The interaction of lipomatous hypertrophy of the interatrial septum with pericardial adipose tissue biomarkers by computed tomography.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Radiology Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1007/s00330-024-11061-3
Pietro G Lacaita, Thomas Senoner, Valentin Bilgeri, Stefan Rauch, Fabian Barbieri, Benedikt Kindl, Fabian Plank, Wolfgang Dichtl, Johannes Deeg, Gerlig Widmann, Gudrun M Feuchtner
{"title":"The interaction of lipomatous hypertrophy of the interatrial septum with pericardial adipose tissue biomarkers by computed tomography.","authors":"Pietro G Lacaita, Thomas Senoner, Valentin Bilgeri, Stefan Rauch, Fabian Barbieri, Benedikt Kindl, Fabian Plank, Wolfgang Dichtl, Johannes Deeg, Gerlig Widmann, Gudrun M Feuchtner","doi":"10.1007/s00330-024-11061-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Novel pericardial adipose tissue imaging biomarkers are currently under investigation for cardiovascular risk stratification. However, a specific compartment of the epicardial adipose tissue (EAT), lipomatous hypertrophy of the interatrial septum (LHIS), is included in the pericardial fat volume (PCFV) quantification software. Our aim was to evaluate LHIS by computed tomography angiography (CTA), to elaborate differences to other pericardial adipose tissue components (EAT) and paracardial adipose tissue (PAT), and to compare CT with [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG-PET.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Of 6983 patients screened who underwent coronary CTA for clinical indications, 190 patients with LHIS were finally included (age 62.8 years ± 9.6, 31.6% females, BMI 28.5 kg/cm<sup>2</sup> ± 4.7) in our retrospective cohort study. CT images were quantified for LHIS, EAT, and PAT density (HU), and total PCFV, with and without LHIS, was calculated. CT was compared with [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG-PET if available.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CT-density of LHIS was higher (- 22.4 HU ± 22.8) than all other pericardial adipose tissue components: EAT right and left (97.4 HU ± 13 and - 95.1 HU ± 13) PAT right and left (- 107.5 HU ± 13.4 and - 106.3 HU ± 14.5) and PCFV density -83.3 HU ± 5.6 (p < 0.001). There was a mild association between LHIS and PAT right (Beta 0.338, p = 0.006, 95% CI: 0.098-577) and PAT left (Beta 0.249, p = 0.030; 95% CI: 0.024-0.474) but not EAT right (p = 0.325) and left (p = 0.351), and not with total PCFV density (p = 0.164). The segmented LHIS volume comprised 3.01% of the total PCFV, and 4.3% (range, 2.16-11.7%) in those with LHIS > 9 mm. [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG-PET: LHIS was tracer uptake positive in 83.3% (37.5%: mild and 45.8%: minimal) of 24 patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LHIS is a distinct compartment of PCFV with higher density suggesting brown fat and has no consistent association with EAT, but rather with PAT.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance statement: </strong>LHIS should be recognized as a distinct compartment of the EAT, when using EAT for cardiovascular risk stratification.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>LHIS is currently included in EAT quantification software. LHIS density is relatively high, it is not associated with EAT, and has a high [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG-PET positive rate suggesting brown fat. LHIS is a distinct compartment of the EAT, and it may act differently as an imaging biomarker for cardiovascular risk stratification.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-11061-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Novel pericardial adipose tissue imaging biomarkers are currently under investigation for cardiovascular risk stratification. However, a specific compartment of the epicardial adipose tissue (EAT), lipomatous hypertrophy of the interatrial septum (LHIS), is included in the pericardial fat volume (PCFV) quantification software. Our aim was to evaluate LHIS by computed tomography angiography (CTA), to elaborate differences to other pericardial adipose tissue components (EAT) and paracardial adipose tissue (PAT), and to compare CT with [18F]FDG-PET.

Materials and methods: Of 6983 patients screened who underwent coronary CTA for clinical indications, 190 patients with LHIS were finally included (age 62.8 years ± 9.6, 31.6% females, BMI 28.5 kg/cm2 ± 4.7) in our retrospective cohort study. CT images were quantified for LHIS, EAT, and PAT density (HU), and total PCFV, with and without LHIS, was calculated. CT was compared with [18F]FDG-PET if available.

