33 分钟(ST Z-POEM)和 30 分钟(TF Z-POEM),标准组和 TF Z-POEM 组之间的差异有统计学意义(P=0.014)。技术成功率为 100%,平均住院时间为 1.3±1.3 天。发生了一起不良事件(5%)。临床成功定义为吞咽困难评分的改善(3 至 0.05,PC 结论:在这项研究中,采用单隧道或无隧道方法的改良 Z-POEM 技术,结合隔膜上粘膜切开术和深部食管肌切开术(2 厘米),与标准 Z-POEM 相比,具有可行性、安全性和显著缩短的手术时间。这些研究结果表明了 ZD 治疗的潜在益处,值得在更大规模的前瞻性研究中进一步探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterology
Annals of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
期刊最新文献
The therapeutic benefits of epigallocatechin gallate in rats with experimentally induced ulcerative colitis are achieved by influencing inflammation and apoptosis. Trends and outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage and pancreatic necrosectomy for acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gastroenterostomy for malignant and benign gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Effectiveness of upadacitinib in ulcerative colitis patients with prior tofacitinib exposure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Managing inflammatory bowel disease in patients receiving cancer-associated chemotherapy and beyond.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1