Not all healthcare inequities in diabetes are equal: a comparison of two medically underserved cohorts.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004229
Ashby F Walker, Michael J Haller, Ananta Addala, Stephanie L Filipp, Rayhan Lal, Matthew J Gurka, Lauren E Figg, Melanie Hechavarria, Dessi P Zaharieva, Keilecia G Malden, Korey K Hood, Sarah C Westen, Jessie J Wong, William T Donahoo, Marina Basina, Angelina V Bernier, Paul Duncan, David M Maahs
{"title":"Not all healthcare inequities in diabetes are equal: a comparison of two medically underserved cohorts.","authors":"Ashby F Walker, Michael J Haller, Ananta Addala, Stephanie L Filipp, Rayhan Lal, Matthew J Gurka, Lauren E Figg, Melanie Hechavarria, Dessi P Zaharieva, Keilecia G Malden, Korey K Hood, Sarah C Westen, Jessie J Wong, William T Donahoo, Marina Basina, Angelina V Bernier, Paul Duncan, David M Maahs","doi":"10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diabetes disparities exist based on socioeconomic status, race, and ethnicity. The aim of this study is to compare two cohorts with diabetes from California and Florida to better elucidate how health outcomes are stratified within underserved communities according to state location, race, and ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Two cohorts were recruited for comparison from 20 Federally Qualified Health Centers as part of a larger ECHO Diabetes program. Participant-level data included surveys and HbA1c collection. Center-level data included Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set metrics. Demographic characteristics were summarized overall and stratified by state (frequencies, percentages, means (95% CIs)). Generalized linear mixed models were used to compute and compare model-estimated rates and means.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participant-level cohort: 582 adults with diabetes were recruited (33.0% type 1 diabetes (T1D), 67.0% type 2 diabetes (T2D)). Mean age was 51.1 years (95% CI 49.5, 52.6); 80.7% publicly insured or uninsured; 43.7% non-Hispanic white (NHW), 31.6% Hispanic, 7.9% non-Hispanic black (NHB) and 16.8% other. Center-level cohort: 32 796 adults with diabetes were represented (3.4% with T1D, 96.6% with T2D; 72.7% publicly insured or uninsured). Florida had higher rates of uninsured (p<0.0001), lower continuous glucose monitor (CGM) use (18.3% Florida; 35.9% California, p<0.0001), and pump use (10.2% Florida; 26.5% California, p<0.0001), and higher proportions of people with T1D/T2D>9% HbA1c (p<0.001). Risk was stratified within states with NHB participants having higher HbA1c (mean 9.5 (95% CI 8.9, 10.0) compared with NHW with a mean of 8.4 (95% CI 7.8, 9.0), p=0.0058), lower pump use (p=0.0426) and CGM use (p=0.0192). People who prefer to speak English were more likely to use a CGM (p=0.0386).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Characteristics of medically underserved communities with diabetes vary by state and by race and ethnicity. Florida's lack of Medicaid expansion could be a factor in worsened risks for vulnerable communities with diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9151,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care","volume":"12 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11381725/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004229","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Diabetes disparities exist based on socioeconomic status, race, and ethnicity. The aim of this study is to compare two cohorts with diabetes from California and Florida to better elucidate how health outcomes are stratified within underserved communities according to state location, race, and ethnicity.

Research design and methods: Two cohorts were recruited for comparison from 20 Federally Qualified Health Centers as part of a larger ECHO Diabetes program. Participant-level data included surveys and HbA1c collection. Center-level data included Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set metrics. Demographic characteristics were summarized overall and stratified by state (frequencies, percentages, means (95% CIs)). Generalized linear mixed models were used to compute and compare model-estimated rates and means.

Results: Participant-level cohort: 582 adults with diabetes were recruited (33.0% type 1 diabetes (T1D), 67.0% type 2 diabetes (T2D)). Mean age was 51.1 years (95% CI 49.5, 52.6); 80.7% publicly insured or uninsured; 43.7% non-Hispanic white (NHW), 31.6% Hispanic, 7.9% non-Hispanic black (NHB) and 16.8% other. Center-level cohort: 32 796 adults with diabetes were represented (3.4% with T1D, 96.6% with T2D; 72.7% publicly insured or uninsured). Florida had higher rates of uninsured (p<0.0001), lower continuous glucose monitor (CGM) use (18.3% Florida; 35.9% California, p<0.0001), and pump use (10.2% Florida; 26.5% California, p<0.0001), and higher proportions of people with T1D/T2D>9% HbA1c (p<0.001). Risk was stratified within states with NHB participants having higher HbA1c (mean 9.5 (95% CI 8.9, 10.0) compared with NHW with a mean of 8.4 (95% CI 7.8, 9.0), p=0.0058), lower pump use (p=0.0426) and CGM use (p=0.0192). People who prefer to speak English were more likely to use a CGM (p=0.0386).

Conclusions: Characteristics of medically underserved communities with diabetes vary by state and by race and ethnicity. Florida's lack of Medicaid expansion could be a factor in worsened risks for vulnerable communities with diabetes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
并非所有的糖尿病医疗不平等现象都是平等的:两个医疗服务不足群体的比较。
导言:糖尿病存在社会经济地位、种族和民族差异。本研究旨在对加利福尼亚州和佛罗里达州的两组糖尿病患者进行比较,以更好地阐明在服务不足的社区中,健康结果是如何根据州的位置、种族和民族进行分层的:作为大型 ECHO 糖尿病项目的一部分,从 20 个联邦合格卫生中心招募了两个组群进行比较。参与者层面的数据包括调查和 HbA1c 采集。中心层面的数据包括医疗保健效果数据和信息集指标。人口统计学特征按州汇总(频率、百分比、平均值(95% CIs))。使用广义线性混合模型计算和比较模型估计的比率和均值:参与者队列:共招募了 582 名成人糖尿病患者(33.0% 为 1 型糖尿病 (T1D),67.0% 为 2 型糖尿病 (T2D))。平均年龄为 51.1 岁 (95% CI 49.5, 52.6);80.7% 有公共保险或无保险;43.7% 为非西班牙裔白人 (NHW),31.6% 为西班牙裔,7.9% 为非西班牙裔黑人 (NHB),16.8% 为其他。中心水平队列:32 796 名成年糖尿病患者(3.4% 患有 T1D,96.6% 患有 T2D;72.7% 有公共保险或无保险)。佛罗里达州的未参保率较高(P9% HbA1c(P结论:医疗服务不足的糖尿病社区的特征因州、种族和民族而异。佛罗里达州没有扩大医疗补助范围,这可能是导致糖尿病弱势群体风险恶化的一个因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
123
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care is an open access journal committed to publishing high-quality, basic and clinical research articles regarding type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and associated complications. Only original content will be accepted, and submissions are subject to rigorous peer review to ensure the publication of high-quality — and evidence-based — original research articles.
期刊最新文献
Clinical utility of novel diabetes subgroups in predicting vascular complications and mortality: up to 25 years of follow-up of the HUNT Study. Association between RDW-SD and prognosis across glycemic status in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Widening the phenotypic spectrum caused by pathogenic PDX1 variants in individuals with neonatal diabetes. Identification of atypical pediatric diabetes mellitus cases using electronic medical records. Type 2 diabetes complications in ethnic minority compared with European host populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1