Lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) as a prognostic factor in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer treated with first-line chemoimmunotherapy.
Elena Herranz-Bayo, Luis Enrique Chara-Velarde, Javier Cassinello-Espinosa, Vicente Gimeno-Ballester, Ángel Artal-Cortés, Alba Moratiel-Pellitero, Arancha Alcácera-López, Fátima Navarro-Expósito, Blanca Riesco-Montes, Manuel Clemente-Andujar
{"title":"Lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) as a prognostic factor in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer treated with first-line chemoimmunotherapy.","authors":"Elena Herranz-Bayo, Luis Enrique Chara-Velarde, Javier Cassinello-Espinosa, Vicente Gimeno-Ballester, Ángel Artal-Cortés, Alba Moratiel-Pellitero, Arancha Alcácera-López, Fátima Navarro-Expósito, Blanca Riesco-Montes, Manuel Clemente-Andujar","doi":"10.1007/s12094-024-03690-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) is a biomarker that combines the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) value and the derived neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (dNLR). Its prognostic ability has been reported in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with immunotherapy. In the context of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) with chemoimmunotherapy, its role remains to be determined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective, multicenter study of patients with ES-SCLC who received atezolizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment was conducted. 101 patients were divided into three groups: LIPI good (n = 33), LIPI intermediate (n = 41), and LIPI poor (n = 27). The Kaplan-Meier method was used for analysis of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), using the log-rank test for comparisons. Univariate and multivariate Cox models were developed to assess the LIPI as an independent predictor of survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The good LIPI group had a significantly longer median PFS than the intermediate and poor LIPI groups: 9.6 vs 5.4 vs 5.2 months, respectively (p < 0.001). Significant differences in OS between good, intermediate, and poor LIPI were also observed, with median OS of 23.4 vs 9.8 vs 6.0 months, respectively (p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis for PFS identified liver metastases and intermediate and poor LIPI as worse prognostic factors (p < 0.050). For OS, a worse prognosis was confirmed in both the intermediate LIPI group (HR: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.07-4.41, p = 0.031) and the poor LIPI group (HR: 5.40, 95% CI: 2.64-11.07, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with ES-SCLC treated with chemoimmunotherapy, an intermediate and poor pretreatment LIPI score was associated with worse PFS and OS prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":50685,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-024-03690-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) is a biomarker that combines the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) value and the derived neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (dNLR). Its prognostic ability has been reported in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with immunotherapy. In the context of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) with chemoimmunotherapy, its role remains to be determined.
Methods: A retrospective, multicenter study of patients with ES-SCLC who received atezolizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment was conducted. 101 patients were divided into three groups: LIPI good (n = 33), LIPI intermediate (n = 41), and LIPI poor (n = 27). The Kaplan-Meier method was used for analysis of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), using the log-rank test for comparisons. Univariate and multivariate Cox models were developed to assess the LIPI as an independent predictor of survival.
Results: The good LIPI group had a significantly longer median PFS than the intermediate and poor LIPI groups: 9.6 vs 5.4 vs 5.2 months, respectively (p < 0.001). Significant differences in OS between good, intermediate, and poor LIPI were also observed, with median OS of 23.4 vs 9.8 vs 6.0 months, respectively (p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis for PFS identified liver metastases and intermediate and poor LIPI as worse prognostic factors (p < 0.050). For OS, a worse prognosis was confirmed in both the intermediate LIPI group (HR: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.07-4.41, p = 0.031) and the poor LIPI group (HR: 5.40, 95% CI: 2.64-11.07, p < 0.001).
Conclusions: In patients with ES-SCLC treated with chemoimmunotherapy, an intermediate and poor pretreatment LIPI score was associated with worse PFS and OS prognosis.
简介肺免疫预后指数(LIPI)是一种结合了乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)值和衍生中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值(dNLR)的生物标志物。据报道,该指标对接受免疫疗法的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)具有预后能力。在采用化疗免疫疗法的广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)中,其作用仍有待确定:对接受阿特珠单抗联合化疗作为一线治疗的ES-SCLC患者进行了一项多中心回顾性研究。101名患者被分为三组:LIPI良好组(33人)、LIPI中等组(41人)和LIPI较差组(27人)。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法分析总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS),使用 log-rank 检验进行比较。建立了单变量和多变量Cox模型,以评估LIPI作为生存期独立预测因子的作用:结果:LIPI良好组的中位生存期明显长于LIPI中等组和LIPI不良组:分别为9.6个月 vs 5.4个月 vs 5.2个月(P在接受化疗免疫治疗的ES-SCLC患者中,治疗前LIPI评分中等和较差与较差的PFS和OS预后相关。
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Translational Oncology is an international journal devoted to fostering interaction between experimental and clinical oncology. It covers all aspects of research on cancer, from the more basic discoveries dealing with both cell and molecular biology of tumour cells, to the most advanced clinical assays of conventional and new drugs. In addition, the journal has a strong commitment to facilitating the transfer of knowledge from the basic laboratory to the clinical practice, with the publication of educational series devoted to closing the gap between molecular and clinical oncologists. Molecular biology of tumours, identification of new targets for cancer therapy, and new technologies for research and treatment of cancer are the major themes covered by the educational series. Full research articles on a broad spectrum of subjects, including the molecular and cellular bases of disease, aetiology, pathophysiology, pathology, epidemiology, clinical features, and the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of cancer, will be considered for publication.