Applications of ocular point-of-care ultrasound assessment in the emergency setting: a scoping review.

IF 2.3 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-06 DOI:10.15441/ceem.24.249
Christopher D Yang, Christine K Kim, Melissa M Chang, Pooya Khosravi, Ajeet Pal Bayo Bhatia, Amanda Dos Santos, Kyle Dornhofer, Megan Guy, Edmund Hsu, Soheil Saadat, John Christian Fox
{"title":"Applications of ocular point-of-care ultrasound assessment in the emergency setting: a scoping review.","authors":"Christopher D Yang, Christine K Kim, Melissa M Chang, Pooya Khosravi, Ajeet Pal Bayo Bhatia, Amanda Dos Santos, Kyle Dornhofer, Megan Guy, Edmund Hsu, Soheil Saadat, John Christian Fox","doi":"10.15441/ceem.24.249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the current body of literature pertaining to the use of ocular point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in the emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted on Scopus, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases. Inclusion criteria were studies written in English and primary clinical studies involving ocular POCUS scans in an ED setting. Exclusion criteria were nonprimary studies (e.g., reviews or case reports), studies written in a non-English language, nonhuman studies, studies performed in a nonemergency setting, studies involving non-POCUS ocular ultrasound modalities, or studies published more than 10 years prior. Data extraction was guided by the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial search yielded 391 results with 153 duplicates. Of the remaining 238 studies selected for retrieval and screening, 24 met the inclusion criteria. These 24 included studies encompassed 2,448 patients across prospective, retrospective, cross-sectional, and case series study designs. The majority of included studies focused on the use of POCUS in the ED to measure optic nerve sheath diameter as a proxy for papilledema and metabolic aberrations, while a minority of studies used ocular POCUS to assist in the diagnosis of orbital fractures or posterior segment pathology.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The vast majority of studies investigating the use of ocular POCUS in recent years emphasize its utility in measuring optic nerve sheath diameter and fluctuations in intracranial pressure, though additional outcomes of interest include pathology of the posterior segment, orbit, and globe.</p>","PeriodicalId":10325,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"188-197"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12541526/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.24.249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the current body of literature pertaining to the use of ocular point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in the emergency department (ED).

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted on Scopus, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases. Inclusion criteria were studies written in English and primary clinical studies involving ocular POCUS scans in an ED setting. Exclusion criteria were nonprimary studies (e.g., reviews or case reports), studies written in a non-English language, nonhuman studies, studies performed in a nonemergency setting, studies involving non-POCUS ocular ultrasound modalities, or studies published more than 10 years prior. Data extraction was guided by the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) recommendations.

Results: The initial search yielded 391 results with 153 duplicates. Of the remaining 238 studies selected for retrieval and screening, 24 met the inclusion criteria. These 24 included studies encompassed 2,448 patients across prospective, retrospective, cross-sectional, and case series study designs. The majority of included studies focused on the use of POCUS in the ED to measure optic nerve sheath diameter as a proxy for papilledema and metabolic aberrations, while a minority of studies used ocular POCUS to assist in the diagnosis of orbital fractures or posterior segment pathology.

Conclusion: The vast majority of studies investigating the use of ocular POCUS in recent years emphasize its utility in measuring optic nerve sheath diameter and fluctuations in intracranial pressure, though additional outcomes of interest include pathology of the posterior segment, orbit, and globe.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
眼科护理点超声波在急诊视神经鞘评估中的应用:系统回顾。
目的评估目前与急诊科使用眼科护理点超声波(POCUS)相关的文献:方法:在 SCOPUS、Web of Science、MEDLINE 和 Cochrane CENTRAL 上进行了全面的文献检索。纳入标准包括仅以英语撰写的研究以及涉及急诊科眼科 POCUS 扫描的主要临床研究。排除标准包括非主要研究(如综述或病例报告)、用非英语撰写的研究、非人类研究、在非急诊环境下进行的研究、涉及非 POCUS 眼科超声模式的研究或过去十年以外发表的研究。数据提取以系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)建议为指导:最初的搜索结果有 391 项,其中 153 项重复。在其余 238 项被选中进行检索和筛选的研究中,有 24 项符合纳入标准。这 24 项纳入研究涵盖了 2448 名患者,研究设计包括前瞻性、回顾性、横断面和病例系列研究。我们发现,大部分纳入的研究侧重于在急诊科使用 POCUS 测量 ONSD 作为乳头水肿和代谢畸变的替代指标,而少数研究则使用眼部 POCUS 协助诊断眼眶骨折或眼后节病变:结论:近年来,绝大多数研究眼科 POCUS 应用的文章都强调了其在测量 ONSD 和颅内压波动方面的实用性,但其他值得关注的结果还包括后段、眼眶和眼球病变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
Use of biomarkers in the early diagnosis of Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review. Initial diagnosis and management of acute ischemic stroke: recent update and future direction. Machine Learning-Based Clusters of Vital Signs and Lactate Levels Predict Vasopressor Use in Sepsis. How dispatchers recognize agonal and abnormal breathing in suspected cardiac arrest: A scoping review. Emergency Department Crowding in the Modern Era: A Systematic Review (2018-2025).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1