Effect of omentum preservation on long-term prognosis of locally advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY World Journal of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1186/s12957-024-03521-3
Xiaoshuai Zhou, Wentao Sheng, Tongmin Huang, Wei Ren
{"title":"Effect of omentum preservation on long-term prognosis of locally advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Xiaoshuai Zhou, Wentao Sheng, Tongmin Huang, Wei Ren","doi":"10.1186/s12957-024-03521-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effect of omentum preservation (OP) on locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the long-term prognosis of LAGC patients with OP versus omentum resection (OR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted up until February 2024. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 12.0 software. The primary outcome was to assess the impact of OP on the long-term prognosis of patients with LAGC, including overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of six case-control studies were included, encompassing a cohort of 1897 patients. The OP group consisted of 844 patients, while the OR group comprised 1053 patients. The study results showed that the OS (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.58-0.90, P = 0.003) and 5-year RFS (HR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.63-0.99, P = 0.038) in the OP group were superior to those observed in the OR group. Subgroup analysis indicated that 5-year OS (HR = 0.64, P = 0.003) and 5-year RFS (HR = 0.69, P = 0.005) in the OP group were also better than those in the OR group in Korea. However, the subgroup analysis conducted on stage T3-T4 tumors revealed no statistically significant differences in OS (P = 0.083) and 5-year RFS (P = 0.173) between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with OR, OP shows non-inferiority in patients with LAGC and can be considered a potential treatment option for radical gastrectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23856,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11378409/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-024-03521-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The effect of omentum preservation (OP) on locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the long-term prognosis of LAGC patients with OP versus omentum resection (OR).

Methods: A comprehensive search of databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted up until February 2024. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 12.0 software. The primary outcome was to assess the impact of OP on the long-term prognosis of patients with LAGC, including overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

Results: A total of six case-control studies were included, encompassing a cohort of 1897 patients. The OP group consisted of 844 patients, while the OR group comprised 1053 patients. The study results showed that the OS (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.58-0.90, P = 0.003) and 5-year RFS (HR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.63-0.99, P = 0.038) in the OP group were superior to those observed in the OR group. Subgroup analysis indicated that 5-year OS (HR = 0.64, P = 0.003) and 5-year RFS (HR = 0.69, P = 0.005) in the OP group were also better than those in the OR group in Korea. However, the subgroup analysis conducted on stage T3-T4 tumors revealed no statistically significant differences in OS (P = 0.083) and 5-year RFS (P = 0.173) between the two groups.

Conclusion: Compared with OR, OP shows non-inferiority in patients with LAGC and can be considered a potential treatment option for radical gastrectomy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
保留网膜对局部晚期胃癌长期预后的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:保留网膜(OP)对局部晚期胃癌(LAGC)的影响仍存在争议。本研究旨在探讨保留网膜手术(OP)与网膜切除术(OR)对局部晚期胃癌患者长期预后的影响:截至 2024 年 2 月,对包括 PubMed、Web of Science、Embase 和 Cochrane Library 在内的数据库进行了全面检索。统计分析使用 Stata 12.0 软件进行。主要结果是评估 OP 对 LAGC 患者长期预后的影响,包括总生存期(OS)和无复发生存期(RFS):结果:共纳入了六项病例对照研究,包括 1897 例患者。OP组有844名患者,OR组有1053名患者。研究结果显示,OP 组的 OS(HR = 0.72,95% CI:0.58-0.90,P = 0.003)和 5 年 RFS(HR = 0.79,95% CI:0.63-0.99,P = 0.038)优于 OR 组。亚组分析表明,在韩国,OP 组的 5 年 OS(HR = 0.64,P = 0.003)和 5 年 RFS(HR = 0.69,P = 0.005)也优于 OR 组。然而,对T3-T4期肿瘤进行的亚组分析显示,两组的OS(P = 0.083)和5年RFS(P = 0.173)差异无统计学意义:结论:与 OR 相比,OP 在 LAGC 患者中显示出非劣势,可视为根治性胃切除术的一种潜在治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.60%
发文量
362
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgical Oncology publishes articles related to surgical oncology and its allied subjects, such as epidemiology, cancer research, biomarkers, prevention, pathology, radiology, cancer treatment, clinical trials, multimodality treatment and molecular biology. Emphasis is placed on original research articles. The journal also publishes significant clinical case reports, as well as balanced and timely reviews on selected topics. Oncology is a multidisciplinary super-speciality of which surgical oncology forms an integral component, especially with solid tumors. Surgical oncologists around the world are involved in research extending from detecting the mechanisms underlying the causation of cancer, to its treatment and prevention. The role of a surgical oncologist extends across the whole continuum of care. With continued developments in diagnosis and treatment, the role of a surgical oncologist is ever-changing. Hence, World Journal of Surgical Oncology aims to keep readers abreast with latest developments that will ultimately influence the work of surgical oncologists.
期刊最新文献
Prophylactic para-aortic lymph node dissection in Colo-rectal cancer; pilot study Association of CYP7B1 expression with the prognosis of endometrial cancer: a retrospective study Correction: The therapeutic effect of radiotherapy combined with systemic therapy compared to radiotherapy alone in patients with simple brain metastasis after first-line treatment of limited-stage small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study Clinicopathological characteristics and survival analysis of different molecular subtypes of breast invasive ductal carcinoma achieving pathological complete response through neoadjuvant chemotherapy Survival in medullary thyroid carcinoma patients who fail to achieve a biochemical cure: implications of postoperative 1-month calcitonin levels and targeted therapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1