Associations Between Integration and Patient Experience in Hospital-Based Health Systems: An Exploration of Horizontal and Vertical Forms of Integration.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Healthcare Management Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1097/JHM-D-23-00266
Jillian S Torres, Mark L Diana
{"title":"Associations Between Integration and Patient Experience in Hospital-Based Health Systems: An Exploration of Horizontal and Vertical Forms of Integration.","authors":"Jillian S Torres, Mark L Diana","doi":"10.1097/JHM-D-23-00266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Goal: </strong>The U.S. hospital sector is experiencing record levels of integration, with more than half of U.S. physicians and nearly three quarters of all hospitals affiliated with one of slightly more than 630 health systems. However, there is growing evidence to suggest that health system integration is associated with more expensive and lower quality care. The goal of this research is to explore the associations between forms of health system integration and hospital patient experience scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-section of data for the year 2019 was assembled and analyzed from the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) patient experience survey. Data from the Compendium of US Health Systems, published by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), and the American Hospital Association (AHA) Annual Survey were used to obtain independent variables and hospital-level covariates. A series of multivariable regressions was used to explore the associations between forms of health system integration and hospital patient experience scores across three domains: overall impression of the hospital; experiences with staff; and the hospital environment. Forms of both horizontal integration (i.e., number of hospitals owned by hospital-based health systems) and vertical integration (i.e., physician-hospital integration, nursing home ownership, accountable care organization [ACO] participation, group purchasing, contract management, offering insurance products, and investor ownership) were explored.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>Although horizontal integration was not associated with any meaningful differences in patient experience scores, health systems with physician-hospital integration were associated with overall impression scores that were 2 percentage points higher than systems without physician integration. Similarly, contract management and membership in a group purchasing organization were associated with overall impression and environment scores that were 2 to 3 percentage points higher than hospitals that did not engage in those forms of integration. By contrast, investor ownership was associated with a 5% lower score for overall patient experience compared with other forms of ownership.</p><p><strong>Practical applications: </strong>The findings of this study suggest that hospitals in more vertically integrated systems may have higher patient experience scores than independent hospitals and those that belong exclusively to horizontally integrated systems. Thus, there are elements of vertical integration that could benefit patients and be worth pursuing. Conversely, higher degrees of horizontal integration in the form of multihospital ownership may not be of any benefit to patients and should be pursued with caution.</p>","PeriodicalId":51633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Management","volume":"69 5","pages":"321-334"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHM-D-23-00266","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Goal: The U.S. hospital sector is experiencing record levels of integration, with more than half of U.S. physicians and nearly three quarters of all hospitals affiliated with one of slightly more than 630 health systems. However, there is growing evidence to suggest that health system integration is associated with more expensive and lower quality care. The goal of this research is to explore the associations between forms of health system integration and hospital patient experience scores.

Methods: A cross-section of data for the year 2019 was assembled and analyzed from the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) patient experience survey. Data from the Compendium of US Health Systems, published by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), and the American Hospital Association (AHA) Annual Survey were used to obtain independent variables and hospital-level covariates. A series of multivariable regressions was used to explore the associations between forms of health system integration and hospital patient experience scores across three domains: overall impression of the hospital; experiences with staff; and the hospital environment. Forms of both horizontal integration (i.e., number of hospitals owned by hospital-based health systems) and vertical integration (i.e., physician-hospital integration, nursing home ownership, accountable care organization [ACO] participation, group purchasing, contract management, offering insurance products, and investor ownership) were explored.

Principal findings: Although horizontal integration was not associated with any meaningful differences in patient experience scores, health systems with physician-hospital integration were associated with overall impression scores that were 2 percentage points higher than systems without physician integration. Similarly, contract management and membership in a group purchasing organization were associated with overall impression and environment scores that were 2 to 3 percentage points higher than hospitals that did not engage in those forms of integration. By contrast, investor ownership was associated with a 5% lower score for overall patient experience compared with other forms of ownership.

Practical applications: The findings of this study suggest that hospitals in more vertically integrated systems may have higher patient experience scores than independent hospitals and those that belong exclusively to horizontally integrated systems. Thus, there are elements of vertical integration that could benefit patients and be worth pursuing. Conversely, higher degrees of horizontal integration in the form of multihospital ownership may not be of any benefit to patients and should be pursued with caution.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医院医疗系统整合与患者体验之间的关联:对横向和纵向整合形式的探讨》。
目标:美国医院行业正在经历创纪录水平的整合,半数以上的美国医生和近四分之三的医院隶属于略多于 630 家医疗系统中的一家。然而,越来越多的证据表明,医疗系统的整合会带来更昂贵、更低质量的医疗服务。本研究旨在探讨医疗系统整合形式与医院患者体验评分之间的关联:收集并分析了 2019 年医院消费者医疗保健提供者和系统评估(HCAHPS)患者体验调查的横截面数据。医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)发布的《美国医疗系统汇编》和美国医院协会(AHA)年度调查的数据被用来获取自变量和医院层面的协变量。通过一系列多变量回归,我们探讨了医疗系统整合形式与医院患者体验得分之间在以下三个方面的关联:对医院的总体印象、与员工相处的经历以及医院环境。研究探讨了横向整合(即医院医疗系统拥有的医院数量)和纵向整合(即医生-医院整合、养老院所有权、参与责任医疗组织[ACO]、集团采购、合同管理、提供保险产品和投资者所有权)的形式:主要研究结果:虽然横向整合与患者体验评分的任何有意义的差异无关,但与未进行医生整合的医疗系统相比,进行了医生-医院整合的医疗系统的总体印象评分要高出 2 个百分点。同样,实行合同管理和加入集团采购组织的医院,其总体印象分和环境分要比没有实行这些形式整合的医院高出 2 到 3 个百分点。相比之下,投资者所有权与其他所有权形式相比,患者总体体验得分低 5%:本研究的结果表明,与独立医院和完全属于横向整合系统的医院相比,纵向整合程度较高的系统内医院的患者体验得分可能更高。因此,纵向整合的一些要素可能会使患者受益,值得追求。相反,以多医院所有制形式出现的更高程度的横向整合可能不会给患者带来任何好处,因此应谨慎从事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Healthcare Management
Journal of Healthcare Management HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The Journal of Healthcare Management is the official journal of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Six times per year, JHM offers timely healthcare management articles that inform and guide executives, managers, educators, and researchers. JHM also contains regular columns written by experts and practitioners in the field that discuss management-related topics and industry trends. Each issue presents an interview with a leading executive.
期刊最新文献
A New Era for the Patient Safety Imperative. An Exploratory Study of Dynamic Capabilities and Performance Improvement in Hospitals. Associations Between Integration and Patient Experience in Hospital-Based Health Systems: An Exploration of Horizontal and Vertical Forms of Integration. Associations Between Organizational Support, Burnout, and Professional Fulfillment Among US Physicians During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Burke Kline, DHA, FACHE, CHFP, CEO, Jefferson Community Health & Life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1