State of the art and the future of microbiome-based biomarkers: a multidisciplinary Delphi consensus.

IF 20.9 1区 生物学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Lancet Microbe Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1016/j.lanmic.2024.07.011
Julie Rodriguez, Zahra Hassani, Carolina Alves Costa Silva, Fay Betsou, Federica Carraturo, Alessio Fasano, Mads Israelsen, Anandhi Iyappan, Aleksander Krag, Amira Metwaly, Robert Schierwagen, Jonel Trebicka, Hub Zwart, Joel Doré, Magali Cordaillat-Simmons, Celine Druart
{"title":"State of the art and the future of microbiome-based biomarkers: a multidisciplinary Delphi consensus.","authors":"Julie Rodriguez, Zahra Hassani, Carolina Alves Costa Silva, Fay Betsou, Federica Carraturo, Alessio Fasano, Mads Israelsen, Anandhi Iyappan, Aleksander Krag, Amira Metwaly, Robert Schierwagen, Jonel Trebicka, Hub Zwart, Joel Doré, Magali Cordaillat-Simmons, Celine Druart","doi":"10.1016/j.lanmic.2024.07.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although microbiome signatures have been identified in various contexts (ie, pathogenesis of non-communicable diseases and treatment response), qualified microbiome-based biomarkers are currently not in use in clinical practice. The Human Microbiome Action consortium initiated a Delphi survey to establish a consensus on the needs, challenges, and limitations in developing qualified microbiome-based biomarkers. The questionnaire was developed by a scientific committee via literature review and expert interviews. To ensure broad applicability of the results, 307 experts were invited to participate; 114 of them responded to the first round of the survey, 93 of whom completed the second and final round as well. The survey highlighted the experts' confidence in the potential of microbiome-based biomarkers for several indications or pathologies. The paucity of validated analytical methods appears to be the principal factor hindering the qualification of these biomarkers. The survey also showed that clinical implementation of these biomarkers would only be possible if kitted and validated molecular assays with simple interpretation are developed. This initiative serves as a foundation for designing and implementing public-private collaborative projects to overcome the challenges and promote clinical application of microbiome-based biomarkers.</p>","PeriodicalId":46633,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Microbe","volume":" ","pages":"100948"},"PeriodicalIF":20.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Microbe","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanmic.2024.07.011","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although microbiome signatures have been identified in various contexts (ie, pathogenesis of non-communicable diseases and treatment response), qualified microbiome-based biomarkers are currently not in use in clinical practice. The Human Microbiome Action consortium initiated a Delphi survey to establish a consensus on the needs, challenges, and limitations in developing qualified microbiome-based biomarkers. The questionnaire was developed by a scientific committee via literature review and expert interviews. To ensure broad applicability of the results, 307 experts were invited to participate; 114 of them responded to the first round of the survey, 93 of whom completed the second and final round as well. The survey highlighted the experts' confidence in the potential of microbiome-based biomarkers for several indications or pathologies. The paucity of validated analytical methods appears to be the principal factor hindering the qualification of these biomarkers. The survey also showed that clinical implementation of these biomarkers would only be possible if kitted and validated molecular assays with simple interpretation are developed. This initiative serves as a foundation for designing and implementing public-private collaborative projects to overcome the challenges and promote clinical application of microbiome-based biomarkers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于微生物组的生物标记物的现状与未来:多学科德尔菲共识。
虽然微生物组特征已在各种情况下(即非传染性疾病的发病机理和治疗反应)得到确定,但目前临床实践中还没有使用合格的基于微生物组的生物标志物。人类微生物组行动联盟发起了一项德尔菲调查,以就开发合格的基于微生物组的生物标记物的需求、挑战和限制达成共识。调查问卷由科学委员会通过文献查阅和专家访谈制定。为确保调查结果的广泛适用性,邀请了 307 位专家参与;其中 114 位专家对第一轮调查做出了回应,93 位专家完成了第二轮和最后一轮调查。调查显示,专家们对基于微生物的生物标记物在若干适应症或病理方面的潜力充满信心。缺乏经过验证的分析方法似乎是阻碍这些生物标志物鉴定的主要因素。调查还显示,只有开发出配套的、经过验证的、解释简单的分子检测方法,才有可能在临床上应用这些生物标记物。该倡议为设计和实施公私合作项目奠定了基础,以克服挑战并促进基于微生物组的生物标记物的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Microbe
Lancet Microbe Multiple-
CiteScore
27.20
自引率
0.80%
发文量
278
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Microbe is a gold open access journal committed to publishing content relevant to clinical microbiologists worldwide, with a focus on studies that advance clinical understanding, challenge the status quo, and advocate change in health policy.
期刊最新文献
Altered IL-6 signalling and risk of tuberculosis: a multi-ancestry mendelian randomisation study. Genomic reconstruction of an azole-resistant Candida parapsilosis outbreak and the creation of a multi-locus sequence typing scheme: a retrospective observational and genomic epidemiology study. Reassessing the role of butyrate-producing bacteria in infection risk. Using demographics of patients to inform treatment of shigellosis in England. Variability of Mycobacterium tuberculosis lipid body content in sputum and its implications for treatment response.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1