A novel nomogram for predicting the prognosis of critically ill patients with EEG patterns exhibiting stimulus-induced rhythmic, periodic, or ictal discharges

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology Pub Date : 2024-09-07 DOI:10.1016/j.neucli.2024.103010
{"title":"A novel nomogram for predicting the prognosis of critically ill patients with EEG patterns exhibiting stimulus-induced rhythmic, periodic, or ictal discharges","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.neucli.2024.103010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To explore the factors associated with poor prognosis in critically ill patients with Electroencephalogram (EEG) patterns exhibiting stimulus-induced rhythmic, periodic, or ictal discharges (SIRPIDs), and to construct a prognostic prediction model.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study included a total of 53 critically ill patients with EEG patterns exhibiting SIRPIDs who were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from May 2023 to March 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on their Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at discharge: good prognosis group (0–3 points) and poor prognosis group (4–6 points). Retrospective analyses were performed on the clinical and EEG parameters of patients in both groups. Logistic regression analysis was applied to identify the risk factors related to poor prognosis in critically ill patients with EEG patterns exhibiting SIRPIDs; a risk prediction model for poor prognosis was constructed, along with an individualized predictive nomogram model, and the predictive performance and consistency of the model were evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that APACHE II score (OR=1.217, 95 %CI=1.030∼1.438), slow frequency bands or no obvious brain electrical activity (OR=8.720, 95 %CI=1.220∼62.313), and no sleep waveforms (OR=9.813, 95 %CI=1.371∼70.223) were independent risk factors for poor prognosis in patients. A regression model established based on multivariate logistic regression analysis had an area under the curve of 0.902. The model's accuracy was 90.60 %, with a sensitivity of 92.86 % and a specificity of 89.70 %. The nomogram model, after internal validation, showed a concordance index of 0.904.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A high APACHE II score, EEG patterns with slow frequency bands or no obvious brain electrical activity, and no sleep waveforms were independent risk factors for poor prognosis in patients with SIRPIDs. The nomogram model constructed based on these factors had a favorably high level of accuracy in predicting the risk of poor prognosis and held certain reference and application value for clinical neurofunctional assessment and prognostic determination.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19134,"journal":{"name":"Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0987705324000686","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To explore the factors associated with poor prognosis in critically ill patients with Electroencephalogram (EEG) patterns exhibiting stimulus-induced rhythmic, periodic, or ictal discharges (SIRPIDs), and to construct a prognostic prediction model.

Methods

This study included a total of 53 critically ill patients with EEG patterns exhibiting SIRPIDs who were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from May 2023 to March 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on their Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at discharge: good prognosis group (0–3 points) and poor prognosis group (4–6 points). Retrospective analyses were performed on the clinical and EEG parameters of patients in both groups. Logistic regression analysis was applied to identify the risk factors related to poor prognosis in critically ill patients with EEG patterns exhibiting SIRPIDs; a risk prediction model for poor prognosis was constructed, along with an individualized predictive nomogram model, and the predictive performance and consistency of the model were evaluated.

Results

Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that APACHE II score (OR=1.217, 95 %CI=1.030∼1.438), slow frequency bands or no obvious brain electrical activity (OR=8.720, 95 %CI=1.220∼62.313), and no sleep waveforms (OR=9.813, 95 %CI=1.371∼70.223) were independent risk factors for poor prognosis in patients. A regression model established based on multivariate logistic regression analysis had an area under the curve of 0.902. The model's accuracy was 90.60 %, with a sensitivity of 92.86 % and a specificity of 89.70 %. The nomogram model, after internal validation, showed a concordance index of 0.904.

Conclusions

A high APACHE II score, EEG patterns with slow frequency bands or no obvious brain electrical activity, and no sleep waveforms were independent risk factors for poor prognosis in patients with SIRPIDs. The nomogram model constructed based on these factors had a favorably high level of accuracy in predicting the risk of poor prognosis and held certain reference and application value for clinical neurofunctional assessment and prognostic determination.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测具有刺激诱发节律性、周期性或发作性放电脑电图模式的重症患者预后的新提名图
目的 探讨脑电图(EEG)模式表现为刺激诱发节律性、周期性或发作性放电(SIRPIDs)的重症患者预后不良的相关因素,并构建预后预测模型。根据患者出院时的改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分将其分为两组:预后良好组(0-3分)和预后不良组(4-6分)。对两组患者的临床和脑电图参数进行回顾性分析。应用逻辑回归分析确定了与脑电图模式表现为 SIRPIDs 的危重症患者预后不良相关的风险因素;构建了预后不良风险预测模型和个性化预测提名图模型,并评估了模型的预测性能和一致性。结果多变量逻辑回归分析显示,APACHE II评分(OR=1.217,95 %CI=1.030∼1.438)、慢频带或无明显脑电活动(OR=8.720,95 %CI=1.220∼62.313)和无睡眠波形(OR=9.813,95 %CI=1.371∼70.223)是患者预后不良的独立危险因素。基于多变量逻辑回归分析建立的回归模型的曲线下面积为 0.902。该模型的准确率为 90.60%,灵敏度为 92.86%,特异度为 89.70%。结论 APACHE II 评分高、脑电图模式为慢频带或无明显脑电活动、无睡眠波形是 SIRPIDs 患者预后不良的独立危险因素。根据这些因素构建的提名图模型在预测预后不良风险方面具有较高的准确性,对临床神经功能评估和预后判断具有一定的参考和应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
55
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Neurophysiologie Clinique / Clinical Neurophysiology (NCCN) is the official organ of the French Society of Clinical Neurophysiology (SNCLF). This journal is published 6 times a year, and is aimed at an international readership, with articles written in English. These can take the form of original research papers, comprehensive review articles, viewpoints, short communications, technical notes, editorials or letters to the Editor. The theme is the neurophysiological investigation of central or peripheral nervous system or muscle in healthy humans or patients. The journal focuses on key areas of clinical neurophysiology: electro- or magneto-encephalography, evoked potentials of all modalities, electroneuromyography, sleep, pain, posture, balance, motor control, autonomic nervous system, cognition, invasive and non-invasive neuromodulation, signal processing, bio-engineering, functional imaging.
期刊最新文献
Classical, spaced, or accelerated transcranial magnetic stimulation of motor cortex for treating neuropathic pain: A 3-arm parallel non-inferiority study Stereo electroencephalography in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia Dysfunction of the autonomic nervous system in gastro-esophageal reflux disease: Consequences for the cardiovascular system A novel nomogram for predicting the prognosis of critically ill patients with EEG patterns exhibiting stimulus-induced rhythmic, periodic, or ictal discharges Anatomical measurements and field modeling to assess transcranial magnetic stimulation motor and non-motor effects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1