Needle stick injuries and post-exposure prophylaxis practices among healthcare personnel working at tertiary care hospitals in Punjab, Pakistan.

Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.3233/JRS-240010
Muhammad Kiddeer, Abdul Basit, Tawseef Ahmad, Imran Masood
{"title":"Needle stick injuries and post-exposure prophylaxis practices among healthcare personnel working at tertiary care hospitals in Punjab, Pakistan.","authors":"Muhammad Kiddeer, Abdul Basit, Tawseef Ahmad, Imran Masood","doi":"10.3233/JRS-240010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare workers face a high risk of blood-borne infections due to needlestick injuries, especially in developing countries like Pakistan.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of needlestick injuries, reporting practices, and post-exposure prophylaxis measures among healthcare personnel in tertiary care hospitals in Punjab.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted from May to July 2019. Data were collected from healthcare personnel working in teaching hospitals across six randomly selected cities of Punjab. Data were collected from 600 healthcare personnel using a pretested, self-administered questionnaire, employing stratified random sampling to ensure representative sampling. Descriptive statistics were applied, and differences in needlestick injuries across demographic segments were assessed using the Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis H tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 600 respondents, 533 returned the complete questionnaire, yielding a response rate of 88.8%. The majority of respondents were female (n = 341, 64.2%). The mean years of service was 5.58 (±5.78), with most participants falling in the 0.5-5 years category (n = 338, 66.4%). The prevalence of self-reported needlestick injuries in the last six months was 35.25%. Most injuries occurred during sampling (n = 95, 35.85%), followed by recapping (n = 63, 23.77%). Reporting of needlestick injuries to the respective department was poor, with only 82 (21.87%) injuries reported. The frequency of needlestick injuries differed significantly across profession, working department, and education categories (p < 0.05). Sanitary staff were more likely to sustain needlestick injuries during garbage collection and waste handling. Post-exposure screening for blood-borne infections was received by 79 (42.93%) individuals, and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) was administered to 67 (36.41%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The high prevalence of needlestick injuries among healthcare personnel occurred primarily during sampling and recapping. Reporting of NSIs was inadequate, and post-exposure testing and prophylaxis practices were substandard. Enhanced policies and protocols are necessary for effective NSI surveillance and the administration of pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/JRS-240010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Healthcare workers face a high risk of blood-borne infections due to needlestick injuries, especially in developing countries like Pakistan.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of needlestick injuries, reporting practices, and post-exposure prophylaxis measures among healthcare personnel in tertiary care hospitals in Punjab.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from May to July 2019. Data were collected from healthcare personnel working in teaching hospitals across six randomly selected cities of Punjab. Data were collected from 600 healthcare personnel using a pretested, self-administered questionnaire, employing stratified random sampling to ensure representative sampling. Descriptive statistics were applied, and differences in needlestick injuries across demographic segments were assessed using the Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis H tests.

Results: Among the 600 respondents, 533 returned the complete questionnaire, yielding a response rate of 88.8%. The majority of respondents were female (n = 341, 64.2%). The mean years of service was 5.58 (±5.78), with most participants falling in the 0.5-5 years category (n = 338, 66.4%). The prevalence of self-reported needlestick injuries in the last six months was 35.25%. Most injuries occurred during sampling (n = 95, 35.85%), followed by recapping (n = 63, 23.77%). Reporting of needlestick injuries to the respective department was poor, with only 82 (21.87%) injuries reported. The frequency of needlestick injuries differed significantly across profession, working department, and education categories (p < 0.05). Sanitary staff were more likely to sustain needlestick injuries during garbage collection and waste handling. Post-exposure screening for blood-borne infections was received by 79 (42.93%) individuals, and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) was administered to 67 (36.41%).

Conclusion: The high prevalence of needlestick injuries among healthcare personnel occurred primarily during sampling and recapping. Reporting of NSIs was inadequate, and post-exposure testing and prophylaxis practices were substandard. Enhanced policies and protocols are necessary for effective NSI surveillance and the administration of pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
巴基斯坦旁遮普省三甲医院医护人员的针刺伤和暴露后预防措施。
背景:在巴基斯坦等发展中国家,医护人员面临着针刺伤导致的血液传播感染的高风险:医护人员面临着因针刺伤导致血源性感染的高风险,尤其是在巴基斯坦这样的发展中国家:本研究旨在评估旁遮普省三级医院医护人员的针刺伤发生率、报告方法和暴露后预防措施:于 2019 年 5 月至 7 月开展了一项横断面研究。数据收集对象是在旁遮普省随机选取的六个城市的教学医院工作的医护人员。采用分层随机抽样的方式,通过预先测试的自填式问卷从 600 名医护人员中收集数据,以确保抽样的代表性。研究采用了描述性统计方法,并使用 Mann-Whitney U 和 Kruskal-Wallis H 检验法评估了不同人口统计群体在针刺伤害方面的差异:在 600 名受访者中,有 533 人交回了完整的调查问卷,回复率为 88.8%。大多数受访者为女性(n = 341,64.2%)。平均工龄为 5.58 (±5.78)年,大多数受访者的工龄在 0.5-5 年之间(n = 338,66.4%)。在过去六个月中,自我报告的针刺伤害发生率为 35.25%。大多数伤害发生在取样过程中(95 人,占 35.85%),其次是覆膜(63 人,占 23.77%)。向相关部门报告针刺伤害的情况不佳,仅报告了 82 起(21.87%)。不同职业、工作部门和教育程度的人员发生针刺伤的频率差异很大(P < 0.05)。卫生工作人员在收集垃圾和处理废物时更容易受到针刺伤害。79人(42.93%)接受了暴露后血源性感染筛查,67人(36.41%)接受了暴露后预防(PEP)治疗:结论:医护人员的针刺伤发生率较高,主要发生在采样和复盖过程中。NSI 报告不足,暴露后检测和预防措施不达标。有必要加强政策和规程,以有效监控 NSI 并实施接触前和接触后预防。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1