Conversion Rates, Causes, and Preoperative Associated Factors in 3,411 Laparoscopic Appendectomies: Insights after Nearly Three Decades of Laparoscopy and an Analysis of the Learning Curve.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1159/000541183
Lucía Aragone, Ramiro Arrechea, Mariana Toffolo, Walter Nardi, Daniel Pirchi
{"title":"Conversion Rates, Causes, and Preoperative Associated Factors in 3,411 Laparoscopic Appendectomies: Insights after Nearly Three Decades of Laparoscopy and an Analysis of the Learning Curve.","authors":"Lucía Aragone, Ramiro Arrechea, Mariana Toffolo, Walter Nardi, Daniel Pirchi","doi":"10.1159/000541183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Laparoscopic appendectomy is the current gold standard in treating acute appendicitis. Despite the low frequency of conversion to open surgery, it remains necessary in certain cases. Our primary outcome was to identify the conversion rate of laparoscopic appendectomy to open surgery and how this rate has changed over the learning curve. Second, we aim to determine the causes of conversion, their changes in frequency over time and to identify preoperative factors associated with conversion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective comparative study with prospective case registry was conducted. All patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy from January 2000 to December 2023 at a high-volume center were analyzed. The series was divided into six periods, each spanning 4 years. All patients who underwent totally laparoscopic appendectomy and those requiring conversion to open appendectomy were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3,411 appendectomies were performed during the study period, with an overall conversion rate of 0.96% (33/3,411). Our analysis showed that after the first three periods (12 years), the conversion rate decreased and reached a plateau of approximately 0.4%. The most common causes of conversion were perforation of the appendix base (9/33), abdominal cavity adhesions (8/33), and pneumoperitoneum intolerance (3/33). Age over 65, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score III/IV and symptom duration exceeding 24 h were preoperative factors significantly associated with conversion at univariate analysis. However, only age (p 0.0001) and symptoms exceeding 24 h (p 0.01) remained independently associated with conversion after multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In experienced centers, conversion from laparoscopic appendectomy to open appendectomy is uncommon, but remains necessary in certain cases. Despite identifying a population with higher association with conversion which should be advised preoperatively, due to the low incidence of conversions once the learning curve is overcome, an initial laparoscopic approach is the preferred choice.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541183","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Laparoscopic appendectomy is the current gold standard in treating acute appendicitis. Despite the low frequency of conversion to open surgery, it remains necessary in certain cases. Our primary outcome was to identify the conversion rate of laparoscopic appendectomy to open surgery and how this rate has changed over the learning curve. Second, we aim to determine the causes of conversion, their changes in frequency over time and to identify preoperative factors associated with conversion.

Methods: A retrospective comparative study with prospective case registry was conducted. All patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy from January 2000 to December 2023 at a high-volume center were analyzed. The series was divided into six periods, each spanning 4 years. All patients who underwent totally laparoscopic appendectomy and those requiring conversion to open appendectomy were included.

Results: A total of 3,411 appendectomies were performed during the study period, with an overall conversion rate of 0.96% (33/3,411). Our analysis showed that after the first three periods (12 years), the conversion rate decreased and reached a plateau of approximately 0.4%. The most common causes of conversion were perforation of the appendix base (9/33), abdominal cavity adhesions (8/33), and pneumoperitoneum intolerance (3/33). Age over 65, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score III/IV and symptom duration exceeding 24 h were preoperative factors significantly associated with conversion at univariate analysis. However, only age (p 0.0001) and symptoms exceeding 24 h (p 0.01) remained independently associated with conversion after multivariate analysis.

Conclusion: In experienced centers, conversion from laparoscopic appendectomy to open appendectomy is uncommon, but remains necessary in certain cases. Despite identifying a population with higher association with conversion which should be advised preoperatively, due to the low incidence of conversions once the learning curve is overcome, an initial laparoscopic approach is the preferred choice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
3411 例腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的转化率、原因和术前相关因素:腹腔镜手术近三十年后的启示和学习曲线分析。
简介:腹腔镜阑尾切除术是目前治疗急性阑尾炎的金标准:腹腔镜阑尾切除术是目前治疗急性阑尾炎的金标准。尽管腹腔镜阑尾切除术转为开腹手术的频率很低,但在某些情况下仍有必要。我们的主要研究结果是确定腹腔镜阑尾切除术转为开腹手术的比例,以及这一比例在学习曲线中的变化情况。其次,我们旨在确定转为开放手术的原因及其频率随时间的变化,并找出与转为开放手术相关的术前因素:方法:我们通过前瞻性病例登记进行了一项回顾性比较研究。研究分析了 2000 年 1 月至 2023 年 12 月期间在一家大型医疗中心接受腹腔镜阑尾切除术的所有患者。该系列研究分为六个阶段,每个阶段跨越四年。所有接受全腹腔镜阑尾切除术(TLA)和需要转为开腹阑尾切除术(COA)的患者都包括在内:研究期间共进行了 3411 例阑尾切除术,总转换率为 0.96%(33/3411)。我们的分析表明,在前三个阶段(12 年)之后,转化率有所下降,并达到约 0.4% 的高点。最常见的转院原因是阑尾底部穿孔(9/33)、腹腔粘连(8/33)和腹腔积气(3/33)。在单变量分析中,年龄超过 65 岁、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分 III/IV 级和症状持续时间超过 24 小时是与转院显著相关的术前因素。然而,经过多变量分析后,只有年龄(P 0.0001)和症状持续时间超过 24 小时(P 0.01)仍与转为腹腔镜手术独立相关:结论:在经验丰富的中心,从腹腔镜阑尾切除术转为开腹阑尾切除术的情况并不常见,但在某些情况下仍有必要。尽管术前应告知有较高转归风险的人群,但由于一旦克服了学习曲线,转归发生率较低,因此腹腔镜手术是首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Mentorship in academic musculoskeletal radiology: perspectives from a junior faculty member. Underlying synovial sarcoma undiagnosed for more than 20 years in a patient with regional pain: a case report. Sacrococcygeal chordoma with spontaneous regression due to a large hemorrhagic component. Associations of cumulative voriconazole dose, treatment duration, and alkaline phosphatase with voriconazole-induced periostitis. Can the presence of SLAP-5 lesions be predicted by using the critical shoulder angle in traumatic anterior shoulder instability?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1