Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion (TAPSE) in COPD Patients, A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.9 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.15441/ceem.24.228
M Groussis, Q K Tran, M Hoffer, J Ahari, A Pourmand
{"title":"Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion (TAPSE) in COPD Patients, A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"M Groussis, Q K Tran, M Hoffer, J Ahari, A Pourmand","doi":"10.15441/ceem.24.228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) is an echocardiographic parameter that serves as a prognostic indicator for severity of COPD clinical course. This study, consisting of a systematic review and meta-analysis, evaluates the current literature to elucidate the relationship between TAPSE measurement in COPD patients versus control subjects to discern baseline evidence of right heart strain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMedTM, ScopusTM, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane Review databases were searched from their beginning through November 1, 2023, for eligible studies. Outcomes included the difference of TAPSE measurement and right ventricular wall thickness between COPD patients and control patients. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was applied to assess risk of bias; Q-statistics and I2 values were used to assess for heterogeneity; and Egger's and Begg's test used to assess for publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded eleven studies reporting TAPSE values involving 1671 patients, 800 (47.9%) patients with COPD. The unadjusted mean TAPSE values for COPD patients was 18.9 mm (SD+/- 4), while the mean TAPSE value for control patients was 22.2 mm (SD+/- 0.8). The presence of COPD was significantly associated with decreased TAPSE values with the meta-analysis reporting the mean difference of TAPSE value between COPD and control patients was -3.0 (95% CI -4.3 to -1.7, P=0.001). Six studies reported the RV free wall thickness. The unadjusted mean RV free wall thickness for COPD patients was 4.9 mm (SD+/- 1.2), and control patients was 3.4 mm (SD+/- 0.7), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis demonstrated statistically-significantly lower TAPSE values and thicker RV free wall among COPD patients versus control patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10325,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.24.228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) is an echocardiographic parameter that serves as a prognostic indicator for severity of COPD clinical course. This study, consisting of a systematic review and meta-analysis, evaluates the current literature to elucidate the relationship between TAPSE measurement in COPD patients versus control subjects to discern baseline evidence of right heart strain.

Methods: PubMedTM, ScopusTM, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane Review databases were searched from their beginning through November 1, 2023, for eligible studies. Outcomes included the difference of TAPSE measurement and right ventricular wall thickness between COPD patients and control patients. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was applied to assess risk of bias; Q-statistics and I2 values were used to assess for heterogeneity; and Egger's and Begg's test used to assess for publication bias.

Results: The search yielded eleven studies reporting TAPSE values involving 1671 patients, 800 (47.9%) patients with COPD. The unadjusted mean TAPSE values for COPD patients was 18.9 mm (SD+/- 4), while the mean TAPSE value for control patients was 22.2 mm (SD+/- 0.8). The presence of COPD was significantly associated with decreased TAPSE values with the meta-analysis reporting the mean difference of TAPSE value between COPD and control patients was -3.0 (95% CI -4.3 to -1.7, P=0.001). Six studies reported the RV free wall thickness. The unadjusted mean RV free wall thickness for COPD patients was 4.9 mm (SD+/- 1.2), and control patients was 3.4 mm (SD+/- 0.7), respectively.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrated statistically-significantly lower TAPSE values and thicker RV free wall among COPD patients versus control patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性阻塞性肺病患者的三尖瓣瓣环平面收缩期偏移 (TAPSE),系统回顾和元分析。
简介三尖瓣环平面收缩期偏移(TAPSE)是一种超声心动图参数,可作为慢性阻塞性肺病临床病程严重程度的预后指标。本研究通过系统综述和荟萃分析对现有文献进行评估,以阐明慢性阻塞性肺病患者与对照受试者的 TAPSE 测量之间的关系,从而发现右心负荷的基线证据:方法:检索了 PubMedTM、ScopusTM、CINAHL、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Review 数据库中从开始到 2023 年 11 月 1 日符合条件的研究。研究结果包括 COPD 患者与对照组患者之间 TAPSE 测量值和右心室壁厚度的差异。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估偏倚风险;采用Q统计量和I2值评估异质性;采用Egger和Begg检验评估发表偏倚:搜索结果显示,有 11 项研究报告了 TAPSE 值,涉及 1671 名患者,其中 800 人(47.9%)为 COPD 患者。慢性阻塞性肺病患者未经调整的平均 TAPSE 值为 18.9 mm (SD+/-4),而对照组患者的平均 TAPSE 值为 22.2 mm (SD+/-0.8)。荟萃分析表明,慢性阻塞性肺病患者与对照组患者的 TAPSE 值平均相差-3.0(95% CI -4.3 至-1.7,P=0.001)。六项研究报告了 RV 游离壁厚度。未经调整的COPD患者平均RV游离壁厚度为4.9毫米(SD+/- 1.2),对照组患者为3.4毫米(SD+/- 0.7):这项荟萃分析表明,与对照组患者相比,慢性阻塞性肺病患者的 TAPSE 值明显更低,RV 游离壁更厚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
Acute iodinate contrast medium reaction: look at the CT images! Assessing the efficacy of electrocardiogram for heart rate evaluation during newborn resuscitation at birth: a prospective observational study. Case of multiple acute cerebral infarctions after blunt cerebrovascular injuries. Epidemiology of Deep Venous Thrombosis Among United States Emergency Departments Over an Eight-Year Period. Floating thrombus involving the aortic arch in a woman.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1