First Results of the Primary Outcome of a Phase 2 Prospective Clinical Trial to Assess the Feasibility of Preoperative Radiation Boost in Patients With Breast Cancer

Zeinab Abou Yehia MD , Zohaib Sherwani MD , Molly Chakraborty BS , Nisha Ohri MD , Alison Grann MD , Firas Eladoumikdachi MD , Maria Kowzun MD , Shicha Kumar MD , Lindsay Potdevin MD , Michele Blackwood MD , Deborah Toppmeyer MD , Bruce G. Haffty MD
{"title":"First Results of the Primary Outcome of a Phase 2 Prospective Clinical Trial to Assess the Feasibility of Preoperative Radiation Boost in Patients With Breast Cancer","authors":"Zeinab Abou Yehia MD ,&nbsp;Zohaib Sherwani MD ,&nbsp;Molly Chakraborty BS ,&nbsp;Nisha Ohri MD ,&nbsp;Alison Grann MD ,&nbsp;Firas Eladoumikdachi MD ,&nbsp;Maria Kowzun MD ,&nbsp;Shicha Kumar MD ,&nbsp;Lindsay Potdevin MD ,&nbsp;Michele Blackwood MD ,&nbsp;Deborah Toppmeyer MD ,&nbsp;Bruce G. Haffty MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.08.043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>A radiation therapy (RT) boost to the tumor bed is an important component of breast-conserving therapy in early breast cancer. This prospective phase 2 study assessed the feasibility of delivering the RT boost before surgery. We hypothesize wound complication rates to be comparable with postoperative RT and the target boost volume to be smaller than standard postoperative RT.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>This prospective phase 2 trial accrued 55 patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer eligible for breast-conserving therapy. Patients were treated with preoperative RT boost of 1332 cGy in 4 fractions, followed by lumpectomy and postoperative adjuvant whole breast RT to 3663 cGy in 11 fractions. The primary outcome was to demonstrate the incidence of grade 3 or more wound complications was not inferior to lumpectomy with standard postoperative whole breast RT and boost (6%-20%). We also compared the preop boost volume with a mock boost volume that would have been done after surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifty-five women were enrolled between June 2021 and October 2022. Median age was 64 years old (range, 40-77 years). Forty-three patients had invasive cancers, and 5 had ductal carcinoma in situ. Median clinical tumor size was 13 mm (range, 5-26 mm). Grade 3 wound dehiscence requiring surgical revision occurred in 1 patient (2%). There were no other grade 3 adverse events. Three patients (6%) had grade 2 infections requiring antibiotics. The target boost volume was significantly lower than mock postoperative volume (11 cc vs 56 cc; <em>P</em> &lt; .001) Cosmetic outcome at the first follow-up was very good or excellent in 87% of patients, and none had poor cosmetic outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The use of a preoperative RT boost followed by whole breast RT as administered here resulted in an acceptable primary outcome with a similar rate of postoperative wound complications and smaller boost volume compared with standard postoperative RT. This approach is currently under consideration for cooperative group phase 3 trial.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":"121 2","pages":"Pages 333-340"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360301624033200","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

A radiation therapy (RT) boost to the tumor bed is an important component of breast-conserving therapy in early breast cancer. This prospective phase 2 study assessed the feasibility of delivering the RT boost before surgery. We hypothesize wound complication rates to be comparable with postoperative RT and the target boost volume to be smaller than standard postoperative RT.

Methods and Materials

This prospective phase 2 trial accrued 55 patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer eligible for breast-conserving therapy. Patients were treated with preoperative RT boost of 1332 cGy in 4 fractions, followed by lumpectomy and postoperative adjuvant whole breast RT to 3663 cGy in 11 fractions. The primary outcome was to demonstrate the incidence of grade 3 or more wound complications was not inferior to lumpectomy with standard postoperative whole breast RT and boost (6%-20%). We also compared the preop boost volume with a mock boost volume that would have been done after surgery.

Results

Fifty-five women were enrolled between June 2021 and October 2022. Median age was 64 years old (range, 40-77 years). Forty-three patients had invasive cancers, and 5 had ductal carcinoma in situ. Median clinical tumor size was 13 mm (range, 5-26 mm). Grade 3 wound dehiscence requiring surgical revision occurred in 1 patient (2%). There were no other grade 3 adverse events. Three patients (6%) had grade 2 infections requiring antibiotics. The target boost volume was significantly lower than mock postoperative volume (11 cc vs 56 cc; P < .001) Cosmetic outcome at the first follow-up was very good or excellent in 87% of patients, and none had poor cosmetic outcomes.

Conclusion

The use of a preoperative RT boost followed by whole breast RT as administered here resulted in an acceptable primary outcome with a similar rate of postoperative wound complications and smaller boost volume compared with standard postoperative RT. This approach is currently under consideration for cooperative group phase 3 trial.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估乳腺癌患者术前放射增强治疗可行性的 II 期前瞻性临床试验的初步结果。
导言:对肿瘤床进行放射治疗(RT)是早期乳腺癌保乳治疗(BCT)的重要组成部分。这项前瞻性 II 期研究评估了术前进行 RT 增量的可行性。我们假设伤口并发症发生率与术后 RT 相当,目标增量小于标准术后 RT:这项前瞻性 II 期试验共招募了 55 名符合 BCT 条件的临床结节阴性 BC 患者。患者在术前接受4次分次1332 cGy的RT增强治疗,随后进行肿块切除术,术后辅助全乳腺RT为11次分次3663 cGy。主要结果是证明 3 级或以上伤口并发症的发生率不低于肿块切除术和标准术后全乳 RT 和增强(6%- 20%)。我们还将术前增强剂量与术后模拟增强剂量进行了比较:55 名妇女在 2021 年 6 月至 2022 年 10 月期间入组。中位年龄为 64 岁(40-77 岁不等)。43名患者患有浸润性癌症,5名患者患有DCIS。临床肿瘤大小中位数为 13 毫米(5-26 毫米不等)。有一名患者(2%)出现了需要手术翻修的3级伤口裂开。没有其他3级不良事件。三名患者(6%)发生了二级感染,需要使用抗生素。目标增量明显低于模拟术后增量(11 毫升对 56 毫升;P 结论:术前使用 RT 增量的效果更好:与标准术后 RT 相比,使用术前 RT 增强后进行全乳房 RT 的主要结果是可以接受的,术后伤口并发症发生率相似,增强量较小。这种方法目前正在考虑进行合作组 III 期试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2538
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field. This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.
期刊最新文献
Proton-Photon Comparative Planning for Pediatric CNS Tumors: First Experiences of the Australian Bragg Centre for Proton Therapy and Research How to Improve the Implementation of New Radiotherapy Guidelines? Interests and Llimits of a National Training Workshop Patterns of Care and Disparities for Access to Proton Therapy for Pediatric Patients in Alberta (2010-2022) Clinical Outcomes of Radiation Therapy for Brain Stem Glioma Radiation Therapy for Pleuropulmonary Blastoma: A Case Report and Review of Literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1