Social media and the fragility of Africa

IF 4.5 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Information Economics and Policy Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1016/j.infoecopol.2024.101104
Sylvain B. Ngassam , Simplice A. Asongu , Gildas Tiwang Ngueuleweu
{"title":"Social media and the fragility of Africa","authors":"Sylvain B. Ngassam ,&nbsp;Simplice A. Asongu ,&nbsp;Gildas Tiwang Ngueuleweu","doi":"10.1016/j.infoecopol.2024.101104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research empirically analyzes the effect of social media on fragility. It goes beyond political grounds which oppose techno-optimistic to techno-pessimistic perceptions of the impact of social media to analyze its consequences on global, security, economic and social fragilities. The research uses annual data from a panel of 47 African countries for the period 2000–2018. Results reveal that the use of social media by the public to organize offline political actions has no outcome on global fragility. However, its use by elites for the same end accentuates global state fragility. This operates through security and political fragilities. Fragility is negatively associated with higher civil society participation, education and democracy. The use of social media to organize offline political actions either by people or by elites in the context of higher civil society participation reduces fragility, while its use either by people or by elites in the context of higher educational level accentuates state fragility. The use of social media to organize offline political actions by people in the context of democracy boosts fragility but its use by elites in the same framework reduces fragility. There is a need to sensitize people, especially elites in Africa on the threats and opportunities of social media. There is also a necessity to develop a dynamic, well-educated and well-organized civil society and population in order to better valorize the opportunities that social media represents.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47029,"journal":{"name":"Information Economics and Policy","volume":"69 ","pages":"Article 101104"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016762452400026X/pdfft?md5=58f108e1a9de890b1b954ae3a5704d4d&pid=1-s2.0-S016762452400026X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Economics and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016762452400026X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research empirically analyzes the effect of social media on fragility. It goes beyond political grounds which oppose techno-optimistic to techno-pessimistic perceptions of the impact of social media to analyze its consequences on global, security, economic and social fragilities. The research uses annual data from a panel of 47 African countries for the period 2000–2018. Results reveal that the use of social media by the public to organize offline political actions has no outcome on global fragility. However, its use by elites for the same end accentuates global state fragility. This operates through security and political fragilities. Fragility is negatively associated with higher civil society participation, education and democracy. The use of social media to organize offline political actions either by people or by elites in the context of higher civil society participation reduces fragility, while its use either by people or by elites in the context of higher educational level accentuates state fragility. The use of social media to organize offline political actions by people in the context of democracy boosts fragility but its use by elites in the same framework reduces fragility. There is a need to sensitize people, especially elites in Africa on the threats and opportunities of social media. There is also a necessity to develop a dynamic, well-educated and well-organized civil society and population in order to better valorize the opportunities that social media represents.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社交媒体与非洲的脆弱性
本研究从经验角度分析了社交媒体对脆弱性的影响。它超越了将对社交媒体影响的技术乐观与技术悲观对立起来的政治理由,分析了社交媒体对全球、安全、经济和社会脆弱性的影响。研究使用了 47 个非洲国家 2000-2018 年期间的年度数据。结果显示,公众使用社交媒体组织线下政治行动对全球脆弱性没有影响。然而,精英为同一目的使用社交媒体却加剧了全球国家的脆弱性。这是通过安全和政治脆弱性来实现的。脆弱性与更高的公民社会参与度、教育和民主呈负相关。在公民社会参与度较高的情况下,民众或精英使用社交媒体组织线下政治行动会降低国家的脆弱性,而在教育水平较高的情况下,民众或精英使用社交媒体会加剧国家的脆弱性。在民主背景下,民众使用社交媒体组织线下政治行动会增强国家的脆弱性,而精英在同一框架下使用社交媒体则会降低国家的脆弱性。有必要提高人们,尤其是非洲精英对社交媒体的威胁和机遇的认识。还需要发展一个充满活力、受过良好教育和组织良好的民间社会和民众,以便更好地利用社交媒体带来的机遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
10.70%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: IEP is an international journal that aims to publish peer-reviewed policy-oriented research about the production, distribution and use of information, including these subjects: the economics of the telecommunications, mass media, and other information industries, the economics of innovation and intellectual property, the role of information in economic development, and the role of information and information technology in the functioning of markets. The purpose of the journal is to provide an interdisciplinary and international forum for theoretical and empirical research that addresses the needs of other researchers, government, and professionals who are involved in the policy-making process. IEP publishes research papers, short contributions, and surveys.
期刊最新文献
Three things about mobile app commissions Digital payment systems in emerging economies: Lessons from Kenya, India, Brazil, and Peru “I don't care about cookies!” data disclosure and time-inconsistent users Algorithms in the marketplace: An empirical analysis of automated pricing in e-commerce Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1