Antipsychotic exposure and infection risk in people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic: a Danish nationwide registry study.

IF 30.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Lancet Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00223-2
Vardan Nersesjan, Rune H B Christensen, Elisabeth Wreford Andersen, Daniel Kondziella, Michael E Benros
{"title":"Antipsychotic exposure and infection risk in people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic: a Danish nationwide registry study.","authors":"Vardan Nersesjan, Rune H B Christensen, Elisabeth Wreford Andersen, Daniel Kondziella, Michael E Benros","doi":"10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00223-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infection risk and mortality are increased in schizophrenia spectrum disorders, which was corroborated during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, evidence is lacking regarding the additional impact of antipsychotic drugs, and the highly debated safety of clozapine treatment during large-scale infection outbreaks. Therefore, we aimed to investigate risk of COVID-19 and non-COVID respiratory infections during exposure to antipsychotics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used several nationwide Danish registers (National Prescription Registry, National Hospital Registry, Psychiatric Research Register, Microbiology Database, Vaccination Registry, Cause of Death Registry, and Database for Labour market Research) to investigate all individuals aged 18 years or older with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder (ICD-10: F20-F29) living in Denmark between Jan 1 and March 1, 2020. Antipsychotic exposure groups were defined as prevalent-users and incident-users. The full observation period was March 1, 2020 to Dec 31, 2021. Antipsychotic exposure was defined in a time-varying manner and compared with non-exposure. Risk was calculated for mild infection outcomes (positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR and anti-infective drug prescriptions) and severe infection outcomes (hospitalisation and death) related to COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 respiratory infections. Outcomes were adjusted for demographics, socio-economic factors, and comorbidity.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of 85 083 individuals (44 293 men [52·1%] and 40 790 women [47·9%], median age 45·8 years [IQR 31·1-60·2]) with pre-existing schizophrenia spectrum disorders, 30 984 had antipsychotic exposure periods. Ethnicity data were not available. During antipsychotic exposure compared with non-exposed periods, assessing mild infection outcomes, risk of a positive SARS-CoV-2 test was decreased (hazard ratio 0·91 [95% CI 0·85-0·97]) and risk of redeeming an anti-infective drug was not statistically significantly different (1·01 [0·97-1·06]). For severe infection outcomes, COVID-19-related hospitalisation risk was increased (1·28 [1·07-1·52]) although COVID-19-related death was not statistically significantly increased (1·24 [0·82-1·86]). For non-COVID-19 respiratory infections, risk was increased both for hospitalisation (1·61 [1·44-1·79]) and death (1·61 [1·18-2·21]). Specifically, COVID-19 hospitalisation risk was increased in individuals older than 70 years, and non-COVID-19 hospitalisation risk increased in individuals older than 40 years and death risk in age groups of 50-59 years and 70-79 years. Based on homogeneity testing, no apparent excess risk of any outcome was observed with clozapine exposure compared with other antipsychotics.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>During antipsychotic exposure compared with unexposed periods, risk of severe infection outcomes increases. It seems reasonable to initiate infection countermeasures, such as pneumococcal vaccination, in people older than 40 years with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, who commence or are treated with antipsychotics. We do not suggest the avoidance of specific antipsychotics but rather adherence to treatment guidelines and a call for increased vigilance regarding this at-risk group.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Mental Health Services of the Capital Region of Denmark.</p>","PeriodicalId":48784,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"796-806"},"PeriodicalIF":30.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00223-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Infection risk and mortality are increased in schizophrenia spectrum disorders, which was corroborated during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, evidence is lacking regarding the additional impact of antipsychotic drugs, and the highly debated safety of clozapine treatment during large-scale infection outbreaks. Therefore, we aimed to investigate risk of COVID-19 and non-COVID respiratory infections during exposure to antipsychotics.

Methods: We used several nationwide Danish registers (National Prescription Registry, National Hospital Registry, Psychiatric Research Register, Microbiology Database, Vaccination Registry, Cause of Death Registry, and Database for Labour market Research) to investigate all individuals aged 18 years or older with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder (ICD-10: F20-F29) living in Denmark between Jan 1 and March 1, 2020. Antipsychotic exposure groups were defined as prevalent-users and incident-users. The full observation period was March 1, 2020 to Dec 31, 2021. Antipsychotic exposure was defined in a time-varying manner and compared with non-exposure. Risk was calculated for mild infection outcomes (positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR and anti-infective drug prescriptions) and severe infection outcomes (hospitalisation and death) related to COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 respiratory infections. Outcomes were adjusted for demographics, socio-economic factors, and comorbidity.

