Barriers and facilitators for the implementation of electronic dental record systems: Perspectives from a developing country

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS International Journal of Medical Informatics Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105622
{"title":"Barriers and facilitators for the implementation of electronic dental record systems: Perspectives from a developing country","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The need for dental data in healthcare services and the inadequacy of paper records due to their inherent limitations have led to a shift towards electronic dental record systems (EDR). Implementing EDR comes with numerous barriers and challenges. Therefore, this research was conducted to identify the implementation barriers and facilitators for EDRs.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study was conducted on dentists working in public and private clinics in Tehran, Iran. A questionnaire consisting of three sections was designed to collect data on the demographic information of dentists, the barriers in five categories including financial barriers (6 questions), organizational barriers (11 questions), technical barriers (5 questions), personal barriers (3 questions), and ethical and legal barriers (6 questions), as well as facilitators for the implementation of EDR (15 questions) based on the literature, using a five-point Likert scale. 130 dentists from 60 dental clinics participated in the study. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (calculating frequency distribution, mean, and standard deviation).</p><p>The mean scores were classified into four categories based on quartiles from very low importance to very high importance including very low importance (mean ≤ 1.25), low importance (1.25 ≥ mean &lt; 2.5), important (2.5 ≥ mean &lt; 3.75), and very high importance (mean ≥ 3.75). Finally, each of the barriers and facilitators among user dentists and non-user dentists was compared using the Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> test. The data were analyzed using SPSS software.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The findings indicate that dentists consider all barriers and challenges in implementing EDR to be important, and all the proposed facilitators for addressing these challenges to be very important. Among these important barriers are the rapid turnover of managers and policymakers at higher levels (3.69 out of 5) as a personal barrier, legal issues related to electronic records (3.65 out of 5) as an ethical-legal barrier, the lack of necessary standards for data exchange between different systems (3.64 out of 5) as a technical barrier, dentists’ limited awareness of the benefits of this system (3.63 out of 5) as a personal barrier, and the lack of suitable legal infrastructure for EDR implementation (3.62 out of 5) as an ethical-legal barrier. Additionally, among the very important facilitators, training dentists and staff on EDR (4.31 out of 5) is noteworthy.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>To address the important barriers to EDR implementation, including legal-ethical barriers, legal institutions, and regulators must establish relevant laws and regulations to overcome these obstacles. Furthermore, if system users learn about the features, goals, benefits, and positive impact of EDR on their work and gain the necessary awareness, their resistance to changes will decrease, and their interest and readiness to accept EDR will increase.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54950,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505624002855","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The need for dental data in healthcare services and the inadequacy of paper records due to their inherent limitations have led to a shift towards electronic dental record systems (EDR). Implementing EDR comes with numerous barriers and challenges. Therefore, this research was conducted to identify the implementation barriers and facilitators for EDRs.

Methods

This descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study was conducted on dentists working in public and private clinics in Tehran, Iran. A questionnaire consisting of three sections was designed to collect data on the demographic information of dentists, the barriers in five categories including financial barriers (6 questions), organizational barriers (11 questions), technical barriers (5 questions), personal barriers (3 questions), and ethical and legal barriers (6 questions), as well as facilitators for the implementation of EDR (15 questions) based on the literature, using a five-point Likert scale. 130 dentists from 60 dental clinics participated in the study. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (calculating frequency distribution, mean, and standard deviation).

The mean scores were classified into four categories based on quartiles from very low importance to very high importance including very low importance (mean ≤ 1.25), low importance (1.25 ≥ mean < 2.5), important (2.5 ≥ mean < 3.75), and very high importance (mean ≥ 3.75). Finally, each of the barriers and facilitators among user dentists and non-user dentists was compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. The data were analyzed using SPSS software.

Results

The findings indicate that dentists consider all barriers and challenges in implementing EDR to be important, and all the proposed facilitators for addressing these challenges to be very important. Among these important barriers are the rapid turnover of managers and policymakers at higher levels (3.69 out of 5) as a personal barrier, legal issues related to electronic records (3.65 out of 5) as an ethical-legal barrier, the lack of necessary standards for data exchange between different systems (3.64 out of 5) as a technical barrier, dentists’ limited awareness of the benefits of this system (3.63 out of 5) as a personal barrier, and the lack of suitable legal infrastructure for EDR implementation (3.62 out of 5) as an ethical-legal barrier. Additionally, among the very important facilitators, training dentists and staff on EDR (4.31 out of 5) is noteworthy.

