Multi-institutional study examining intraoperative entrustment and resident sex

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY American journal of surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115925
Samantha Baker , Julie Evans , Niki Matusko , Brenessa Lindeman , Sarah Jung , Sebin Choi , Rebecca Minter , Mackenzie Cook , Karen Brasel , Gurjit Sandhu
{"title":"Multi-institutional study examining intraoperative entrustment and resident sex","authors":"Samantha Baker ,&nbsp;Julie Evans ,&nbsp;Niki Matusko ,&nbsp;Brenessa Lindeman ,&nbsp;Sarah Jung ,&nbsp;Sebin Choi ,&nbsp;Rebecca Minter ,&nbsp;Mackenzie Cook ,&nbsp;Karen Brasel ,&nbsp;Gurjit Sandhu","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Single-site studies have found variable associations between gender and entrustment-based interactions during surgical residency. We sought to assess the relationship between resident sex and intraoperative entrustment at multiple institutions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Surgical cases were observed at four university-based training programs. Faculty entrustment and resident entrustability were rated using OpTrust. OpTrust is a validated intraoperative entrustment measurement tool which enables trained third-party raters to objectively score resident and faculty behaviors in the operating room. Independent sample t-tests and regression analysis with cluster adjusted standard errors were used.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>337 cases were observed which included 149 residents (54 ​% female) and 97 faculty members (30 ​% female). There was no difference in resident entrustability based on resident sex (p ​= ​0.30). Female residents were more likely to be involved in cases rated as more difficult (p ​= ​0.04). At a single site, male residents scored higher on resident entrustability (p ​= ​0.007) and faculty entrustment (p ​= ​0.022).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Entrustment did not differ based on resident sex on a multi-institutional scale; however, at a single site, there was a difference; suggesting there are multi-factorial issues contributing to differences in training.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"240 ","pages":"Article 115925"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000296102400477X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Single-site studies have found variable associations between gender and entrustment-based interactions during surgical residency. We sought to assess the relationship between resident sex and intraoperative entrustment at multiple institutions.

Methods

Surgical cases were observed at four university-based training programs. Faculty entrustment and resident entrustability were rated using OpTrust. OpTrust is a validated intraoperative entrustment measurement tool which enables trained third-party raters to objectively score resident and faculty behaviors in the operating room. Independent sample t-tests and regression analysis with cluster adjusted standard errors were used.

Results

337 cases were observed which included 149 residents (54 ​% female) and 97 faculty members (30 ​% female). There was no difference in resident entrustability based on resident sex (p ​= ​0.30). Female residents were more likely to be involved in cases rated as more difficult (p ​= ​0.04). At a single site, male residents scored higher on resident entrustability (p ​= ​0.007) and faculty entrustment (p ​= ​0.022).

Conclusion

Entrustment did not differ based on resident sex on a multi-institutional scale; however, at a single site, there was a difference; suggesting there are multi-factorial issues contributing to differences in training.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对术中委托和住院医生性别进行的多机构研究。
导言:单点研究发现,在外科住院医师培训期间,性别与基于委托的互动之间存在不同的关联。我们试图评估多个机构的住院医师性别与术中委托之间的关系:方法:我们在四所大学的培训项目中对手术病例进行了观察。使用 OpTrust 对教员委托和住院医师可委托性进行评分。OpTrust是一种经过验证的术中委托测量工具,经过培训的第三方评分员可以对住院医师和教师在手术室的行为进行客观评分。研究采用了独立样本 t 检验和带有群组调整标准误差的回归分析:共观察了 337 个病例,其中包括 149 名住院医师(54% 为女性)和 97 名教员(30% 为女性)。住院医师的可委托性与住院医师的性别没有差异(p = 0.30)。女性住院医师更有可能参与难度较高的病例(p = 0.04)。在单个地点,男性住院医师在住院医师可托度(p = 0.007)和教师可托度(p = 0.022)方面得分更高:结论:在多机构调查中,不同性别的住院医师在可委托性方面并无差异;但在单个机构中,却存在差异;这表明造成培训差异的因素是多方面的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Trends in use of outpatient minimally-invasive adrenalectomy: A population-based analysis Colorectal cancer care equity in underserved communities: Innovative solutions for screening, outreach & capacity in rural Washington “Sucking the trouble” out of troubleshooting wound vacs: Video based curriculum development and implementation in a live tissue model Continuous intraoperative AI monitoring of surgical technical skills using computer vision. Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1