Anything is better than nothing': exploring attitudes towards novel therapies in leukodystrophy clinical trials.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1186/s13023-024-03320-9
Ella Wilson, Richard Leventer, Chloe Cunningham, Michelle G de Silva, Jan Hodgson, Eloise Uebergang
{"title":"Anything is better than nothing': exploring attitudes towards novel therapies in leukodystrophy clinical trials.","authors":"Ella Wilson, Richard Leventer, Chloe Cunningham, Michelle G de Silva, Jan Hodgson, Eloise Uebergang","doi":"10.1186/s13023-024-03320-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Leukodystrophies comprise a group of genetic white matter disorders that lead to progressive motor and cognitive impairment. Recent development of novel therapies has led to an increase in clinical trials for leukodystrophies. To enable recruitment of individuals with a leukodystrophy into clinical trials, clinical trial acceptability should be ascertained. We sought therefore, to identify the motivations for and barriers to clinical trial participation in addition to clinical trial features that may be of concern to individuals with a leukodystrophy and/or their carers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults with a leukodystrophy and parents/carers of individuals with a leukodystrophy were recruited through the Australian Leukodystrophy Registry and through online advertisements. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were used to explore participants views on what clinical trials involve, the perceived risks and benefits of clinical trials, their desire to participate in clinical trials and their personal experience with leukodystrophy. Thematic analysis of data was performed with co-coding of interview transcripts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>5 interviews were held with parents of children with leukodystrophy, 4 with parents of adults with leukodystrophy and 3 with adults diagnosed with leukodystrophy. Motivations for clinical trial enrolment include access to potentially lifesaving novel treatments and improved prognostic outcomes. Participants were concerned about adverse clinical trial outcomes, including side effects and exacerbation of illness. Despite this, majority of participants were willing to try anything in clinical trials, demonstrating a high tolerance for first in human trials and trials utilising invasive treatment options.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Interviewees communicated a strong desire to participate in interventional clinical trials involving novel therapies. To support enrolment into future leukodystrophy clinical trials we suggest the provision of transparent information regarding clinical trial treatments, consideration of alternative trial control measures, and inclusion of treating clinicians in the trial recruitment process. Clinicians play an integral role in initiating transparent conversations regarding trial risks and adverse outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19651,"journal":{"name":"Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11378604/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-024-03320-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aim: Leukodystrophies comprise a group of genetic white matter disorders that lead to progressive motor and cognitive impairment. Recent development of novel therapies has led to an increase in clinical trials for leukodystrophies. To enable recruitment of individuals with a leukodystrophy into clinical trials, clinical trial acceptability should be ascertained. We sought therefore, to identify the motivations for and barriers to clinical trial participation in addition to clinical trial features that may be of concern to individuals with a leukodystrophy and/or their carers.

Methods: Adults with a leukodystrophy and parents/carers of individuals with a leukodystrophy were recruited through the Australian Leukodystrophy Registry and through online advertisements. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were used to explore participants views on what clinical trials involve, the perceived risks and benefits of clinical trials, their desire to participate in clinical trials and their personal experience with leukodystrophy. Thematic analysis of data was performed with co-coding of interview transcripts.

Results: 5 interviews were held with parents of children with leukodystrophy, 4 with parents of adults with leukodystrophy and 3 with adults diagnosed with leukodystrophy. Motivations for clinical trial enrolment include access to potentially lifesaving novel treatments and improved prognostic outcomes. Participants were concerned about adverse clinical trial outcomes, including side effects and exacerbation of illness. Despite this, majority of participants were willing to try anything in clinical trials, demonstrating a high tolerance for first in human trials and trials utilising invasive treatment options.

Conclusions: Interviewees communicated a strong desire to participate in interventional clinical trials involving novel therapies. To support enrolment into future leukodystrophy clinical trials we suggest the provision of transparent information regarding clinical trial treatments, consideration of alternative trial control measures, and inclusion of treating clinicians in the trial recruitment process. Clinicians play an integral role in initiating transparent conversations regarding trial risks and adverse outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有总比没有好":探讨白营养不良症临床试验中对新型疗法的态度。
背景/目的:白质营养不良症是一组遗传性白质疾病,会导致进行性运动和认知障碍。近年来新疗法的开发导致白质营养不良症临床试验的增加。为了招募白质营养不良症患者参加临床试验,应确定临床试验的可接受性。因此,我们试图找出白质营养不良症患者和/或其护理者参与临床试验的动机和障碍,以及他们可能关注的临床试验特点:方法:通过澳大利亚白营养不良症登记处和在线广告招募白营养不良症患者及其父母/照护者。我们采用定性半结构式访谈的方式,探究参与者对临床试验的看法、临床试验的风险和益处、他们参与临床试验的愿望以及他们患白血病的个人经历。通过对访谈记录进行共同编码,对数据进行了主题分析:结果:与白营养不良症儿童的父母进行了 5 次访谈,与白营养不良症成人的父母进行了 4 次访谈,与确诊患有白营养不良症的成人进行了 3 次访谈。参加临床试验的动机包括获得可能挽救生命的新疗法和改善预后结果。参与者担心临床试验的不良后果,包括副作用和病情恶化。尽管如此,大多数参与者还是愿意尝试临床试验中的任何项目,这表明他们对首次人体试验和采用侵入性治疗方案的试验具有很高的耐受性:结论:受访者表达了参与新型疗法干预性临床试验的强烈愿望。为支持受试者参加未来的白营养不良症临床试验,我们建议提供有关临床试验治疗的透明信息,考虑其他试验控制措施,并将治疗临床医生纳入试验招募过程。临床医生在启动有关试验风险和不良结果的透明对话方面发挥着不可或缺的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.10%
发文量
418
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that encompasses all aspects of rare diseases and orphan drugs. The journal publishes high-quality reviews on specific rare diseases. In addition, the journal may consider articles on clinical trial outcome reports, either positive or negative, and articles on public health issues in the field of rare diseases and orphan drugs. The journal does not accept case reports.
期刊最新文献
Pain, quality of life, and integral management in a cohort of patients diagnosed with hypophosphatasia in Colombia. Molecular analysis of inherited disorders of cornification in polish patients show novel variants and functional data and provokes questions on the significance of secondary findings. PHARC syndrome: an overview. Quality of life and mental health status in caregivers of pediatric patients with nephropathic cystinosis. Study on the disease burden of patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type II in China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1