Barriers and Facilitators to Sustainable Technology Implementation in Care for People With Disabilities—Real World Data From a Three-Year Implementation Programme

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1111/jar.13298
Sanne van der Weegen, Agnes van der Poel, Eva Kagenaar, Ilse Bierhoff, Brigitte Boon
{"title":"Barriers and Facilitators to Sustainable Technology Implementation in Care for People With Disabilities—Real World Data From a Three-Year Implementation Programme","authors":"Sanne van der Weegen,&nbsp;Agnes van der Poel,&nbsp;Eva Kagenaar,&nbsp;Ilse Bierhoff,&nbsp;Brigitte Boon","doi":"10.1111/jar.13298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Implementation issues often impede the realisation of the potential benefits of technology in disability care organisations for people with disabilities. Therefore, we conducted a longitudinal study to gain insights into the barriers and facilitators to implementation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>From 2019 to 2022, data were collected using questionnaires and interviews during 28 implementation projects in 26 disability care organisations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Barriers and facilitators were identified using 9 themes and 26 subthemes. The main themes identified were finances, disability care organisations, internal collaborations, external collaborations, technology, care staff, project teams, people with disabilities, and context. Most factors mentioned as barriers in one organisation were mentioned as facilitators in others. This suggests that barriers can be resolved to improve implementation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>A large number of barriers and facilitators spanning the organisation suggests that the implementation of technology should be considered an organisational reform. Acting upon them is crucial for the successful implementation of technology.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51403,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jar.13298","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jar.13298","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Implementation issues often impede the realisation of the potential benefits of technology in disability care organisations for people with disabilities. Therefore, we conducted a longitudinal study to gain insights into the barriers and facilitators to implementation.

Methods

From 2019 to 2022, data were collected using questionnaires and interviews during 28 implementation projects in 26 disability care organisations.

Results

Barriers and facilitators were identified using 9 themes and 26 subthemes. The main themes identified were finances, disability care organisations, internal collaborations, external collaborations, technology, care staff, project teams, people with disabilities, and context. Most factors mentioned as barriers in one organisation were mentioned as facilitators in others. This suggests that barriers can be resolved to improve implementation.

Conclusion

A large number of barriers and facilitators spanning the organisation suggests that the implementation of technology should be considered an organisational reform. Acting upon them is crucial for the successful implementation of technology.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
残疾人护理中可持续技术实施的障碍和促进因素--来自三年实施计划的真实世界数据。
背景:在残疾人护理机构中,实施问题往往会阻碍技术为残疾人带来的潜在益处的实现。因此,我们开展了一项纵向研究,以深入了解实施的障碍和促进因素:从 2019 年到 2022 年,在 26 家残疾人护理机构的 28 个实施项目中,我们通过问卷调查和访谈收集了数据:通过 9 个主题和 26 个次主题确定了障碍和促进因素。确定的主要主题包括资金、残疾人护理组织、内部协作、外部协作、技术、护理人员、项目团队、残疾人和背景。在一个组织中被视为障碍的大多数因素,在其他组织中被视为促进因素。这表明,可以通过解决障碍来改善实施情况:跨组织的大量障碍和促进因素表明,技术的实施应被视为一种组织改革。针对这些障碍采取行动对于成功实施技术至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: JARID is an international, peer-reviewed journal which draws together findings derived from original applied research in intellectual disabilities. The journal is an important forum for the dissemination of ideas to promote valued lifestyles for people with intellectual disabilities. It reports on research from the UK and overseas by authors from all relevant professional disciplines. It is aimed at an international, multi-disciplinary readership. Topics covered include community living, quality of life, challenging behaviour, communication, sexuality, medication, ageing, supported employment, family issues, mental health, physical health, autism, economic issues, social networks, staff stress, staff training, epidemiology and service provision.
期刊最新文献
Concurrent Validity of Abbreviated Walk Tests Among Adults With Mild to Moderate Intellectual Disability Adapting Complicated Grief Therapy for Use With People With Intellectual Disabilities: An Action Research Study Correction to “‘A Potentially Ticking Time Bomb’—Barriers for Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease in People With Intellectual Disabilities” Using a Capability Approach to Explore How People With Intellectual Disabilities Can Lead Flourishing Lives ‘It's Not Like a One-Way Street’: Using Photovoice to Understand How College Students With Intellectual Disability Experience Interdependence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1