Predominant approaches to measuring pregnancy-related anxiety in Sub-saharan Africa: a scoping review.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH BMC Public Health Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1186/s12889-024-19935-3
Sophia Dane Fraga, Ibrahim Nawaz Khan, Tanvi A Sharma, Emma R Lawrence
{"title":"Predominant approaches to measuring pregnancy-related anxiety in Sub-saharan Africa: a scoping review.","authors":"Sophia Dane Fraga, Ibrahim Nawaz Khan, Tanvi A Sharma, Emma R Lawrence","doi":"10.1186/s12889-024-19935-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pregnancy-related anxiety significantly impacts maternal and fetal health in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including those within Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Most studies conducted to evaluate pregnancy-related anxiety in LMICs have utilized scales developed in high-income countries, despite significant variations in pregnancy-related anxiety due to socioeconomic and cultural contexts. This review surveyed existing literature in order to identify which scales have been used to measure pregnancy-related anxiety in SSA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Health and Psychosocial Instruments, and APA PsycNet for relevant studies published in the English language up to March 22, 2023. Eligible studies focused on anxiety in pregnant populations within SSA, using validated scales or tools. Screening followed PRIMSA guidelines, with blinded review at the abstract/title level and subsequent full-text review. Data was extracted and analyzed to identify trends and characteristics of the screening tools used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 271 articles, 37 met inclusion criteria, identifying 24 different tools used to measure anxiety in pregnant women in SSA. The most common tools were the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (seven uses), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (five uses), and the Self-Reporting Questionnaire 20 (five uses). Seven tools were pregnancy-specific, with only two designed specifically for SSA: the Risk Factor Assessment (RFA), and the 4-Item Screening Tool. Studies were most frequently conducted in South Africa, followed by Tanzania, Ethiopia, Nigeria, and Ghana.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This scoping review illustrates that only two tools (the RFA and 4-item Screening Tool) were created to assess pregnancy-related anxiety specifically in SSA. This highlights the need for more culturally sensitive tools tailored to the specific contexts of pregnant populations in SSA.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11378414/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19935-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pregnancy-related anxiety significantly impacts maternal and fetal health in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including those within Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Most studies conducted to evaluate pregnancy-related anxiety in LMICs have utilized scales developed in high-income countries, despite significant variations in pregnancy-related anxiety due to socioeconomic and cultural contexts. This review surveyed existing literature in order to identify which scales have been used to measure pregnancy-related anxiety in SSA.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Health and Psychosocial Instruments, and APA PsycNet for relevant studies published in the English language up to March 22, 2023. Eligible studies focused on anxiety in pregnant populations within SSA, using validated scales or tools. Screening followed PRIMSA guidelines, with blinded review at the abstract/title level and subsequent full-text review. Data was extracted and analyzed to identify trends and characteristics of the screening tools used.

Results: From 271 articles, 37 met inclusion criteria, identifying 24 different tools used to measure anxiety in pregnant women in SSA. The most common tools were the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (seven uses), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (five uses), and the Self-Reporting Questionnaire 20 (five uses). Seven tools were pregnancy-specific, with only two designed specifically for SSA: the Risk Factor Assessment (RFA), and the 4-Item Screening Tool. Studies were most frequently conducted in South Africa, followed by Tanzania, Ethiopia, Nigeria, and Ghana.

Conclusions: This scoping review illustrates that only two tools (the RFA and 4-item Screening Tool) were created to assess pregnancy-related anxiety specifically in SSA. This highlights the need for more culturally sensitive tools tailored to the specific contexts of pregnant populations in SSA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
衡量撒哈拉以南非洲地区与妊娠有关的焦虑的主要方法:范围审查。
背景:在中低收入国家(LMIC),包括撒哈拉以南非洲国家(SSA),与妊娠有关的焦虑严重影响着孕产妇和胎儿的健康。尽管与妊娠有关的焦虑因社会经济和文化背景的不同而存在很大差异,但大多数针对低收入和中等收入国家与妊娠有关的焦虑进行评估的研究都采用了高收入国家开发的量表。本综述对现有文献进行了调查,以确定哪些量表被用于测量 SSA 国家与妊娠有关的焦虑:在 PubMed、Health and Psychosocial Instruments 和 APA PsycNet 上对截至 2023 年 3 月 22 日以英语发表的相关研究进行了系统检索。符合条件的研究均采用经过验证的量表或工具,关注 SSA 地区怀孕人群的焦虑问题。筛选遵循 PRIMSA 指南,在摘要/标题层面进行盲审,随后进行全文审阅。对数据进行提取和分析,以确定所用筛查工具的趋势和特点:在 271 篇文章中,有 37 篇符合纳入标准,确定了 24 种用于测量 SSA 孕妇焦虑症的不同工具。最常见的工具是广泛性焦虑症 7 项量表(7 次使用)、状态-特质焦虑量表(5 次使用)和 20 分自我报告问卷(5 次使用)。有七种工具是针对妊娠的,只有两种是专门为撒南非洲设计的:风险因素评估(RFA)和四项目筛查工具。开展研究最多的国家是南非,其次是坦桑尼亚、埃塞俄比亚、尼日利亚和加纳:本次范围界定审查表明,只有两种工具(RFA 和 4 项筛选工具)是专门针对撒南非洲的妊娠焦虑症评估而设计的。这突出表明,有必要针对撒南非洲怀孕人群的具体情况开发更多具有文化敏感性的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
期刊最新文献
Association between total body muscle-fat ratio and risk of thyroid disorders: a cross-sectional study The association between mental status, personality traits, and discrepancy in social isolation and perceived loneliness among community dwellers Prevalence of undiagnosed hypertension and associated factors in Ndera sector, Gasabo district of Rwanda: a cross-sectional study Housing instability patterns among low-income, urban Black young adults in California and associations with mental health outcomes: baseline data from a randomized waitlist-controlled trial Level of hesitation of parents about childhood vaccines and affecting factors: a cross-sectional study in Turkey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1