Breaking free from the invisible cage: Leveraging institutional logics to understand and facilitate organizational change projects

IF 7.4 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT International Journal of Project Management Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2024.102635
Linzhuo Wang , Xinnan Wang , Ralf Müller
{"title":"Breaking free from the invisible cage: Leveraging institutional logics to understand and facilitate organizational change projects","authors":"Linzhuo Wang ,&nbsp;Xinnan Wang ,&nbsp;Ralf Müller","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2024.102635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Organizational change projects suffer from a high failure rate. Extant literature identified structural inertia as the main cause of resistance to change. This structural inertia puts invisible shackles on organizations and makes the change process difficult or even pulls organizations back to their former state. However, it is still unknown how these organizations can be unchained. Drawing on an institutional logic perspective and based on an intriguing organizational change project of a state-owned company in China, we explored how institutional logic changes in organizational change projects. The results indicate that institutional change occurs through organizational deinstitutionalization, organizational institution building, and organizational reinstitutionalization across both individual and organizational levels. We developed a theory for successfully securing change efforts that relies on the level-crossing alteration of institutional logic that shackles employee behaviors. A model of institutional logic change is proposed to illustrate the organizational change carried out in the form of projects from an institutional logic perspective. Theoretical and practical contributions are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48429,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Project Management","volume":"42 6","pages":"Article 102635"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Project Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263786324000772","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Organizational change projects suffer from a high failure rate. Extant literature identified structural inertia as the main cause of resistance to change. This structural inertia puts invisible shackles on organizations and makes the change process difficult or even pulls organizations back to their former state. However, it is still unknown how these organizations can be unchained. Drawing on an institutional logic perspective and based on an intriguing organizational change project of a state-owned company in China, we explored how institutional logic changes in organizational change projects. The results indicate that institutional change occurs through organizational deinstitutionalization, organizational institution building, and organizational reinstitutionalization across both individual and organizational levels. We developed a theory for successfully securing change efforts that relies on the level-crossing alteration of institutional logic that shackles employee behaviors. A model of institutional logic change is proposed to illustrate the organizational change carried out in the form of projects from an institutional logic perspective. Theoretical and practical contributions are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
挣脱无形的牢笼:利用制度逻辑理解和促进组织变革项目
组织变革项目的失败率很高。现有文献指出,结构惰性是变革阻力的主要原因。这种结构性惰性给组织套上了无形的枷锁,使变革过程举步维艰,甚至将组织拉回到以前的状态。然而,如何才能解开这些组织的枷锁仍是一个未知数。我们从制度逻辑的视角出发,基于中国一家国有企业一个引人入胜的组织变革项目,探讨了制度逻辑如何在组织变革项目中发生变化。研究结果表明,制度变迁是通过组织去制度化、组织制度建设和组织再制度化的方式在个人和组织两个层面上发生的。我们提出了一套成功确保变革努力的理论,这套理论依赖于对束缚员工行为的制度逻辑的跨层次改变。我们提出了一个制度逻辑变革模型,从制度逻辑的角度说明了以项目形式开展的组织变革。讨论了理论和实践方面的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
26.20%
发文量
83
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Project Management is recognized as a premier publication in the field of project management and organization studies. Our main objective is to contribute to the advancement of project management and project organizing through the publication of groundbreaking research. We are dedicated to presenting fresh insights and new knowledge in various domains, including project management, program management, portfolio management, project-oriented organizations, project networks, and project-oriented societies. We actively encourage submissions that explore project management and organizing from the perspectives of organizational behavior, strategy, supply chain management, technology, change management, innovation, and sustainability. By publishing high-quality research articles and reviews, we strive to revolutionize the academic landscape and propel the field of project management forward. We invite researchers, scholars, and practitioners to contribute to our journal and be a part of the progressive development in this exciting field.
期刊最新文献
Empowering project team to perform: Directive and facilitative antecedents When project outcomes matter: Organizational integration in managing long-term target benefits Struggling with strategizing in public client organisations: Managing strategic projects in inter-organisational contexts Projects as drivers of sustainability: How the adoption of the reuse principle affects the front-end of a construction project Dynamics of multi-level programme integration in a strategic programme: The case of the COVID-19 vaccination campaign in France
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1