Results: CT-density of LHIS was higher (- 22.4 HU ± 22.8) than all other pericardial adipose tissue components: EAT right and left (97.4 HU ± 13 and - 95.1 HU ± 13) PAT right and left (- 107.5 HU ± 13.4 and - 106.3 HU ± 14.5) and PCFV density -83.3 HU ± 5.6 (p < 0.001). There was a mild association between LHIS and PAT right (Beta 0.338, p = 0.006, 95% CI: 0.098-577) and PAT left (Beta 0.249, p = 0.030; 95% CI: 0.024-0.474) but not EAT right (p = 0.325) and left (p = 0.351), and not with total PCFV density (p = 0.164). The segmented LHIS volume comprised 3.01% of the total PCFV, and 4.3% (range, 2.16-11.7%) in those with LHIS > 9 mm. [18F]FDG-PET: LHIS was tracer uptake positive in 83.3% (37.5%: mild and 45.8%: minimal) of 24 patients.

Conclusions: LHIS is a distinct compartment of PCFV with higher density suggesting brown fat and has no consistent association with EAT, but rather with PAT.

Clinical relevance statement: LHIS should be recognized as a distinct compartment of the EAT, when using EAT for cardiovascular risk stratification.

Key points: LHIS is currently included in EAT quantification software. LHIS density is relatively high, it is not associated with EAT, and has a high [18F]FDG-PET positive rate suggesting brown fat. LHIS is a distinct compartment of the EAT, and it may act differently as an imaging biomarker for cardiovascular risk stratification.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过计算机断层扫描观察房间隔脂肪肥厚与心包脂肪组织生物标志物之间的相互作用。
目的:目前正在研究用于心血管风险分层的新型心包脂肪组织成像生物标志物。然而,心外膜脂肪组织(EAT)的一个特殊区块,即房间隔脂肪瘤肥厚(LHIS),却被纳入了心包脂肪体积(PCFV)量化软件中。我们的目的是通过计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)评估 LHIS,阐述其与其他心包脂肪组织成分(EAT)和心旁脂肪组织(PAT)的区别,并将 CT 与 [18F]FDG-PET 进行比较:在 6983 例因临床适应症接受冠状动脉 CTA 筛查的患者中,我们的回顾性队列研究最终纳入了 190 例 LHIS 患者(年龄 62.8 岁 ± 9.6,女性 31.6%,体重指数 28.5 kg/cm2 ± 4.7)。我们对 CT 图像中的 LHIS、EAT 和 PAT 密度 (HU) 进行了量化,并计算了有 LHIS 和无 LHIS 的 PCFV 总值。如果有[18F]FDG-PET,则将CT与[18F]FDG-PET进行比较:结果:LHIS 的 CT 密度(- 22.4 HU ± 22.8)高于所有其他心包脂肪组织成分:EAT左右(97.4 HU ± 13和- 95.1 HU ± 13)PAT左右(- 107.5 HU ± 13.4和- 106.3 HU ± 14.5)和PCFV密度-83.3 HU ± 5.6(p 9 mm)。[18F]FDG-PET:24例患者中,83.3%(37.5%:轻度,45.8%:极轻度)的LHIS示踪摄取呈阳性:结论:LHIS是PCFV的一个独特分区,其密度较高,提示棕色脂肪,与EAT没有一致的关联,而是与PAT有关联:临床相关性声明:在使用 EAT 进行心血管风险分层时,LHIS 应被视为 EAT 的一个独特部分:要点:LHIS目前已被纳入EAT量化软件。要点:LHIS 目前已被纳入 EAT 定量软件。LHIS 密度相对较高,与 EAT 无关,且[18F]FDG-PET 阳性率较高,提示棕色脂肪。LHIS 是 EAT 的一个独特分区,它作为心血管风险分层的成像生物标志物可能会有不同的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
期刊最新文献
Reply to Letter to the Editor: "Ultra-low-dose vs. standard-of-care-dose CT of the chest in patients with post-COVID-19 conditions-a prospective intra-patient multi-reader study". Interval breast cancer rates for tomosynthesis vs mammography population screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Letter to the Editor: "Ultra-low-dose vs standard-of-care-dose CT of the chest in patients with post-COVID-19 conditions-a prospective intra-patient multi-reader study". Alveolar membrane and capillary function in COVID-19 convalescents: insights from chest MRI. High-performance presurgical differentiation of glioblastoma and metastasis by means of multiparametric neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) radiomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1