Findings: Of 85 083 individuals (44 293 men [52·1%] and 40 790 women [47·9%], median age 45·8 years [IQR 31·1-60·2]) with pre-existing schizophrenia spectrum disorders, 30 984 had antipsychotic exposure periods. Ethnicity data were not available. During antipsychotic exposure compared with non-exposed periods, assessing mild infection outcomes, risk of a positive SARS-CoV-2 test was decreased (hazard ratio 0·91 [95% CI 0·85-0·97]) and risk of redeeming an anti-infective drug was not statistically significantly different (1·01 [0·97-1·06]). For severe infection outcomes, COVID-19-related hospitalisation risk was increased (1·28 [1·07-1·52]) although COVID-19-related death was not statistically significantly increased (1·24 [0·82-1·86]). For non-COVID-19 respiratory infections, risk was increased both for hospitalisation (1·61 [1·44-1·79]) and death (1·61 [1·18-2·21]). Specifically, COVID-19 hospitalisation risk was increased in individuals older than 70 years, and non-COVID-19 hospitalisation risk increased in individuals older than 40 years and death risk in age groups of 50-59 years and 70-79 years. Based on homogeneity testing, no apparent excess risk of any outcome was observed with clozapine exposure compared with other antipsychotics.

Interpretation: During antipsychotic exposure compared with unexposed periods, risk of severe infection outcomes increases. It seems reasonable to initiate infection countermeasures, such as pneumococcal vaccination, in people older than 40 years with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, who commence or are treated with antipsychotics. We do not suggest the avoidance of specific antipsychotics but rather adherence to treatment guidelines and a call for increased vigilance regarding this at-risk group.

Funding: Mental Health Services of the Capital Region of Denmark.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 大流行期间精神分裂症谱系障碍患者的抗精神病药物暴露和感染风险:丹麦全国登记研究。
背景:精神分裂症谱系障碍患者的感染风险和死亡率增加,这一点在 COVID-19 大流行期间得到了证实。然而,关于抗精神病药物的额外影响,以及在大规模感染爆发期间氯氮平治疗的安全性备受争议,目前还缺乏相关证据。因此,我们旨在调查在接触抗精神病药物期间发生 COVID-19 和非 COVID 呼吸道感染的风险:我们利用丹麦全国范围内的多个登记簿(全国处方登记簿、全国医院登记簿、精神病学研究登记簿、微生物学数据库、疫苗接种登记簿、死因登记簿和劳动力市场研究数据库),对 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 3 月 1 日期间居住在丹麦的所有 18 岁或以上患有精神分裂症谱系障碍(ICD-10:F20-F29)的人进行了调查。抗精神病药物暴露群体被定义为普遍使用者和事件使用者。整个观察期为 2020 年 3 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日。抗精神病药物暴露以时间变化的方式进行定义,并与非暴露进行比较。计算了与 COVID-19 和非 COVID-19 呼吸道感染相关的轻度感染结果(SARS-CoV-2 PCR 阳性和抗感染药物处方)和重度感染结果(住院和死亡)的风险。结果根据人口统计学、社会经济因素和合并症进行了调整:在 85 083 名已有精神分裂症谱系障碍的患者中(男性 44 293 人[52-1%],女性 40 790 人[47-9%],中位年龄 45-8 岁[IQR 31-1-60-2]),30 984 人有过抗精神病药物接触期。种族数据不详。在抗精神病药物暴露期与非暴露期相比,评估轻度感染结果时,SARS-CoV-2 检测呈阳性的风险降低(危险比为 0-91 [95% CI 0-85-0-97]),而兑换抗感染药物的风险在统计学上没有显著差异(1-01 [0-97-1-06])。在严重感染结果方面,与 COVID-19 相关的住院风险增加(1-28 [1-07-1-52]),但与 COVID-19 相关的死亡风险在统计学上没有明显增加(1-24 [0-82-1-86])。对于非 COVID-19 呼吸道感染,住院风险(1-61 [1-44-1-79])和死亡风险(1-61 [1-18-2-21])均有所增加。具体而言,70 岁以上人群 COVID-19 住院风险增加,40 岁以上人群非 COVID-19 住院风险增加,50-59 岁和 70-79 岁年龄组死亡风险增加。根据同质性测试,与其他抗精神病药物相比,暴露于氯氮平未观察到任何结果的明显超额风险:解释:与未接触抗精神病药物的时期相比,接触抗精神病药物期间出现严重感染结果的风险会增加。对于 40 岁以上、患有精神分裂症谱系障碍、开始使用或正在使用抗精神病药物治疗的患者,采取感染应对措施(如接种肺炎球菌疫苗)似乎是合理的。我们并不建议避免使用特定的抗精神病药物,而是建议遵守治疗指南,并呼吁对这一高危人群提高警惕:资金来源:丹麦首都地区心理健康服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Psychiatry
Lancet Psychiatry PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
58.30
自引率
0.90%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Lancet Psychiatry is a globally renowned and trusted resource for groundbreaking research in the field of psychiatry. We specialize in publishing original studies that contribute to transforming and shedding light on important aspects of psychiatric practice. Our comprehensive coverage extends to diverse topics including psychopharmacology, psychotherapy, and psychosocial approaches that address psychiatric disorders throughout the lifespan. We aim to channel innovative treatments and examine the biological research that forms the foundation of such advancements. Our journal also explores novel service delivery methods and promotes fresh perspectives on mental illness, emphasizing the significant contributions of social psychiatry.
期刊最新文献
Practice and policy Correction to Lancet Psychiatry 2024; 11: 1012–21 Are global estimates of minimally adequate treatment for major depressive disorder based on minimally adequate data? Psychological interventions to prevent depression: a cause for hope Psychiatry and nephrology partnering to improve quality of care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1