Modified radioimmunoassay versus ELISA to quantify anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies in a mouse model of myasthenia gravis

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Journal of immunological methods Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1016/j.jim.2024.113748
{"title":"Modified radioimmunoassay versus ELISA to quantify anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies in a mouse model of myasthenia gravis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jim.2024.113748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In mouse models of myasthenia gravis (MG), anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibodies can be quantified to monitor disease progression and treatment response. In mice, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is the gold standard to quantify these antibodies. However, this method requires antigen purification, which is both time-consuming and expensive. In humans, radioimmunoassay (RIA)—which is more sensitive than ELISA—is commonly used to quantify AChR antibodies. At present, however, no commercial RIA kits are available to quantify these antibodies in mice. The aim of this study was to compare a modified commercial human RIA kit to two ELISA methods to detect AChR antibodies in an experimental autoimmune mouse model of MG (EAMG). C57BL/6 J mice were immunized with purified AChR from <em>Tetronarce californica</em> (T-AChR). Serum samples were analyzed by RIA and two ELISAs (T-AChR and purified mouse AChR peptide [m-AChR]). The modified RIA showed excellent sensitivity (84.1 %) and specificity (100 %) for the detection of AChR antibodies. RIA showed a good agreement with T-AChR ELISA (κ = 0.69) but only moderate agreement with m-AChR ELISA (κ = 0.49). These results demonstrate the feasibility of modifying a commercially-available RIA kit to quantify AChR antibodies in EAMG. The advantage of this technique is that it eliminates the need to develop the entire methodology in-house and reduces inter and intra-laboratory variability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16000,"journal":{"name":"Journal of immunological methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of immunological methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022175924001339","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In mouse models of myasthenia gravis (MG), anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibodies can be quantified to monitor disease progression and treatment response. In mice, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is the gold standard to quantify these antibodies. However, this method requires antigen purification, which is both time-consuming and expensive. In humans, radioimmunoassay (RIA)—which is more sensitive than ELISA—is commonly used to quantify AChR antibodies. At present, however, no commercial RIA kits are available to quantify these antibodies in mice. The aim of this study was to compare a modified commercial human RIA kit to two ELISA methods to detect AChR antibodies in an experimental autoimmune mouse model of MG (EAMG). C57BL/6 J mice were immunized with purified AChR from Tetronarce californica (T-AChR). Serum samples were analyzed by RIA and two ELISAs (T-AChR and purified mouse AChR peptide [m-AChR]). The modified RIA showed excellent sensitivity (84.1 %) and specificity (100 %) for the detection of AChR antibodies. RIA showed a good agreement with T-AChR ELISA (κ = 0.69) but only moderate agreement with m-AChR ELISA (κ = 0.49). These results demonstrate the feasibility of modifying a commercially-available RIA kit to quantify AChR antibodies in EAMG. The advantage of this technique is that it eliminates the need to develop the entire methodology in-house and reduces inter and intra-laboratory variability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在重症肌无力小鼠模型中量化抗乙酰胆碱受体抗体的改良放射免疫分析法与酶联免疫吸附法。
在重症肌无力(MG)小鼠模型中,抗乙酰胆碱受体(AChR)抗体可以通过量化来监测疾病进展和治疗反应。在小鼠中,酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)是量化这些抗体的黄金标准。然而,这种方法需要抗原纯化,既费时又昂贵。在人体中,放射免疫分析法(RIA)比 ELISA 更灵敏,常用于定量 AChR 抗体。但目前还没有商业化的 RIA 试剂盒可用于定量检测小鼠体内的 AChR 抗体。本研究的目的是比较改良的商用人RIA试剂盒和两种ELISA方法,以检测实验性自身免疫性小鼠MG(EAMG)模型中的AChR抗体。用纯化的加州四氢大麻酚 AChR(T-AChR)免疫 C57BL/6 J 小鼠。血清样本通过 RIA 和两种 ELISAs(T-AChR 和纯化的小鼠 AChR 肽 [m-AChR])进行分析。改良的 RIA 在检测 AChR 抗体方面表现出极高的灵敏度(84.1%)和特异性(100%)。RIA 与 T-AChR ELISA(κ = 0.69)的一致性很好,但与 m-AChR ELISA(κ = 0.49)的一致性一般。这些结果证明了改良市售 RIA 试剂盒以量化 EAMG 中 AChR 抗体的可行性。这种技术的优点是无需在内部开发整个方法,并减少了实验室间和实验室内的变异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
120
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Immunological Methods is devoted to covering techniques for: (1) Quantitating and detecting antibodies and/or antigens. (2) Purifying immunoglobulins, lymphokines and other molecules of the immune system. (3) Isolating antigens and other substances important in immunological processes. (4) Labelling antigens and antibodies. (5) Localizing antigens and/or antibodies in tissues and cells. (6) Detecting, and fractionating immunocompetent cells. (7) Assaying for cellular immunity. (8) Documenting cell-cell interactions. (9) Initiating immunity and unresponsiveness. (10) Transplanting tissues. (11) Studying items closely related to immunity such as complement, reticuloendothelial system and others. (12) Molecular techniques for studying immune cells and their receptors. (13) Imaging of the immune system. (14) Methods for production or their fragments in eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells. In addition the journal will publish articles on novel methods for analysing the organization, structure and expression of genes for immunologically important molecules such as immunoglobulins, T cell receptors and accessory molecules involved in antigen recognition, processing and presentation. Submitted full length manuscripts should describe new methods of broad applicability to immunology and not simply the application of an established method to a particular substance - although papers describing such applications may be considered for publication as a short Technical Note. Review articles will also be published by the Journal of Immunological Methods. In general these manuscripts are by solicitation however anyone interested in submitting a review can contact the Reviews Editor and provide an outline of the proposed review.
期刊最新文献
Workflow improvement and financial gain after integration of high-throughput sample processing system with flow cytometer in a high-volume pathology laboratory: Results from a prospective comparative study using Lean principles Development of a novel and broadly applicable sandwich ELISA assay based on rabbit single-chain variable fragments and a modified Ig-binding domain of protein L fused to a polystyrene-binding peptide Epitope profiling of cow's milk allergen-specific antibodies with determining IgE content in epitopes-ALL, a 14-epitopes mixture. A note of caution for using calmodulin antibodies. Decreased variability in the site-specific results during participation in the External Quality Assurance Program Oversight Laboratory (EQAPOL) proficiency program for IFN-gamma enzyme-linked immunospot (IFN-γ ELISpot) assay
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1