Prognostic outcome of intravenous thrombolysis in elderly patients aged ≥ 60 years with acute ischemic stroke by ASTRAL and THRIVE scales.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1007/s11239-024-03039-1
Yani Fan, Guoyan Shi, Sujie Wang, Yadan Lu, Xianghui Kong, Lili Chen
{"title":"Prognostic outcome of intravenous thrombolysis in elderly patients aged ≥ 60 years with acute ischemic stroke by ASTRAL and THRIVE scales.","authors":"Yani Fan, Guoyan Shi, Sujie Wang, Yadan Lu, Xianghui Kong, Lili Chen","doi":"10.1007/s11239-024-03039-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to validate the predictive performance of ASTRAL and THRIVE scales when used for patients aged 60 years and older with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). All enrolled patients received IVT therapy. The enrolled patients were divided into two groups in accordance with the modified Rankin scale(mRS) score at the time of discharge: good-outcome (mRS ≤ 2) and poor-outcome (mRS ≥ 3) groups. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted using MedCalc software, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated. The Delong test was used to compare the predictive performance of ASTRAL and THRIVE scales, with P < 0.05 being considered a statistically significant difference. The AUCs of ASTRAL and THRIVE in predicting poor outcomes after thrombolysis in elderly patients with AIS were 0.771 and 0.701, respectively. The difference in AUC between ASTRAL and THRIVE was 0.070, and a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) was found. ASTRAL's predictive performance was better than that of THRIVE. ASTRAL is a reliable predictive tool for assessing the poor outcome of IVT therapy for elderly patients aged ≥ 60 years with AIS.</p>","PeriodicalId":17546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-024-03039-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to validate the predictive performance of ASTRAL and THRIVE scales when used for patients aged 60 years and older with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). All enrolled patients received IVT therapy. The enrolled patients were divided into two groups in accordance with the modified Rankin scale(mRS) score at the time of discharge: good-outcome (mRS ≤ 2) and poor-outcome (mRS ≥ 3) groups. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted using MedCalc software, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated. The Delong test was used to compare the predictive performance of ASTRAL and THRIVE scales, with P < 0.05 being considered a statistically significant difference. The AUCs of ASTRAL and THRIVE in predicting poor outcomes after thrombolysis in elderly patients with AIS were 0.771 and 0.701, respectively. The difference in AUC between ASTRAL and THRIVE was 0.070, and a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) was found. ASTRAL's predictive performance was better than that of THRIVE. ASTRAL is a reliable predictive tool for assessing the poor outcome of IVT therapy for elderly patients aged ≥ 60 years with AIS.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ASTRAL 和 THRIVE 量表对≥60 岁急性缺血性脑卒中老年患者静脉溶栓预后的评估。
本研究旨在验证 ASTRAL 和 THRIVE 量表对 60 岁及以上急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)患者静脉溶栓(IVT)后的预测性能。所有入组患者均接受了静脉溶栓治疗。根据患者出院时的改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分将其分为两组:良好结果组(mRS≤2)和不良结果组(mRS≥3)。使用 MedCalc 软件绘制接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线,并计算 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)。德隆检验用于比较 ASTRAL 和 THRIVE 量表的预测性能,P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis is a long-awaited resource for contemporary cardiologists, hematologists, vascular medicine specialists and clinician-scientists actively involved in treatment decisions and clinical investigation of thrombotic disorders involving the cardiovascular and cerebrovascular systems. The principal focus of the Journal centers on the pathobiology of thrombosis and vascular disorders and the use of anticoagulants, platelet antagonists, cell-based therapies and interventions in scientific investigation, clinical-translational research and patient care. The Journal will publish original work which emphasizes the interface between fundamental scientific principles and clinical investigation, stimulating an interdisciplinary and scholarly dialogue in thrombosis and vascular science. Published works will also define platforms for translational research, drug development, clinical trials and patient-directed applications. The Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis'' integrated format will expand the reader''s knowledge base and provide important insights for both the investigation and direct clinical application of the most rapidly growing fields in medicine-thrombosis and vascular science.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the causal inference of inflammatory bowel disease and ischemic stroke: a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study. Assessment of anticoagulant safety and coagulation analysis in mice using the VETSCAN® VSpro analyzer. Correction: Factor XIa inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for atherothrombosis. Evaluation of unfractionated heparin therapy for venous thromboembolism using adjusted body weight in elderly or higher weight patients. Letter by Pirera et al regarding the paper "Direct oral anticoagulants in embolic stroke of undetermined source: an updated meta-analysis" by Marinheiro and colleagues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1