Neck or Shoulder? Establishing Consensus for Spine Screening in Patients with Shoulder Pain: an International Modified Delphi Study.

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1093/ptj/pzae133
Néstor Requejo-Salinas, Rubén Fernández-Matías, Angela Cadogan, Rachel Chester, Jean-Sébastien Roy, Filip Struyf, Marcus Bateman, Simon Balster, Melina Nevoeiro Haik, Amee L Seitz, Leanne Bisset, Paula Rezende Camargo, Jean-Michel Brismée, Stephen May, Tom Walker, Craig Wassinger, Ross Lenssen, Jared K Powell, Karen McCreesh, Jo Gibson, Paula M Ludewig, Roy La Touche, Enrique Lluch-Girbés
{"title":"Neck or Shoulder? Establishing Consensus for Spine Screening in Patients with Shoulder Pain: an International Modified Delphi Study.","authors":"Néstor Requejo-Salinas, Rubén Fernández-Matías, Angela Cadogan, Rachel Chester, Jean-Sébastien Roy, Filip Struyf, Marcus Bateman, Simon Balster, Melina Nevoeiro Haik, Amee L Seitz, Leanne Bisset, Paula Rezende Camargo, Jean-Michel Brismée, Stephen May, Tom Walker, Craig Wassinger, Ross Lenssen, Jared K Powell, Karen McCreesh, Jo Gibson, Paula M Ludewig, Roy La Touche, Enrique Lluch-Girbés","doi":"10.1093/ptj/pzae133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is no established consensus for screening the spine in patients with shoulder pain. The aim of this study was to explore the role of the spine in shoulder pain and generate a set of recommendations for assessing the potential involvement of the spine in patients with shoulder pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified Delphi study was conducted through use of an international shoulder physical therapist's expert panel. Three domains (clinical reasoning, history, physical examination) were evaluated using a Likert scale, with consensus defined as Aiken Validity Index ≥0.7.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two physical therapists participated. Consensus was reached on a total of 30 items: clinical reasoning (n = 9), history (n = 13), and physical examination (n = 8). The statement that spinal and shoulder disorders can coexist, sometimes influencing each other and at other times remaining independent issues, along with the concept of radiating pain as an explanatory phenomenon for the spine contribution to shoulder pain, achieved the highest degree of consensus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>International physical therapists shoulder experts reached consensus on key aspects when screening the spine in people with shoulder pain, including consideration of the distal location of symptoms relative to the shoulder, the presence or previous history of neck pain, the changes in symptoms related to neck movements, and the presence of neuropathic-like symptoms. They also acknowledged the importance of assessing active cervical or cervicothoracic movements and the usefulness of the Spurling test and symptom modification techniques applied to the spine.</p>","PeriodicalId":20093,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzae133","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: There is no established consensus for screening the spine in patients with shoulder pain. The aim of this study was to explore the role of the spine in shoulder pain and generate a set of recommendations for assessing the potential involvement of the spine in patients with shoulder pain.

Methods: A modified Delphi study was conducted through use of an international shoulder physical therapist's expert panel. Three domains (clinical reasoning, history, physical examination) were evaluated using a Likert scale, with consensus defined as Aiken Validity Index ≥0.7.

Results: Twenty-two physical therapists participated. Consensus was reached on a total of 30 items: clinical reasoning (n = 9), history (n = 13), and physical examination (n = 8). The statement that spinal and shoulder disorders can coexist, sometimes influencing each other and at other times remaining independent issues, along with the concept of radiating pain as an explanatory phenomenon for the spine contribution to shoulder pain, achieved the highest degree of consensus.

Conclusion: International physical therapists shoulder experts reached consensus on key aspects when screening the spine in people with shoulder pain, including consideration of the distal location of symptoms relative to the shoulder, the presence or previous history of neck pain, the changes in symptoms related to neck movements, and the presence of neuropathic-like symptoms. They also acknowledged the importance of assessing active cervical or cervicothoracic movements and the usefulness of the Spurling test and symptom modification techniques applied to the spine.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颈部还是肩部?建立肩痛患者脊柱筛查共识:国际修正德尔菲研究
目的:对于肩痛患者的脊柱筛查,目前尚未达成共识。本研究旨在探讨脊柱在肩痛中的作用,并为评估肩痛患者脊柱可能受累的情况提出一套建议:方法:通过国际肩部物理治疗师专家小组进行了一项改良德尔菲研究。采用李克特量表对三个领域(临床推理、病史、体格检查)进行评估,艾肯有效性指数≥0.7即为达成共识:结果:22 名物理治疗师参加了此次活动。结果:22 名物理治疗师参加了此次调查,共就 30 个项目达成共识:临床推理(9 个)、病史(13 个)和体格检查(8 个)。脊柱疾病和肩部疾病可同时存在,有时相互影响,有时又各自独立,这一说法以及放射痛作为脊柱导致肩部疼痛的一种解释现象的概念获得了最高程度的共识:国际物理治疗师肩部专家在肩痛患者脊柱筛查的关键方面达成了共识,包括考虑症状相对于肩部的远端位置、颈部疼痛的存在或既往史、与颈部运动相关的症状变化以及神经病理性症状的存在。他们还承认评估颈椎或颈胸椎活动的重要性,以及应用于脊柱的斯普林测试和症状调整技术的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Therapy
Physical Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy (PTJ) engages and inspires an international readership on topics related to physical therapy. As the leading international journal for research in physical therapy and related fields, PTJ publishes innovative and highly relevant content for both clinicians and scientists and uses a variety of interactive approaches to communicate that content, with the expressed purpose of improving patient care. PTJ"s circulation in 2008 is more than 72,000. Its 2007 impact factor was 2.152. The mean time from submission to first decision is 58 days. Time from acceptance to publication online is less than or equal to 3 months and from acceptance to publication in print is less than or equal to 5 months.
期刊最新文献
"It's Just Really Important for us all to be on the Same Page": Qualitative Evaluation of Factors that Influence Written Mobility Communication. From Knowledge to Action: Fostering Advocacy Skills for Planetary Health in Physical Therapy. Fine Motor Impairment and Its Impact on Social Outcomes in Survivors of Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study. Short-Term Powered Mobility Intervention is Associated With Improvements in Development and Participation for Young Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Determinants of Longitudinal Changes in Exercise Capacity in Patients with Independent Functioning on Hemodialysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1