Virtual Collaborative Care Versus Specialty Psychiatry Treatment for Depression or Anxiety.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Clinical Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.4088/JCP.24m15332
Kathryn K Ridout, Mubarika Alavi, Catherine Lee, Lisa Fazzolari, Samuel J Ridout, Maria T Koshy, Brooke Harris, Sameer Awsare, Constance M Weisner, Esti Iturralde
{"title":"Virtual Collaborative Care Versus Specialty Psychiatry Treatment for Depression or Anxiety.","authors":"Kathryn K Ridout, Mubarika Alavi, Catherine Lee, Lisa Fazzolari, Samuel J Ridout, Maria T Koshy, Brooke Harris, Sameer Awsare, Constance M Weisner, Esti Iturralde","doi":"10.4088/JCP.24m15332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> While collaborative care is known to improve depressive and anxiety symptoms in primary care, comparative effectiveness studies of virtual collaborative care versus virtual specialty psychiatry treatment in real world settings are lacking. This study examined patient depressive and anxiety symptoms over 6 months in collaborative care versus specialty psychiatry.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> This was an observational study with target trial emulation in a large, community-based, integrated health care system. Participants were ≥18 years old with mild-moderate depressive or anxiety symptoms measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 or Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Scale. Exclusion criteria included acute suicide risk. Patients were assigned to collaborative care or specialty psychiatry, and symptoms were measured 6 months after treatment initiation using linear mixed-effects regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> There were N = 10,380 patients (n = 1,607 in collaborative care; n = 8,773 in specialty psychiatry) with depressive disorders and N = 2,935 (n = 570 in collaborative care; n = 2,365 in specialty psychiatry) with anxiety disorders. Model effects at 6 months showed significant symptom improvement for patients in collaborative care (adjusted mean difference [AMD] = -9.0, 95% CI, -9.7, -8.4 for depression; -5.4, 95% CI, -6.2, -4.7 for anxiety) and in specialty psychiatry (AMD = -5.0, 95% CI, -5.6, -4.5 for depression; -2.8, 95% CI, -3.6, -2.1 for anxiety), with patients in collaborative care showing significantly greater improvement compared to those in specialty psychiatry (AMD = -4.0, 95% CI, -4.7, -3.3, <i>P</i> < .0001 for depression; AMD = -2.6, 95% CI, -3.4, -1.8, <i>P</i> < .0001 for anxiety).</p><p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Virtual collaborative care was at least as effective as specialty psychiatry for depression and anxiety. Collaborative care implementation can support national guidelines regarding depression and anxiety screening and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"85 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.24m15332","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: While collaborative care is known to improve depressive and anxiety symptoms in primary care, comparative effectiveness studies of virtual collaborative care versus virtual specialty psychiatry treatment in real world settings are lacking. This study examined patient depressive and anxiety symptoms over 6 months in collaborative care versus specialty psychiatry.

Methods: This was an observational study with target trial emulation in a large, community-based, integrated health care system. Participants were ≥18 years old with mild-moderate depressive or anxiety symptoms measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 or Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Scale. Exclusion criteria included acute suicide risk. Patients were assigned to collaborative care or specialty psychiatry, and symptoms were measured 6 months after treatment initiation using linear mixed-effects regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting.

Results: There were N = 10,380 patients (n = 1,607 in collaborative care; n = 8,773 in specialty psychiatry) with depressive disorders and N = 2,935 (n = 570 in collaborative care; n = 2,365 in specialty psychiatry) with anxiety disorders. Model effects at 6 months showed significant symptom improvement for patients in collaborative care (adjusted mean difference [AMD] = -9.0, 95% CI, -9.7, -8.4 for depression; -5.4, 95% CI, -6.2, -4.7 for anxiety) and in specialty psychiatry (AMD = -5.0, 95% CI, -5.6, -4.5 for depression; -2.8, 95% CI, -3.6, -2.1 for anxiety), with patients in collaborative care showing significantly greater improvement compared to those in specialty psychiatry (AMD = -4.0, 95% CI, -4.7, -3.3, P < .0001 for depression; AMD = -2.6, 95% CI, -3.4, -1.8, P < .0001 for anxiety).

Conclusions: Virtual collaborative care was at least as effective as specialty psychiatry for depression and anxiety. Collaborative care implementation can support national guidelines regarding depression and anxiety screening and treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚拟协作护理与抑郁症或焦虑症专科精神病学治疗的比较。
目的:众所周知,协作护理可改善初级护理中的抑郁和焦虑症状,但在现实环境中,却缺乏虚拟协作护理与虚拟专科精神病治疗的有效性比较研究。本研究考察了协作护理与专科精神病治疗 6 个月内患者的抑郁和焦虑症状:这是一项观察性研究,在一个大型社区综合医疗保健系统中进行目标试验模拟。研究对象年龄≥18岁,有轻度-中度抑郁或焦虑症状,以患者健康问卷-9或广泛性焦虑症-7量表进行测量。排除标准包括急性自杀风险。患者被分配到协作治疗或专科精神病学治疗,并在开始治疗 6 个月后使用线性混合效应回归法对症状进行测量,同时使用治疗的逆概率加权法:共有10,380名患者患有抑郁症(合作治疗的患者人数为1,607人;专科精神病治疗的患者人数为8,773人),2,935名患者患有焦虑症(合作治疗的患者人数为570人;专科精神病治疗的患者人数为2,365人)。6 个月时的模型效应显示,合作护理患者的症状有明显改善(调整后平均差 [AMD] = -9.0,95% CI,-9.7,-8.4(抑郁);-5.4,95% CI,-6.2,-4.7(焦虑)),而专科精神病学患者的症状有明显改善(AMD = -5.0,95% CI,-5.6,-4.5(抑郁);-2.8,95% CI,-3.6,-2.1(焦虑),与专科精神科患者相比,合作护理患者的改善程度明显更大(AMD = -4.0,95% CI,-4.7,-3.3,P < .0001(抑郁);AMD = -2.6,95% CI,-3.4,-1.8,P < .0001(焦虑)):结论:在抑郁和焦虑方面,虚拟协作护理至少与专科精神病治疗一样有效。协作护理的实施可支持有关抑郁和焦虑症筛查与治疗的国家指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: For over 75 years, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry has been a leading source of peer-reviewed articles offering the latest information on mental health topics to psychiatrists and other medical professionals.The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry is the leading psychiatric resource for clinical information and covers disorders including depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety, addiction, posttraumatic stress disorder, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder while exploring the newest advances in diagnosis and treatment.
期刊最新文献
Dysregulation of Noradrenergic Activity: Its Role in Conceptualizing and Treating Major Depressive Disorder, Schizophrenia, Agitation in Alzheimer's Disease, and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. Mixed Features and Nonfatal Suicide Attempt Among Individuals With Major Depressive Episode: Insights From the French MHGP Survey. History of Concussion and Risk of Severe Maternal Mental Illness: A Population-Based Cohort Study. Maternal Cannabis Use During Pregnancy and Maternal and Neonatal Adverse Outcomes. Opioid Use Disorder Treatment in Sexually and Gender Diverse Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1