The Impact of Different Regional Anesthesia Techniques on the Incidence of Chronic Post-surgical Pain in Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Network Meta-analysis.
{"title":"The Impact of Different Regional Anesthesia Techniques on the Incidence of Chronic Post-surgical Pain in Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Network Meta-analysis.","authors":"Yue Zhao, Yaming Guo, Xue Pan, Xinyue Zhang, Fang Yu, Xuezhao Cao","doi":"10.1007/s40122-024-00648-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) remains a prevalent issue following video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), despite advancements in surgical techniques. Various regional anesthesia techniques, including thoracic paravertebral block (PVB), intercostal nerve block (ICNB), serratus anterior plane block (SAPB), erector spinae plane block (ESPB), and thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA), have been employed in VATS procedures to mitigate this issue. This study aims to compare the efficacy of these analgesia methods in reducing the incidence of CPSP in VATS patients through a network meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the incidence of CPSP associated with PVB, ICNB, SAPB, ESPB, and TEA. The occurrence of CPSP was evaluated at both 2-3 months and 6 months post-surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six RCTs, involving 652 patients, were included in the analysis of CPSP incidence at 2-3 months, while seven RCTs, involving 715 patients, were included for 6 months analysis. PVB, ICNB, or TEA reduced CPSP incidence compared with control group (without regional anesthesia techniques) at both 2-3 months and 6 months post-surgery. However, SAPB was found less effective in reducing CPSP incidence at 2-3 months post-VATS compared to PVB, ICNB, or TEA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PVB, ICNB, and TEA exhibit significant effects on reducing CPSP incidence following VATS. Conversely, SAPB is not recommended for reducing CPSP incidence post-VATS. Nonetheless, considering the limitation of a small sample size in this network meta-analysis, additional RCTs are necessary to validate these conclusions and enhance the management of CPSP after VATS.</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-024-00648-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) remains a prevalent issue following video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), despite advancements in surgical techniques. Various regional anesthesia techniques, including thoracic paravertebral block (PVB), intercostal nerve block (ICNB), serratus anterior plane block (SAPB), erector spinae plane block (ESPB), and thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA), have been employed in VATS procedures to mitigate this issue. This study aims to compare the efficacy of these analgesia methods in reducing the incidence of CPSP in VATS patients through a network meta-analysis.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the incidence of CPSP associated with PVB, ICNB, SAPB, ESPB, and TEA. The occurrence of CPSP was evaluated at both 2-3 months and 6 months post-surgery.
Results: Six RCTs, involving 652 patients, were included in the analysis of CPSP incidence at 2-3 months, while seven RCTs, involving 715 patients, were included for 6 months analysis. PVB, ICNB, or TEA reduced CPSP incidence compared with control group (without regional anesthesia techniques) at both 2-3 months and 6 months post-surgery. However, SAPB was found less effective in reducing CPSP incidence at 2-3 months post-VATS compared to PVB, ICNB, or TEA.
Conclusions: PVB, ICNB, and TEA exhibit significant effects on reducing CPSP incidence following VATS. Conversely, SAPB is not recommended for reducing CPSP incidence post-VATS. Nonetheless, considering the limitation of a small sample size in this network meta-analysis, additional RCTs are necessary to validate these conclusions and enhance the management of CPSP after VATS.
期刊介绍：
Pain and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of pain therapies and pain-related devices. Studies relating to diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged.
Areas of focus include, but are not limited to, acute pain, cancer pain, chronic pain, headache and migraine, neuropathic pain, opioids, palliative care and pain ethics, peri- and post-operative pain as well as rheumatic pain and fibromyalgia.
The journal is of interest to a broad audience of pharmaceutical and healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, case reports, trial protocols, short communications such as commentaries and editorials, and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from around the world. Pain and Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
