Significance and Priority of Surgical Resection as Therapeutic Strategy Based on Clinical Characteristics of Brain Metastases from Renal Cell Carcinoma.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY World neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2024.08.166
Yohei Yamamoto, Kyoichi Tomoto, Akihiko Teshigawara, Takuya Ishii, Yuzuru Hasegawa, Yasuharu Akasaki, Yuichi Murayama, Toshihide Tanaka
{"title":"Significance and Priority of Surgical Resection as Therapeutic Strategy Based on Clinical Characteristics of Brain Metastases from Renal Cell Carcinoma.","authors":"Yohei Yamamoto, Kyoichi Tomoto, Akihiko Teshigawara, Takuya Ishii, Yuzuru Hasegawa, Yasuharu Akasaki, Yuichi Murayama, Toshihide Tanaka","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.08.166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To clarify a rational surgical priority, clinical characteristics were compared between brain metastases (BM) from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and other cancers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed 425 consecutive patients with BM who underwent treatments including surgery between January 2014 and December 2022. Primary cancers included lung (n = 220), breast (n = 46), digestive (n = 65), RCC (n = 25), and others (n = 69). Tumor volume (T), edema volume (E), and edema volume/tumor volume ratio (E/T ratio) were compared between RCC and other primary cancers. Cutoff T values for identifying both symptomatic tumors and tumors suitable for surgery were determined by receiver operating characteristic curves. Factors including E/T ratio, age, Karnofsky Performance Scale score, and tumor characteristics were statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cutoff values of T and E to determine surgical suitability were 4.973 cm3 (sensitivity, 0.848; specificity, 0.74) and 23.088 cm3 (sensitivity, 0.894; specificity, 0.623), respectively. E/T ratio was significantly higher for RCC than for other cancers (P < 0.01). These results remained consistent after propensity score matching. RCC tended to show a significantly lower frequency of posterior fossa tumor (16%, P < 0.01) and higher rates of single lesions (72%, P = 0.03) and intratumoral hemorrhage (24%, P = 0.02). Subgroup analysis limited to surgical cases showed that E was consistent across tumors, T tended to be smaller, and E/T ratio was significantly higher in RCC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Generally, symptomatic BM were indicated for surgery. BM from RCC were characteristically single, low-volume lesions with expanding edema and intratumoral hemorrhage, causing symptoms. These results suggest that surgery should be a high priority for BM from RCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"e556-e566"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.08.166","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To clarify a rational surgical priority, clinical characteristics were compared between brain metastases (BM) from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and other cancers.

Methods: We reviewed 425 consecutive patients with BM who underwent treatments including surgery between January 2014 and December 2022. Primary cancers included lung (n = 220), breast (n = 46), digestive (n = 65), RCC (n = 25), and others (n = 69). Tumor volume (T), edema volume (E), and edema volume/tumor volume ratio (E/T ratio) were compared between RCC and other primary cancers. Cutoff T values for identifying both symptomatic tumors and tumors suitable for surgery were determined by receiver operating characteristic curves. Factors including E/T ratio, age, Karnofsky Performance Scale score, and tumor characteristics were statistically analyzed.

Results: Cutoff values of T and E to determine surgical suitability were 4.973 cm3 (sensitivity, 0.848; specificity, 0.74) and 23.088 cm3 (sensitivity, 0.894; specificity, 0.623), respectively. E/T ratio was significantly higher for RCC than for other cancers (P < 0.01). These results remained consistent after propensity score matching. RCC tended to show a significantly lower frequency of posterior fossa tumor (16%, P < 0.01) and higher rates of single lesions (72%, P = 0.03) and intratumoral hemorrhage (24%, P = 0.02). Subgroup analysis limited to surgical cases showed that E was consistent across tumors, T tended to be smaller, and E/T ratio was significantly higher in RCC.

Conclusions: Generally, symptomatic BM were indicated for surgery. BM from RCC were characteristically single, low-volume lesions with expanding edema and intratumoral hemorrhage, causing symptoms. These results suggest that surgery should be a high priority for BM from RCC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于肾细胞癌脑转移临床特征的手术切除治疗策略的意义和优先顺序。
目的为了明确合理的手术优先顺序,我们比较了肾细胞癌(RCC)和其他癌症脑转移瘤(BM)的临床特征:我们对2014年1月至2022年12月期间接受包括手术在内的治疗的425例连续脑转移患者进行了回顾性研究。原发性癌症包括肺癌(n = 220)、乳腺癌(n = 46)、消化系统癌症(n = 65)、RCC(n = 25)和其他癌症(n = 69)。对 RCC 和其他原发性癌症的肿瘤体积(T)、水肿体积(E)和水肿体积/肿瘤体积比(E/T 比)进行了比较。通过接收器操作特征曲线确定了识别无症状肿瘤和适合手术的肿瘤的临界 T 值。对E/T比值、年龄、Karnofsky表现量表评分和肿瘤特征等因素进行了统计分析:确定是否适合手术的 T 和 E 临界值分别为 4.973 cm3(敏感性 0.848;特异性 0.74)和 23.088 cm3(敏感性 0.894;特异性 0.623)。RCC的E/T比值明显高于其他癌症(P < 0.01)。这些结果在倾向评分匹配后保持一致。RCC的后窝肿瘤发生率明显较低(16%,P < 0.01),单发病灶发生率较高(72%,P = 0.03),瘤内出血发生率较高(24%,P = 0.02)。仅限于手术病例的亚组分析显示,不同肿瘤的E值一致,T值往往较小,而RCC的E/T比值明显较高:结论:一般来说,有症状的骨髓瘤适合手术治疗。结论:一般来说,有症状的骨髓瘤适合手术治疗。RCC的骨髓瘤通常是单发的低体积病变,伴有扩大性水肿和瘤内出血,从而引起症状。这些结果表明,手术应成为 RCC 肿瘤的优先选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World neurosurgery
World neurosurgery CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
1765
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal''s mission is to: -To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care. -To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide. -To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients. Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS
期刊最新文献
Endoscopic Trans-Costovertebral Approach to Thoracic Discectomy for Central Calcified Disc Herniations: A Technical Note Measurement of Resource Utilization in Spine Healthcare for Elective Spine Surgery Patients: A Systematic Review A Protocol to Preserve the Dural Safety Margin During Simultaneous Hybrid Lumbar Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy and Cervical Laminoplasty Resection of the Clinoidal Meningioma Encasing the Carotid Artery: A Complex and Delicate Surgical Procedure Relationship Between Social Media and Healthgrades Ratings for Spine Neurosurgeons
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1