Conservative Lymph Node Sampling Is Clinically Appropriate in Intestinal Resections Related to Nonneoplastic Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Chen Mayer, Tom Z Liang, Saman Karimi, Yujie Zhang, Tatianna Larman, Lysandra Voltaggio
{"title":"Conservative Lymph Node Sampling Is Clinically Appropriate in Intestinal Resections Related to Nonneoplastic Inflammatory Bowel Disease.","authors":"Chen Mayer, Tom Z Liang, Saman Karimi, Yujie Zhang, Tatianna Larman, Lysandra Voltaggio","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2024-0184-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>In this era of health care challenges, efficient resource use is crucial. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may undergo surgery owing to treatment-refractory disease or strictures. Unlike colorectal cancer resections, there are no guidelines for lymph node retrieval in nonmalignant IBD resections.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To assess the usefulness and cost-effectiveness of extensive lymph node examination in nonmalignant IBD resections.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 354 cases from 2011 to 2018 was conducted. Resections for suspected malignancy or lesions grossly suggestive of carcinoma were excluded. Patient data, resection type, lymph node count, and follow-up information were collected.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>Results showed 51% (180) of cases had 12 or more examined lymph nodes. Only 1 case (0.3%) revealed microscopic invasive carcinoma associated with stricture without metastasis to 26 examined lymph nodes. No metastatic disease was found among the 4972 evaluated lymph nodes. Estimated total savings were at least $19 812, with approximately 10.4 minutes saved on microscopic evaluation. During a mean 5.7-year follow-up, no patients developed metastatic disease from an intestinal primary tumor. Among the 20 deceased patients, cause of death was available for 14 patients (70%), of whom 11 (55%) died of nonneoplastic causes and 3 (15%) of nonintestinal malignancies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>While lymph node assessment is crucial in IBD-associated colorectal carcinoma, a colorectal cancer protocol-type lymph node search is unnecessary without clinical or gross pathologic suspicion. A conservative approach to lymph node sampling optimizes resources without compromising patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2024-0184-OA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context.—: In this era of health care challenges, efficient resource use is crucial. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may undergo surgery owing to treatment-refractory disease or strictures. Unlike colorectal cancer resections, there are no guidelines for lymph node retrieval in nonmalignant IBD resections.

Objective.—: To assess the usefulness and cost-effectiveness of extensive lymph node examination in nonmalignant IBD resections.

Design.—: A retrospective analysis of 354 cases from 2011 to 2018 was conducted. Resections for suspected malignancy or lesions grossly suggestive of carcinoma were excluded. Patient data, resection type, lymph node count, and follow-up information were collected.

Results.—: Results showed 51% (180) of cases had 12 or more examined lymph nodes. Only 1 case (0.3%) revealed microscopic invasive carcinoma associated with stricture without metastasis to 26 examined lymph nodes. No metastatic disease was found among the 4972 evaluated lymph nodes. Estimated total savings were at least $19 812, with approximately 10.4 minutes saved on microscopic evaluation. During a mean 5.7-year follow-up, no patients developed metastatic disease from an intestinal primary tumor. Among the 20 deceased patients, cause of death was available for 14 patients (70%), of whom 11 (55%) died of nonneoplastic causes and 3 (15%) of nonintestinal malignancies.

Conclusions.—: While lymph node assessment is crucial in IBD-associated colorectal carcinoma, a colorectal cancer protocol-type lymph node search is unnecessary without clinical or gross pathologic suspicion. A conservative approach to lymph node sampling optimizes resources without compromising patient care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在与非肿瘤性炎症性肠病相关的肠道切除术中,保守的淋巴结取样在临床上是适当的。
背景在这个医疗保健挑战重重的时代,有效利用资源至关重要。炎症性肠病(IBD)患者可能会因难治性疾病或狭窄而接受手术治疗。与结直肠癌切除术不同,目前还没有关于非恶性 IBD 切除术中淋巴结检索的指南:评估在非恶性 IBD 切除术中进行广泛淋巴结检查的实用性和成本效益:对2011年至2018年的354例病例进行回顾性分析。排除了疑似恶性肿瘤或大体提示癌变的病灶切除术。收集了患者数据、切除类型、淋巴结计数和随访信息:结果显示,51%(180 例)的病例检查出 12 个或更多淋巴结。只有 1 个病例(0.3%)在检查的 26 个淋巴结中发现了伴有狭窄的微小浸润癌,但没有转移。在 4972 个接受评估的淋巴结中未发现转移性疾病。估计总共节省了至少 19 812 美元,显微镜评估节省了约 10.4 分钟。在平均 5.7 年的随访期间,没有患者出现肠道原发肿瘤的转移性疾病。在 20 名死亡患者中,有 14 名患者(70%)有死亡原因,其中 11 人(55%)死于非肿瘤性原因,3 人(15%)死于非肠道恶性肿瘤:结论:虽然淋巴结评估对IBD相关性结直肠癌至关重要,但如果没有临床或大体病理怀疑,就没有必要进行结直肠癌方案类型的淋巴结搜索。保守的淋巴结取样方法可在不影响患者治疗的前提下优化资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analytical and Clinical Validation of the Oncomine Dx Target Test to Assess HER2 Mutation Status in Tumor Tissue Samples From Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in the DESTINY-Lung01 and DESTINY-Lung02 Studies. Ethical and Regulatory Perspectives on Generative Artificial Intelligence in Pathology. Reduced Plasma Selenoprotein P Is Associated With Type I Antithrombin Deficiency and a Prothrombotic State. The Anatomic Pathology Hospitalist Model. Histologic Features of Liver Injury Associated With SARS-CoV-2 Messenger RNA Vaccines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1