Alison R. Bamford , Jenna N. Adams , Soyun Kim , Liv C. McMillan , Rond Malhas , Mark Mapstone , Brian D. Hitt , Michael A. Yassa , Elizabeth A. Thomas
{"title":"The amyloid beta 42/38 ratio as a plasma biomarker of early memory deficits in cognitively unimpaired older adults","authors":"Alison R. Bamford , Jenna N. Adams , Soyun Kim , Liv C. McMillan , Rond Malhas , Mark Mapstone , Brian D. Hitt , Michael A. Yassa , Elizabeth A. Thomas","doi":"10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2024.08.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The amyloid beta (Aβ) 42/40 ratio has been widely studied as a biomarker in Alzheimer’s disease (AD); however, other Aβ peptides could also represent relevant biomarkers. We measured levels of Aβ38/40/42 in plasma samples from cognitively-unimpaired older adults and determined the relationships between Aβ levels and amyloid positron-emission-tomography (PET) and performance on a learning and memory task. We found that all Aβ peptides individually and the Aβ42/40 ratio, but not the Aβ42/38 ratio, were significantly correlated with brain amyloid (Aβ-PET). Multiple linear modeling, adjusting for age, sex, education, <em>APOE4</em> and Aβ-PET showed significant associations between the Aβ42/38 ratio and memory. Further, associations between the Aβ42/38 ratio and learning scores were stronger in males and in Aβ-PET-negative individuals. In contrast, no significant associations were detected between the Aβ42/40 ratio and any learning measure. These studies implicate the Aβ42/38 ratio as a biomarker to assess early memory deficits and underscore the utility of the Aβ38 fragment as an important biomarker in the AD field.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19110,"journal":{"name":"Neurobiology of Aging","volume":"144 ","pages":"Pages 12-18"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197458024001465/pdfft?md5=8c0c03c060a0f5e56ad007395fbc003b&pid=1-s2.0-S0197458024001465-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurobiology of Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197458024001465","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The amyloid beta (Aβ) 42/40 ratio has been widely studied as a biomarker in Alzheimer’s disease (AD); however, other Aβ peptides could also represent relevant biomarkers. We measured levels of Aβ38/40/42 in plasma samples from cognitively-unimpaired older adults and determined the relationships between Aβ levels and amyloid positron-emission-tomography (PET) and performance on a learning and memory task. We found that all Aβ peptides individually and the Aβ42/40 ratio, but not the Aβ42/38 ratio, were significantly correlated with brain amyloid (Aβ-PET). Multiple linear modeling, adjusting for age, sex, education, APOE4 and Aβ-PET showed significant associations between the Aβ42/38 ratio and memory. Further, associations between the Aβ42/38 ratio and learning scores were stronger in males and in Aβ-PET-negative individuals. In contrast, no significant associations were detected between the Aβ42/40 ratio and any learning measure. These studies implicate the Aβ42/38 ratio as a biomarker to assess early memory deficits and underscore the utility of the Aβ38 fragment as an important biomarker in the AD field.
期刊介绍:
Neurobiology of Aging publishes the results of studies in behavior, biochemistry, cell biology, endocrinology, molecular biology, morphology, neurology, neuropathology, pharmacology, physiology and protein chemistry in which the primary emphasis involves mechanisms of nervous system changes with age or diseases associated with age. Reviews and primary research articles are included, occasionally accompanied by open peer commentary. Letters to the Editor and brief communications are also acceptable. Brief reports of highly time-sensitive material are usually treated as rapid communications in which case editorial review is completed within six weeks and publication scheduled for the next available issue.