Brazilian banks risk-taking and systemic risk

IF 2.9 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1016/j.qref.2024.101913
Bruna Gonçalves Fonseca Moura, Bruno Pérez Ferreira, Ana Carolina Costa Corrêa
{"title":"Brazilian banks risk-taking and systemic risk","authors":"Bruna Gonçalves Fonseca Moura,&nbsp;Bruno Pérez Ferreira,&nbsp;Ana Carolina Costa Corrêa","doi":"10.1016/j.qref.2024.101913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study analyzes the marginal contribution of Brazilian banks to the systemic risk. The objective is to identify whether banks that share common characteristics similarly contribute to systemic financial shocks. First, the risk assumed by a sample of listed banks is measured from the accounting, market, and regulatory perspectives. Sample banks were segregated using an unsupervised clustering model. The results were compared with the methodology currently used by the Central Bank of Brazil to segment the banking institutions. Finally, we evaluate the banking groups’ marginal contribution to systemic financial risk using <span><math><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mi>C</mi><mi>o</mi><mi>V</mi><mi>a</mi><mi>R</mi></mrow></math></span>. These results suggest that institutions that share similar characteristics in relation to their risk profiles behave similarly during times of greater market stress. Notably, size, geographic diversification, and liquidity were common attributes among banks contributing significantly to systemic risk during financial crises. This study advances the field of banking finance by introducing an analytical framework that goes beyond the traditional focus on bank balance sheet size, aligning with international standards for evaluating the systemic importance of financial institutions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47962,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 101913"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062976924001194","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study analyzes the marginal contribution of Brazilian banks to the systemic risk. The objective is to identify whether banks that share common characteristics similarly contribute to systemic financial shocks. First, the risk assumed by a sample of listed banks is measured from the accounting, market, and regulatory perspectives. Sample banks were segregated using an unsupervised clustering model. The results were compared with the methodology currently used by the Central Bank of Brazil to segment the banking institutions. Finally, we evaluate the banking groups’ marginal contribution to systemic financial risk using ΔCoVaR. These results suggest that institutions that share similar characteristics in relation to their risk profiles behave similarly during times of greater market stress. Notably, size, geographic diversification, and liquidity were common attributes among banks contributing significantly to systemic risk during financial crises. This study advances the field of banking finance by introducing an analytical framework that goes beyond the traditional focus on bank balance sheet size, aligning with international standards for evaluating the systemic importance of financial institutions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西银行的风险承担和系统性风险
本研究分析了巴西银行对系统性风险的边际贡献。其目的是确定具有共同特征的银行是否同样会造成系统性金融冲击。首先,从会计、市场和监管角度衡量了上市银行样本所承担的风险。使用无监督聚类模型对样本银行进行分离。结果与巴西中央银行目前使用的银行机构划分方法进行了比较。最后,我们使用 ΔCoVaR 评估了银行集团对系统性金融风险的边际贡献。这些结果表明,在市场压力较大时,风险特征相似的机构表现类似。值得注意的是,规模、地域多样化和流动性是银行的共同特征,在金融危机期间对系统性风险有显著影响。这项研究引入了一个分析框架,超越了传统上对银行资产负债表规模的关注,与评估金融机构系统重要性的国际标准保持一致,从而推动了银行金融领域的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance (QREF) attracts and publishes high quality manuscripts that cover topics in the areas of economics, financial economics and finance. The subject matter may be theoretical, empirical or policy related. Emphasis is placed on quality, originality, clear arguments, persuasive evidence, intelligent analysis and clear writing. At least one Special Issue is published per year. These issues have guest editors, are devoted to a single theme and the papers have well known authors. In addition we pride ourselves in being able to provide three to four article "Focus" sections in most of our issues.
期刊最新文献
Macro-prudential policy, digital transformations and banks’ risk-taking Financial inclusion and income distribution revisited: New findings Are there “Ratatouille” restaurants? On anticorrelation of food quality and hygiene Quantile volatility connectedness among themes and sectors: Novel evidence from China Credit ratings and corporate ESG behavior
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1