Validation of the basic need satisfaction for sport scale in Ethiopian athletes.

IF 2.3 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Frontiers in Sports and Active Living Pub Date : 2024-08-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fspor.2024.1424151
Getabirhan Getinet Melesse, Zelalem Melkamu Tegegne, Sangeeta Rani
{"title":"Validation of the basic need satisfaction for sport scale in Ethiopian athletes.","authors":"Getabirhan Getinet Melesse, Zelalem Melkamu Tegegne, Sangeeta Rani","doi":"10.3389/fspor.2024.1424151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>By anchoring on the self-determination theory in an Ethiopian context, this study tried to establish the basic need satisfaction sport scales (BNSSS) reliability and validity. Despite the scale's usefulness in measuring athletes' psychological need fulfillment during a sporting event, no study has proven the scale's validity in a setting of Ethiopian sports. To validate the BNSSS scale, confirmatory factor analysis was used in the study. The 20 items of the BNSSS questionnaire's English translation are divided into five categories: relatedness, competence, autonomy-perceived locus of internal causality, autonomy-choice, and volition. Senior language experts translated the BNSSS questionnaire into Amharic. The Amharic version of the instrument was used to gather data from 321 athletes, 174 men, and 147 women, with a mean age of 23.34 22.59 and a standard deviation of 5.08 and mean age 5.32; a standard deviation of 2.33 year of experience in their sports from four baseball games. With a Cronbach's alpha value ranging from 0.848 to 0.882 (IPLOC to Volition respectively) across the five subscales and, the results confirm the reliability of the BNSSS for evaluating satisfaction with basic needs and motivation among Ethiopian athletes.\" The result demonstrated an acceptable fit with the data (CFI, = 0.958, GFI, = 0.933, RMR, = 0.76, RMSEA, = 0.39) as well as internal consistency. All of the components' Cronbach's alpha values met expectations. The instrument's Amharic translation was thus valid and reliable for determining the extent to which Ethiopian athletes' basic needs were met.</p>","PeriodicalId":12716,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11374615/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1424151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

By anchoring on the self-determination theory in an Ethiopian context, this study tried to establish the basic need satisfaction sport scales (BNSSS) reliability and validity. Despite the scale's usefulness in measuring athletes' psychological need fulfillment during a sporting event, no study has proven the scale's validity in a setting of Ethiopian sports. To validate the BNSSS scale, confirmatory factor analysis was used in the study. The 20 items of the BNSSS questionnaire's English translation are divided into five categories: relatedness, competence, autonomy-perceived locus of internal causality, autonomy-choice, and volition. Senior language experts translated the BNSSS questionnaire into Amharic. The Amharic version of the instrument was used to gather data from 321 athletes, 174 men, and 147 women, with a mean age of 23.34 22.59 and a standard deviation of 5.08 and mean age 5.32; a standard deviation of 2.33 year of experience in their sports from four baseball games. With a Cronbach's alpha value ranging from 0.848 to 0.882 (IPLOC to Volition respectively) across the five subscales and, the results confirm the reliability of the BNSSS for evaluating satisfaction with basic needs and motivation among Ethiopian athletes." The result demonstrated an acceptable fit with the data (CFI, = 0.958, GFI, = 0.933, RMR, = 0.76, RMSEA, = 0.39) as well as internal consistency. All of the components' Cronbach's alpha values met expectations. The instrument's Amharic translation was thus valid and reliable for determining the extent to which Ethiopian athletes' basic needs were met.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在埃塞俄比亚运动员中验证体育运动基本需求满意度量表。
本研究以埃塞俄比亚的自我决定理论为基础,试图确定体育运动基本需求满足量表 (BNSSS)的信度和效度。尽管该量表可用于测量运动员在体育比赛中的心理需求满足情况,但还没有研究证明该量表在埃塞俄比亚体育环境中的有效性。为了验证 BNSSS 量表,本研究采用了确认性因子分析。BNSSS 问卷的英文翻译共 20 个条目,分为五个类别:相关性、能力、自主--感知内因位置、自主--选择和意志。资深语言专家将 BNSSS 问卷翻译成了阿姆哈拉语。使用阿姆哈拉语版本的问卷收集了 321 名运动员的数据,其中男性 174 人,女性 147 人,平均年龄为 23.34 22.59 岁,标准差为 5.08 岁;平均年龄为 5.32 岁;标准差为 2.33 岁,有四次棒球比赛的运动经验。五个分量表的 Cronbach's alpha 值从 0.848 到 0.882(IPLOC 和 Volition 分别为 0.848 和 0.882),结果证实了 BNSSS 在评估埃塞俄比亚运动员基本需求和动机满意度方面的可靠性"。结果表明,该问卷与数据的拟合度(CFI=0.958,GFI=0.933,RMR=0.76,RMSEA=0.39)以及内部一致性均可接受。所有组成部分的 Cronbach's alpha 值均符合预期。因此,该工具的阿姆哈拉语译本在确定埃塞俄比亚运动员的基本需求得到满足的程度方面是有效和可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
459
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Inter-individual differences in muscle damage following a single bout of high-intense whole-body electromyostimulation. Habitual water intake impacted the body composition of young male athletes in free-living conditions: a cross-sectional study. The relationship between maximal lactate accumulation rate and sprint performance parameters in male competitive swimmers. Coach perspectives on coach-athlete relationships and characteristics of Generation Z academy level rugby union players from South Africa. Digital fist bumps: searching for datafication and digitalisation in everyday CrossFit coaching practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1