Parents' experiences with sequencing of all known pediatric cancer predisposition genes in children with cancer.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY Genetics in Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1016/j.gim.2024.101250
S B B Bon, R H P Wouters, J J Bakhuizen, M M van den Heuvel-Eibrink, H Maurice-Stam, M C J Jongmans, M A Grootenhuis
{"title":"Parents' experiences with sequencing of all known pediatric cancer predisposition genes in children with cancer.","authors":"S B B Bon, R H P Wouters, J J Bakhuizen, M M van den Heuvel-Eibrink, H Maurice-Stam, M C J Jongmans, M A Grootenhuis","doi":"10.1016/j.gim.2024.101250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Germline DNA sequencing is increasingly used within pediatric oncology, yet parental experiences remain underexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Parents of children undergoing cancer predisposition gene panel sequencing (143 genes) were surveyed before and after disclosure of results. Questionnaires assessed knowledge, expectations, worries, satisfaction, and regret. Next to descriptives, linear mixed models and generalized mixed models were utilized to explore factors associated with knowledge and worries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 325 eligible families, 310 parents (176 mothers and 128 fathers of 188 families) completed all after-consent questionnaires, whereas 260 parents (150 mothers and 110 fathers of 181 families) completed all after disclosure questionnaires. Most parents hoped their participation would benefit others, although individual hopes were also common. Sequencing-related worries were common, particularly concerning whether their child would get cancer again, cancer risks for family members and psychosocial implications of testing. Parental satisfaction after disclosure was high and regret scores were low. Lower education was associated with lower knowledge levels, whereas foreign-born parents were at increased risk of experiencing worries.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Germline sequencing of children with cancer is generally well received by their parents. However, careful genetic counseling is essential to ensure that parents are adequately informed and supported throughout the process.</p>","PeriodicalId":12717,"journal":{"name":"Genetics in Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2024.101250","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Germline DNA sequencing is increasingly used within pediatric oncology, yet parental experiences remain underexplored.

Methods: Parents of children undergoing cancer predisposition gene panel sequencing (143 genes) were surveyed before and after disclosure of results. Questionnaires assessed knowledge, expectations, worries, satisfaction, and regret. Next to descriptives, linear mixed models and generalized mixed models were utilized to explore factors associated with knowledge and worries.

Results: Out of 325 eligible families, 310 parents (176 mothers and 128 fathers of 188 families) completed all after-consent questionnaires, whereas 260 parents (150 mothers and 110 fathers of 181 families) completed all after disclosure questionnaires. Most parents hoped their participation would benefit others, although individual hopes were also common. Sequencing-related worries were common, particularly concerning whether their child would get cancer again, cancer risks for family members and psychosocial implications of testing. Parental satisfaction after disclosure was high and regret scores were low. Lower education was associated with lower knowledge levels, whereas foreign-born parents were at increased risk of experiencing worries.

Conclusion: Germline sequencing of children with cancer is generally well received by their parents. However, careful genetic counseling is essential to ensure that parents are adequately informed and supported throughout the process.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症患儿家长对所有已知儿科癌症易感基因进行测序的经验。
目的:种系 DNA 测序在儿科肿瘤学中的应用越来越广泛,但对家长的经历却缺乏研究:方法:在结果公布前后,对接受癌症易感基因面板测序(143 个基因)的儿童家长进行了调查。问卷调查内容包括知识、期望、担忧、满意度和遗憾。除描述外,还利用线性混合模型和广义混合模型来探讨与知识和担忧相关的因素:在 325 个符合条件的家庭中,310 名家长(188 个家庭中的 176 名母亲和 128 名父亲)完成了所有同意后问卷,而 260 名家长(181 个家庭中的 150 名母亲和 110 名父亲)完成了所有披露后问卷。大多数家长希望他们的参与能使他人受益,尽管个人希望也很普遍。与序列相关的担忧很常见,尤其是关于孩子是否会再次患癌、家庭成员患癌的风险以及检测对社会心理的影响。披露信息后,家长的满意度较高,后悔得分较低。受教育程度较低与知识水平较低有关,而外国出生的父母出现担忧的风险较高:结论:癌症患儿的种系测序通常会受到家长的欢迎。结论:癌症患儿的基因测序一般都会受到家长的欢迎,但要确保家长在整个过程中获得充分的信息和支持,细致的遗传咨询是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Genetics in Medicine
Genetics in Medicine 医学-遗传学
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
6.80%
发文量
857
审稿时长
1.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Genetics in Medicine (GIM) is the official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. The journal''s mission is to enhance the knowledge, understanding, and practice of medical genetics and genomics through publications in clinical and laboratory genetics and genomics, including ethical, legal, and social issues as well as public health. GIM encourages research that combats racism, includes diverse populations and is written by authors from diverse and underrepresented backgrounds.
期刊最新文献
Biomarker testing for lysosomal diseases: A technical standard of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Editorial Board Masthead Table of Contents Correspondence on “The ClinGen Brain Malformation Variant Curation Expert Panel: Rules for somatic variants in AKT3, MTOR, PIK3CA, and PIK3R2” by Lai et al
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1