Screening for PTSD in police officers: Preliminary psychometric properties of the adapted primary care PTSD screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5 [0-20]) screener.

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1037/tra0001741
Lucas D Baker, Michael L Dolezal, Jason T Goodson, Andrew J Smith
{"title":"Screening for PTSD in police officers: Preliminary psychometric properties of the adapted primary care PTSD screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5 [0-20]) screener.","authors":"Lucas D Baker, Michael L Dolezal, Jason T Goodson, Andrew J Smith","doi":"10.1037/tra0001741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Police officers are at heightened risk for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) due to frequent exposure to traumatic stressors. Early identification of PTSD symptoms is crucial for timely intervention. However, stigma and low utilization of mental health services create barriers to accessing care, which can be improved through the use of accessible, brief, and efficient screening instruments. The Primary Care PTSD for <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition (DSM-5;</i> PC-PTSD-5) scale is a brief, five-item self-report questionnaire demonstrating good reliability and validity in the identification of probable PTSD among veterans and civilians but has not yet been examined in first responder populations.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this study, we assess the psychometric properties of an adapted version of the measure (PC-PTSD-5 [0-20]) in a sample of U.S. police officers (<i>N</i> = 394), focusing on reliability, structural validity, measurement invariance, and convergent and discriminant validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Internal consistency of the PC-PTSD-5 [0-20] was good (α = .87), with uniform item-total correlations ranging from .78 to .83. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a single-factor structure (comparative fit index = 0.97, Tucker-Lewis index = 0.94, root-mean-square error of approximation = 0.12 (90% CI [.08, .16]), standardized root-mean-square residual = 0.03) that was invariant between male and female officers, <i>χ</i>²(9, <i>N</i> = 394) = 2.72, <i>p</i> = .974, and across years of service, <i>χ</i>²(9, <i>N</i> = 394) = 9.02, <i>p</i> = .436, providing evidence of construct validity. The measure also demonstrated convergent and discriminant validity, showing varying degrees of correlational strength with 20 operational stressors, the strongest of which were with traumatic stressors (<i>r</i> = .52, <i>p</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest the PC-PTSD-5 [0-20] may be a valuable tool for identifying PTSD symptoms in police officers, benefiting both clinical and research applications. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20982,"journal":{"name":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001741","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Police officers are at heightened risk for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) due to frequent exposure to traumatic stressors. Early identification of PTSD symptoms is crucial for timely intervention. However, stigma and low utilization of mental health services create barriers to accessing care, which can be improved through the use of accessible, brief, and efficient screening instruments. The Primary Care PTSD for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition (DSM-5; PC-PTSD-5) scale is a brief, five-item self-report questionnaire demonstrating good reliability and validity in the identification of probable PTSD among veterans and civilians but has not yet been examined in first responder populations.

Method: In this study, we assess the psychometric properties of an adapted version of the measure (PC-PTSD-5 [0-20]) in a sample of U.S. police officers (N = 394), focusing on reliability, structural validity, measurement invariance, and convergent and discriminant validity.

Results: Internal consistency of the PC-PTSD-5 [0-20] was good (α = .87), with uniform item-total correlations ranging from .78 to .83. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a single-factor structure (comparative fit index = 0.97, Tucker-Lewis index = 0.94, root-mean-square error of approximation = 0.12 (90% CI [.08, .16]), standardized root-mean-square residual = 0.03) that was invariant between male and female officers, χ²(9, N = 394) = 2.72, p = .974, and across years of service, χ²(9, N = 394) = 9.02, p = .436, providing evidence of construct validity. The measure also demonstrated convergent and discriminant validity, showing varying degrees of correlational strength with 20 operational stressors, the strongest of which were with traumatic stressors (r = .52, p < .001).

Conclusions: These findings suggest the PC-PTSD-5 [0-20] may be a valuable tool for identifying PTSD symptoms in police officers, benefiting both clinical and research applications. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
警官创伤后应激障碍筛查:针对 DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5 [0-20])筛查器改编的初级保健创伤后应激障碍筛查的初步心理计量特性。
目的:由于经常面临创伤性压力源,警察罹患创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的风险很高。及早发现创伤后应激障碍症状对于及时干预至关重要。然而,心理健康服务的污名化和低利用率造成了获得护理的障碍,而使用方便、简短、高效的筛查工具则可以改善这一问题。创伤后应激障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5;PC-PTSD-5)初级护理创伤后应激障碍量表是一个简短的五项自我报告问卷,在退伍军人和平民中识别可能的创伤后应激障碍方面具有良好的可靠性和有效性,但尚未在第一响应者人群中进行过研究:在本研究中,我们在美国警官样本(N = 394)中评估了改编版量表(PC-PTSD-5 [0-20])的心理测量特性,重点关注信度、结构效度、测量不变性、收敛效度和区分效度:结果:PC-PTSD-5[0-20]的内部一致性良好(α = .87),统一的项目-总相关系数在 0.78 至 0.83 之间。确认性因素分析支持单因素结构(比较拟合指数 = 0.97,Tucker-Lewis 指数 = 0.94,均方根近似误差 = 0.12 (90% CI [.08, .16]),标准化均方根残差 = 0.03)。χ²(9,N = 394) = 2.72,p = .974,并且在不同的任职年限之间,χ²(9,N = 394) = 9.02,p = .436,都是不变的。该量表还显示了收敛性和判别性有效性,与 20 种操作性压力源存在不同程度的相关性,其中与创伤性压力源的相关性最强(r = .52,p < .001):这些研究结果表明,PC-PTSD-5[0-20]可能是识别警官创伤后应激障碍症状的重要工具,对临床和研究应用都有益处。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
427
期刊介绍: Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy publishes empirical research on the psychological effects of trauma. The journal is intended to be a forum for an interdisciplinary discussion on trauma, blending science, theory, practice, and policy. The journal publishes empirical research on a wide range of trauma-related topics, including: -Psychological treatments and effects -Promotion of education about effects of and treatment for trauma -Assessment and diagnosis of trauma -Pathophysiology of trauma reactions -Health services (delivery of services to trauma populations) -Epidemiological studies and risk factor studies -Neuroimaging studies -Trauma and cultural competence
期刊最新文献
Resilience in the aftermath of trauma: Classes of adjustment in at-risk youth. The latent transition of posttraumatic stress disorder and growth among adolescents surviving Jiuzhaigou earthquake. How trauma is represented on social media: Analysis of #trauma content on TikTok. Emotion dysregulation and posttraumatic stress symptom severity: The influence of cortisol reactivity following idiographic emotion inductions. The role of maternal postmigration living difficulties in intergenerational trauma transmission among asylum-seeker mother-child dyads: Exploring complex posttraumatic stress disorder as a mechanism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1