Detailing Healthcare Claims Data Evidence of Extrapyramidal Symptoms in Medicaid Patients with Schizophrenia after Second-Generation Antipsychotic Medication Initiation.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Community Mental Health Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1007/s10597-024-01347-7
Kristin Richards, Michael Johnsrud, Christopher Zacker, Rahul Sasané
{"title":"Detailing Healthcare Claims Data Evidence of Extrapyramidal Symptoms in Medicaid Patients with Schizophrenia after Second-Generation Antipsychotic Medication Initiation.","authors":"Kristin Richards, Michael Johnsrud, Christopher Zacker, Rahul Sasané","doi":"10.1007/s10597-024-01347-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Researchers have used elements of administrative healthcare claims data (e.g., diagnosis codes and medications) to calculate rates of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) in patients with schizophrenia who utilize second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs). However, a detailed description of claims-based EPS evidence has not been previously provided, which is the objective of the current study. This descriptive study, using 2016-2020 de-identified multi-state Medicaid administrative claims data, followed patients diagnosed with schizophrenia for 12 months after initiation of SGA therapy to identify and describe the first evidence of EPS. Time to EPS evidence was calculated and continuously-eligible patients were followed for an additional 12 months to examine EPS medication utilization and costs. Following SGA initiation, 13.6% (n = 2,288) of patients had evidence of EPS during the 12-month follow-up period. Mean time to first evidence of EPS after SGA initiation was 103.7 days (sd = 112.2, median = 58). For a majority of patients (n = 1,636, 71.5%), an EPS medication claim was the initial evidence of EPS, rather than an EPS diagnostic claim. Additionally, a quarter of patients (25.3%) in the EPS evidence cohort had a claim for an EPS medication on the same date as SGA initiation, possibly indicating prophylactic prescribing to prevent EPS development. Nearly 93% of those with EPS medication claims were treated with benztropine, while less than 2% received deutetrabenazine or valbenazine (indicated for tardive dyskinesia (TD)). Annual per patient EPS medication expenditures were $804 (sd = 7,080) overall, but only $40 (sd = 104) when excluding the higher-cost TD medications. Nearly 14% of Medicaid patients with schizophrenia who initiated SGA treatment had evidence of EPS based on claims data. The majority of the time, this evidence was derived from a prescription claim for a medication to treat EPS, rather than an EPS diagnostic claim. Prophylactic prescribing for EPS occurred more often than expected and should be explored more fully. While the cost of traditional EPS medications minimally contributes to the overall cost of care in schizophrenia, use of newer TD drugs can substantially increase spending.</p>","PeriodicalId":10654,"journal":{"name":"Community Mental Health Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community Mental Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-024-01347-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Researchers have used elements of administrative healthcare claims data (e.g., diagnosis codes and medications) to calculate rates of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) in patients with schizophrenia who utilize second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs). However, a detailed description of claims-based EPS evidence has not been previously provided, which is the objective of the current study. This descriptive study, using 2016-2020 de-identified multi-state Medicaid administrative claims data, followed patients diagnosed with schizophrenia for 12 months after initiation of SGA therapy to identify and describe the first evidence of EPS. Time to EPS evidence was calculated and continuously-eligible