Pushing through: A grounded theory of undergraduate nursing students making meaning of clinical related critical incidents

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Professional Nursing Pub Date : 2024-08-31 DOI:10.1016/j.profnurs.2024.08.011
Giuliana Harvey PhD RN , Mohamed Toufic El Hussein PhD RN NP , Catherine Carter-Snell PhD RN
{"title":"Pushing through: A grounded theory of undergraduate nursing students making meaning of clinical related critical incidents","authors":"Giuliana Harvey PhD RN ,&nbsp;Mohamed Toufic El Hussein PhD RN NP ,&nbsp;Catherine Carter-Snell PhD RN","doi":"10.1016/j.profnurs.2024.08.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Undergraduate nursing students are at risk of exposure to clinical related critical incidents. The impact on nursing students and the use of coping mechanisms and processes to make meaning of these distressing experiences are poorly understood.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The aim of this study was to provide a theoretical understanding of the processes that undergraduate nursing students use to make meaning of clinical related critical incidents.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Following the constructivist grounded theory method, a purposive sample was used to recruit 15 students enrolled in a Canadian university baccalaureate nursing program. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews over 12 months. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using constant comparison and concurrent data collection and coding.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three theoretical categories emerged from the data to explain the processes used by nursing students to make meaning of their critical incidents: distress, identity shift, and moving forward. The processes described were characterized by an overarching category of “Pushing Through.”</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The resulting theory of “Pushing Through” can be used as a lens for students and nurse educators to navigate making meaning of clinical related critical incidents. This theory highlights the significance of students' self-understanding as they explore and assemble individualized strategies and coping skills. Educators who teach in the clinical setting should prioritize the development of a trauma-informed learning environment by establishing connections and transparent expectations with learners.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Professional Nursing","volume":"55 ","pages":"Pages 32-39"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Professional Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755722324001388","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Undergraduate nursing students are at risk of exposure to clinical related critical incidents. The impact on nursing students and the use of coping mechanisms and processes to make meaning of these distressing experiences are poorly understood.

Purpose

The aim of this study was to provide a theoretical understanding of the processes that undergraduate nursing students use to make meaning of clinical related critical incidents.

Method

Following the constructivist grounded theory method, a purposive sample was used to recruit 15 students enrolled in a Canadian university baccalaureate nursing program. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews over 12 months. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using constant comparison and concurrent data collection and coding.

Results

Three theoretical categories emerged from the data to explain the processes used by nursing students to make meaning of their critical incidents: distress, identity shift, and moving forward. The processes described were characterized by an overarching category of “Pushing Through.”

Conclusion

The resulting theory of “Pushing Through” can be used as a lens for students and nurse educators to navigate making meaning of clinical related critical incidents. This theory highlights the significance of students' self-understanding as they explore and assemble individualized strategies and coping skills. Educators who teach in the clinical setting should prioritize the development of a trauma-informed learning environment by establishing connections and transparent expectations with learners.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
坚持到底护理本科生理解临床危急事件意义的基础理论
背景护理专业本科生有可能遭遇与临床相关的危急事件。本研究的目的是从理论上理解护理专业本科生对临床相关危急事件的理解过程。方法采用建构主义基础理论方法,有目的性地抽取了加拿大一所大学护理学士学位课程的 15 名学生。数据收集采用半结构式访谈法,历时 12 个月。结果从数据中产生了三个理论类别,以解释护理专业学生在关键事件中的意义过程:痛苦、身份转变和前进。结论由此产生的 "挺过 "理论可作为学生和护士教育者理解临床危急事件意义的一个视角。这一理论强调了学生在探索和组合个性化策略和应对技能时自我理解的重要性。在临床环境中进行教学的教育者应通过与学习者建立联系和透明的期望,优先发展创伤知情的学习环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The Journal will accept articles that focus on baccalaureate and higher degree nursing education, educational research, policy related to education, and education and practice partnerships. Reports of original work, research, reviews, insightful descriptions, and policy papers focusing on baccalaureate and graduate nursing education will be published.
期刊最新文献
Nursing students' personality traits, sleep quality, social media addiction, and academic performance: A multi-site structural equation model analysis Comparing characteristics of underrepresented versus majority student groups enrolled in US nursing programs Using data to drive programmatic change: Recalculating NCLEX-RN success Expanding clinical placement opportunities: Exploring night shift experiences for nursing students Newly graduated and nurse resident competencies: Perceptions of nurse faculty and acute care hospital leaders in the state of Maryland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1