Delayed onset of cognitive terminal decline in later born cohorts: Evidence from a longitudinal study of two cohorts born 29-years apart.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1037/pag0000846
Valgeir Thorvaldsson, Ingmar Skoog, Boo Johansson
{"title":"Delayed onset of cognitive terminal decline in later born cohorts: Evidence from a longitudinal study of two cohorts born 29-years apart.","authors":"Valgeir Thorvaldsson, Ingmar Skoog, Boo Johansson","doi":"10.1037/pag0000846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, we evaluated birth cohort (i.e., generational) differences in the onset and rate of acceleration in cognitive decline prior to death (i.e., terminal decline [TD]). We obtained data from two cohorts, born in 1901-1902 (<i>n</i> = 755, 64% females) and 1930 (<i>n</i> = 347, 48% females), identified and sampled at age 70 from the same city population and assessed on the same cognitive tests at ages 70, 75, 79, 85, and 88. The 1901-1902 cohort was additionally assessed at ages 90, 92, 95, 97, 99, and 100. The outcome was defined at each measurement occasion by a composite score of three cognitive tests assessing spatial ability, perceptual and motor speed, and reasoning. Date of death was obtained from population register, with the last update in April 2023, covering over 99% and 38% of the cohort members, respectively. We fitted a random TD change point model to the data while accounting for sex and education. Findings revealed expected TD onset (as conditioned on male with formal education) 5.17 (95% highest density interval [2.54, 8.05]) years prior to death in the 1901-1902 cohort, with an acceleration in rate of decline by a factor of 4.43 within the TD phase. This estimate was delayed by 2.53 (95% highest density interval [5.68, 0.10]) years in the 1930 cohort, with an acceleration by a factor of 5.16 within the TD phase. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to present evidence indicating that today's birth cohort experience, on average, a shorter TD phase in comparison to earlier born cohorts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000846","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated birth cohort (i.e., generational) differences in the onset and rate of acceleration in cognitive decline prior to death (i.e., terminal decline [TD]). We obtained data from two cohorts, born in 1901-1902 (n = 755, 64% females) and 1930 (n = 347, 48% females), identified and sampled at age 70 from the same city population and assessed on the same cognitive tests at ages 70, 75, 79, 85, and 88. The 1901-1902 cohort was additionally assessed at ages 90, 92, 95, 97, 99, and 100. The outcome was defined at each measurement occasion by a composite score of three cognitive tests assessing spatial ability, perceptual and motor speed, and reasoning. Date of death was obtained from population register, with the last update in April 2023, covering over 99% and 38% of the cohort members, respectively. We fitted a random TD change point model to the data while accounting for sex and education. Findings revealed expected TD onset (as conditioned on male with formal education) 5.17 (95% highest density interval [2.54, 8.05]) years prior to death in the 1901-1902 cohort, with an acceleration in rate of decline by a factor of 4.43 within the TD phase. This estimate was delayed by 2.53 (95% highest density interval [5.68, 0.10]) years in the 1930 cohort, with an acceleration by a factor of 5.16 within the TD phase. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to present evidence indicating that today's birth cohort experience, on average, a shorter TD phase in comparison to earlier born cohorts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
出生较晚的人群认知能力终末衰退的起始时间较晚:对相隔 29 年出生的两个群体进行纵向研究的证据。
在这项研究中,我们评估了出生队列(即世代)在死亡前认知能力衰退(即终末衰退 [TD])的开始和加速率方面的差异。我们从 1901-1902 年(n = 755,64% 为女性)和 1930 年(n = 347,48% 为女性)出生的两个队列中获得了数据,这两个队列在 70 岁时从同一个城市人口中识别和抽样,并在 70、75、79、85 和 88 岁时接受相同的认知测试评估。此外,还在 90、92、95、97、99 和 100 岁时对 1901-1902 年组群进行了评估。每次测量的结果均由三项认知测试的综合得分确定,这三项测试分别评估空间能力、感知和运动速度以及推理能力。死亡日期从人口登记册中获得,最近一次更新是在2023年4月,分别覆盖了队列中超过99%和38%的成员。我们对数据进行了随机 TD 变点模型拟合,同时考虑了性别和教育程度。结果显示,在 1901-1902 年队列中,预计 TD 发病时间(以受过正规教育的男性为条件)比死亡时间早 5.17 年(95% 最高密度区间 [2.54, 8.05]),在 TD 阶段,下降速度加快了 4.43 倍。在 1930 年队列中,这一估计值延迟了 2.53 年(95% 最高密度区间 [5.68, 0.10]),在 TD 阶段加速了 5.16 倍。据我们所知,这是首次有证据表明,与较早出生的人群相比,今天出生的人群平均经历的 TD 阶段较短的研究。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊最新文献
Current Review on Nanophytomedicines in the Treatment of Oral Cancer: Recent Trends and Treatment Prospects. Recent Updates on Phytopharmaceuticals-Based Novel Phytosomal Systems and Their Clinical Trial Status: A Translational Perspective. [Corrigendum] Tripartite motif‑containing 11 regulates the proliferation and apoptosis of breast cancer cells. [Retracted] Glutathione peroxidase 2 overexpression promotes malignant progression and cisplatin resistance of KRAS‑mutated lung cancer cells. [Retracted] Stimulation of peroxisome proliferator‑activated receptor γ inhibits estrogen receptor α transcriptional activity in endometrial carcinoma cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1