Conclusion

To address the important barriers to EDR implementation, including legal-ethical barriers, legal institutions, and regulators must establish relevant laws and regulations to overcome these obstacles. Furthermore, if system users learn about the features, goals, benefits, and positive impact of EDR on their work and gain the necessary awareness, their resistance to changes will decrease, and their interest and readiness to accept EDR will increase.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实施电子牙科记录系统的障碍和促进因素:来自发展中国家的观点
导言:医疗保健服务对牙科数据的需求以及纸质记录因其固有的局限性而存在的不足导致了向电子牙科记录系统(EDR)的转变。实施电子病历系统会遇到许多障碍和挑战。因此,本研究旨在确定电子病历系统的实施障碍和促进因素。方法:本研究对伊朗德黑兰公立和私立诊所的牙医进行了描述性分析横截面研究。研究设计了一份由三个部分组成的调查问卷,采用五点李克特量表收集牙医的人口统计学信息、五类障碍(包括财务障碍(6 个问题)、组织障碍(11 个问题)、技术障碍(5 个问题)、个人障碍(3 个问题)、道德和法律障碍(6 个问题))以及基于文献的电子病历实施促进因素(15 个问题)。来自 60 家牙科诊所的 130 名牙医参与了研究。数据采用描述性统计(计算频数分布、平均分和标准偏差)进行分析。平均分按照从非常低重要性到非常高重要性的四分法分为四类,包括非常低重要性(平均分≤1.25)、低重要性(1.25≥平均分< 2.5)、重要(2.5≥平均分< 3.75)和非常高重要性(平均分≥3.75)。最后,使用 Mann-Whitney U 检验比较了用户牙医和非用户牙医的各项障碍和促进因素。结果研究结果表明,牙医认为实施电子病历的所有障碍和挑战都很重要,而为应对这些挑战而提出的所有促进因素都非常重要。在这些重要障碍中,作为个人障碍的是高层管理人员和决策者的快速更替(3.69 分,满分为 5 分);作为道德和法律障碍的是与电子记录相关的法律问题(3.65 分,满分为 5 分);作为技术障碍的是不同系统之间缺乏必要的数据交换标准(3.64 分,满分为 5 分);作为个人障碍的是牙医对该系统的好处认识有限(3.63 分,满分为 5 分);作为道德和法律障碍的是缺乏合适的法律基础设施来实施电子病历(3.62 分,满分为 5 分)。此外,在非常重要的促进因素中,值得注意的是对牙医和员工进行电子病历记录培训(4.31 分,满分为 5 分)。结论要解决电子病历记录实施过程中的重要障碍,包括法律道德障碍,法律机构和监管部门必须制定相关法律法规来克服这些障碍。此外,如果系统用户了解了电子数据记录程序的功能、目标、益处和对其工作的积极影响,并获得了必要的认识,他们对变革的抵触情绪就会减少,接受电子数据记录程序的兴趣和意愿就会提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Informatics
International Journal of Medical Informatics 医学-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.10%
发文量
217
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Medical Informatics provides an international medium for dissemination of original results and interpretative reviews concerning the field of medical informatics. The Journal emphasizes the evaluation of systems in healthcare settings. The scope of journal covers: Information systems, including national or international registration systems, hospital information systems, departmental and/or physician''s office systems, document handling systems, electronic medical record systems, standardization, systems integration etc.; Computer-aided medical decision support systems using heuristic, algorithmic and/or statistical methods as exemplified in decision theory, protocol development, artificial intelligence, etc. Educational computer based programs pertaining to medical informatics or medicine in general; Organizational, economic, social, clinical impact, ethical and cost-benefit aspects of IT applications in health care.
期刊最新文献
Application of the openEHR reference model for PGHD: A case study on the DH-Convener initiative Tracking provenance in clinical data warehouses for quality management Acute myocardial infarction risk prediction in emergency chest pain patients: An external validation study Healthcare professionals’ cross-organizational access to electronic health records: A scoping review Cross-modal similar clinical case retrieval using a modular model based on contrastive learning and k-nearest neighbor search
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1