patients were followed for an additional 12 months to examine EPS medication utilization and costs. Following SGA initiation, 13.6% (n = 2,288) of patients had evidence of EPS during the 12-month follow-up period. Mean time to first evidence of EPS after SGA initiation was 103.7 days (sd = 112.2, median = 58). For a majority of patients (n = 1,636, 71.5%), an EPS medication claim was the initial evidence of EPS, rather than an EPS diagnostic claim. Additionally, a quarter of patients (25.3%) in the EPS evidence cohort had a claim for an EPS medication on the same date as SGA initiation, possibly indicating prophylactic prescribing to prevent EPS development. Nearly 93% of those with EPS medication claims were treated with benztropine, while less than 2% received deutetrabenazine or valbenazine (indicated for tardive dyskinesia (TD)). Annual per patient EPS medication expenditures were $804 (sd = 7,080) overall, but only $40 (sd = 104) when excluding the higher-cost TD medications. Nearly 14% of Medicaid patients with schizophrenia who initiated SGA treatment had evidence of EPS based on claims data. The majority of the time, this evidence was derived from a prescription claim for a medication to treat EPS, rather than an EPS diagnostic claim. Prophylactic prescribing for EPS occurred more often than expected and should be explored more fully. While the cost of traditional EPS medications minimally contributes to the overall cost of care in schizophrenia, use of newer TD drugs can substantially increase spending.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
详述医疗保健理赔数据中有关医保精神分裂症患者开始服用第二代抗精神病药物后出现锥体外系症状的证据。
研究人员曾使用行政医疗索赔数据(如诊断代码和药物)来计算使用第二代抗精神病药物(SGA)的精神分裂症患者的锥体外系症状(EPS)发生率。然而,此前尚未对基于理赔的 EPS 证据进行详细描述,这也是本研究的目的所在。本描述性研究使用 2016-2020 年去标识化的多州医疗补助行政索赔数据,对诊断为精神分裂症的患者在开始 SGA 治疗后的 12 个月内进行随访,以识别和描述 EPS 的首次证据。研究计算了出现 EPS 证据的时间,并对连续符合条件的患者再随访 12 个月,以检查 EPS 药物使用情况和费用。在开始使用 SGA 后,13.6% 的患者(n = 2,288 人)在 12 个月的随访期间出现了 EPS 证据。使用 SGA 后首次出现 EPS 证据的平均时间为 103.7 天(sd = 112.2,中位数 = 58)。对于大多数患者(n = 1,636, 71.5%)而言,EPS药物治疗申请是EPS的最初证据,而非EPS诊断申请。此外,在 EPS 证据组群中,有四分之一的患者(25.3%)在开始服用 SGA 的同一天申请了 EPS 药物治疗,这可能表明他们为预防 EPS 的发生而进行了预防性处方。在申请 EPS 药物治疗的患者中,近 93% 接受了苯托品治疗,不到 2% 接受了去甲替拉嗪或戊苯嗪治疗(适用于迟发性运动障碍 (TD))。总体而言,每位患者每年的 EPS 药物支出为 804 美元(sd = 7080),但如果剔除成本较高的 TD 药物,则仅为 40 美元(sd = 104)。在开始接受 SGA 治疗的医疗补助精神分裂症患者中,有近 14% 的患者有证据表明其在报销数据基础上出现了 EPS。大多数情况下,这些证据来自治疗 EPS 药物的处方索赔,而非 EPS 诊断索赔。针对 EPS 的预防性处方的发生率高于预期,应对此进行更全面的探讨。虽然传统的 EPS 药物费用对精神分裂症总体治疗费用的影响很小,但使用较新的 TD 药物会大幅增加支出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Community Mental Health Journal focuses on the needs of people experiencing serious forms of psychological distress, as well as the structures established to address those needs. Areas of particular interest include critical examination of current paradigms of diagnosis and treatment, socio-structural determinants of mental health, social hierarchies within the public mental health systems, and the intersection of public mental health programs and social/racial justice and health equity. While this is the journal of the American Association for Community Psychiatry, we welcome manuscripts reflecting research from a range of disciplines on recovery-oriented services, public health policy, clinical delivery systems, advocacy, and emerging and innovative practices.
期刊最新文献
Detailing Healthcare Claims Data Evidence of Extrapyramidal Symptoms in Medicaid Patients with Schizophrenia after Second-Generation Antipsychotic Medication Initiation. The Role of Acculturative Stress on the Mental Health of Immigrant Youth: A Scoping Literature Review. Understanding and Navigating the Unique Barriers Rural Primary Care Settings Face when Implementing Collaborative Care for Mental Health. Exploring the Lived Experiences of Medication for Opioid use Disorder Treatment: A Qualitative Study among a Crowdsourced Convenience Sample. The Meaning of Social Support for Mental Health Service-Users: The Case Managers' Perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1