Efficacy of exercise interventions on prevention of sport-related concussion and related outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 11.6 1区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES British Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1136/bjsports-2024-108260
Branimir Ivanic, Anna Cronström, Kajsa Johansson, Eva Ageberg
{"title":"Efficacy of exercise interventions on prevention of sport-related concussion and related outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Branimir Ivanic, Anna Cronström, Kajsa Johansson, Eva Ageberg","doi":"10.1136/bjsports-2024-108260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To review the efficacy of exercise interventions on sport-related concussion (SRC) incidence, as well as on linear and rotational head accelerations, and isometric neck strength and to assess reporting completeness of exercise interventions using the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT). Design Systematic review and meta-analysis, according to the Prisma in Exercise, Rehabilitation, Sport medicine and SporTs science guidelines. Data sources Six databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science CC and SPORTDiscus) were searched up to 26 June 2023. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cluster RCTs or quasi-experimental studies, evaluating exercise interventions on SRC incidence, linear and rotational head accelerations, and/or isometric neck strength in male and/or female athletes of any age, and/or in a healthy general population. Results A total of 26 articles were included. A large effect size was observed for resistance training (RT) on isometric neck strength (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.85; 95% CI 0.57 to 1.13; high-quality evidence). Non-significant effect sizes were observed for neuromuscular warm-up programmes on SRC incidence (risk ratio 0.69; 95% CI 0.39 to 1.23; low-quality evidence), or for RT on linear head acceleration (SMD −0.43; 95% CI −1.26 to 0.40; very low-quality evidence) or rotational head acceleration (SMD 0.08; 95% CI −0.61 to 0.77; low-quality evidence). No studies assessed the impact of RT on SRC incidence. CERT scores ranged from 4 to 16 (out of 19) with median score of 11.5 (IQR 9–13). Conclusion RT increases isometric neck strength, but the effect on SRC incidence is unknown. More adequately powered and rigorous trials are needed to evaluate the effect of exercise interventions on SRC incidence, and on linear and rotational head accelerations. Future studies should follow CERT guidelines, as the included interventions were generally not reported in sufficient detail for accurate replication. PROSPERO registration number CRD42023435033. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as online supplemental information. Not applicable.","PeriodicalId":9276,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2024-108260","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To review the efficacy of exercise interventions on sport-related concussion (SRC) incidence, as well as on linear and rotational head accelerations, and isometric neck strength and to assess reporting completeness of exercise interventions using the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT). Design Systematic review and meta-analysis, according to the Prisma in Exercise, Rehabilitation, Sport medicine and SporTs science guidelines. Data sources Six databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science CC and SPORTDiscus) were searched up to 26 June 2023. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cluster RCTs or quasi-experimental studies, evaluating exercise interventions on SRC incidence, linear and rotational head accelerations, and/or isometric neck strength in male and/or female athletes of any age, and/or in a healthy general population. Results A total of 26 articles were included. A large effect size was observed for resistance training (RT) on isometric neck strength (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.85; 95% CI 0.57 to 1.13; high-quality evidence). Non-significant effect sizes were observed for neuromuscular warm-up programmes on SRC incidence (risk ratio 0.69; 95% CI 0.39 to 1.23; low-quality evidence), or for RT on linear head acceleration (SMD −0.43; 95% CI −1.26 to 0.40; very low-quality evidence) or rotational head acceleration (SMD 0.08; 95% CI −0.61 to 0.77; low-quality evidence). No studies assessed the impact of RT on SRC incidence. CERT scores ranged from 4 to 16 (out of 19) with median score of 11.5 (IQR 9–13). Conclusion RT increases isometric neck strength, but the effect on SRC incidence is unknown. More adequately powered and rigorous trials are needed to evaluate the effect of exercise interventions on SRC incidence, and on linear and rotational head accelerations. Future studies should follow CERT guidelines, as the included interventions were generally not reported in sufficient detail for accurate replication. PROSPERO registration number CRD42023435033. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as online supplemental information. Not applicable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运动干预对预防运动相关脑震荡及相关结果的功效:系统回顾与荟萃分析
目的 回顾运动干预对运动相关脑震荡(SRC)发病率、头部线性加速度和旋转加速度以及颈部等长力量的疗效,并使用运动报告模板共识(CERT)评估运动干预报告的完整性。设计 根据《运动、康复、运动医学 Prisma》和《SporTs 科学指南》进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。数据来源 搜索了截至 2023 年 6 月 26 日的六个数据库(MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、Scopus、Web of Science CC 和 SPORTDiscus)。选择研究的资格标准 随机对照试验(RCT)、分组 RCT 或准实验研究,评估运动干预对任何年龄的男性和/或女性运动员和/或健康普通人群的 SRC 发生率、头部线性和旋转加速度和/或颈部等长力量的影响。结果 共纳入 26 篇文章。结果显示,阻力训练(RT)对颈部等长力量的影响较大(标准化平均差(SMD)为 0.85;95% CI 为 0.57 至 1.13;高质量证据)。神经肌肉热身计划对SRC发生率(风险比为0.69;95% CI为0.39至1.23;低质量证据)或阻力训练对头部线性加速度(SMD为-0.43;95% CI为-1.26至0.40;极低质量证据)或头部旋转加速度(SMD为0.08;95% CI为-0.61至0.77;低质量证据)的影响大小不显著。没有研究评估了RT对SRC发生率的影响。CERT 评分从 4 分到 16 分不等(共 19 分),中位数为 11.5 分(IQR 9-13)。结论 RT 可以增强颈部等长肌力,但对 SRC 发生率的影响尚不清楚。需要进行更多动力充足的严格试验,以评估运动干预对 SRC 发生率以及头部线性加速度和旋转加速度的影响。未来的研究应遵循CERT指南,因为纳入的干预措施通常没有足够详细的报告,无法准确复制。PROSPERO 注册号为 CRD42023435033。与研究相关的所有数据均包含在文章中或作为在线补充信息上传。不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
217
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Sports Medicine (BJSM) is a dynamic platform that presents groundbreaking research, thought-provoking reviews, and meaningful discussions on sport and exercise medicine. Our focus encompasses various clinically-relevant aspects such as physiotherapy, physical therapy, and rehabilitation. With an aim to foster innovation, education, and knowledge translation, we strive to bridge the gap between research and practical implementation in the field. Our multi-media approach, including web, print, video, and audio resources, along with our active presence on social media, connects a global community of healthcare professionals dedicated to treating active individuals.
期刊最新文献
Impact of postpartum physical activity on maternal depression and anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Association of self-reported health problems and interpersonal violence in sport: a cross-sectional study in world-level performing athletes. Colliding skilfully: preparing female athletes for collision events. Infographic. Multiligament knee injury (MLKI): an expert consensus statement on nomenclature, diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation. Standardising health history and injury surveillance of participants in endurance events: a modified Delphi consensus statement from the AMSSM runner health consortium
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1