Application of the modified Byars staged procedure for severe hypospadias repair.

Qi-Gen Xie, Ting-Ting Xue, Xu-Ren Chen, Zhao-Ying Li, Zhe Xu, Zuo-Qing Li, Peng Luo
{"title":"Application of the modified Byars staged procedure for severe hypospadias repair.","authors":"Qi-Gen Xie, Ting-Ting Xue, Xu-Ren Chen, Zhao-Ying Li, Zhe Xu, Zuo-Qing Li, Peng Luo","doi":"10.4103/aja202470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to introduce a modified Byars staged procedure and investigate its application value in patients with severe hypospadias. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients with severe hypospadias admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (Guangzhou, China) between October 2012 and October 2022. In total, 31 patients underwent the conventional Byars procedure (conventional group), and 45 patients underwent the modified Byars staged procedure (modified group). Our modified strategy was built upon the standard Byars procedure by incorporating glansplasty during the first stage and employing a Y-shaped flap in conjunction with a glandular tunnel for urethroplasty during the second stage. Notably, there were no statistically significant differences in the preoperative baseline characteristics, duration of surgery, amount of blood loss, or occurrence of postoperative complications, including urethral fistula, stricture and diverticulum, or penile curvature, between the conventional and modified groups. However, there was a significantly lower incidence of coronal sulcus fistula (0 vs 16.1%, P = 0.02) and glans dehiscence (0 vs 12.9%, P = 0.02) in the surgical group than that in the conventional group. In addition, the modified group exhibited a notably greater rate of normotopic urethral opening (100.0% vs 83.9%, P = 0.01) and a higher mean score on the Hypospadias Objective Penile Evaluation (HOPE; mean ± standard error of mean: 8.6 ± 0.2 vs 7.9 ± 0.3, P = 0.02) than did the conventional group. In conclusion, the modified Byars staged procedure significantly reduced the risks of glans dehiscence and coronal sulcus fistula. Consequently, it offers a promising approach for achieving favorable penile esthetics, thereby providing a reliable therapeutic option for severe hypospadias.</p>","PeriodicalId":93889,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of andrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of andrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aja202470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to introduce a modified Byars staged procedure and investigate its application value in patients with severe hypospadias. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients with severe hypospadias admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (Guangzhou, China) between October 2012 and October 2022. In total, 31 patients underwent the conventional Byars procedure (conventional group), and 45 patients underwent the modified Byars staged procedure (modified group). Our modified strategy was built upon the standard Byars procedure by incorporating glansplasty during the first stage and employing a Y-shaped flap in conjunction with a glandular tunnel for urethroplasty during the second stage. Notably, there were no statistically significant differences in the preoperative baseline characteristics, duration of surgery, amount of blood loss, or occurrence of postoperative complications, including urethral fistula, stricture and diverticulum, or penile curvature, between the conventional and modified groups. However, there was a significantly lower incidence of coronal sulcus fistula (0 vs 16.1%, P = 0.02) and glans dehiscence (0 vs 12.9%, P = 0.02) in the surgical group than that in the conventional group. In addition, the modified group exhibited a notably greater rate of normotopic urethral opening (100.0% vs 83.9%, P = 0.01) and a higher mean score on the Hypospadias Objective Penile Evaluation (HOPE; mean ± standard error of mean: 8.6 ± 0.2 vs 7.9 ± 0.3, P = 0.02) than did the conventional group. In conclusion, the modified Byars staged procedure significantly reduced the risks of glans dehiscence and coronal sulcus fistula. Consequently, it offers a promising approach for achieving favorable penile esthetics, thereby providing a reliable therapeutic option for severe hypospadias.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用改良拜尔斯分期手术进行重度尿道下裂修补术。
本研究旨在介绍改良Byars分期手术,并探讨其在重度尿道下裂患者中的应用价值。我们回顾性分析了2012年10月至2022年10月期间中山大学附属第一医院(中国广州)收治的重度尿道下裂患者的临床资料。共有31名患者接受了传统的Byars手术(传统组),45名患者接受了改良的Byars分期手术(改良组)。我们的改良策略以标准拜尔斯手术为基础,在第一阶段采用龟头成形术,在第二阶段采用 Y 形皮瓣结合腺体隧道进行尿道成形术。值得注意的是,传统组和改良组在术前基线特征、手术时间、失血量或术后并发症(包括尿道瘘、狭窄和憩室或阴茎弯曲)的发生率方面均无统计学差异。不过,手术组冠状沟瘘(0 vs 16.1%,P = 0.02)和龟头开裂(0 vs 12.9%,P = 0.02)的发生率明显低于传统组。此外,改良组的尿道正常开放率(100.0% vs 83.9%,P = 0.01)明显高于传统组,尿道下裂客观阴茎评估(HOPE;平均值±平均值标准误差:8.6 ± 0.2 vs 7.9 ± 0.3,P = 0.02)的平均得分也高于传统组。总之,改良 Byars 分期手术大大降低了龟头开裂和冠状沟瘘的风险。因此,它为获得良好的阴茎美学效果提供了一种可行的方法,从而为严重尿道下裂提供了一种可靠的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Androgen receptor inhibitors in treating prostate cancer. Genitourethral foreign bodies: 20-year experience and outcomes from a single center. Associations of Ureaplasma urealyticum infection with male infertility and intrauterine insemination outcomes. PSMA PET/CT in the low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer: when and why? High-intensity focused ultrasound strategies for treating prostate cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1