Validation of the Psychometric Properties of the Practice Environment Scale of Nursing Work Index (PES-NWI) Questionnaire in the Context of Kenya’s Nursing Organizational Work Culture

{"title":"Validation of the Psychometric Properties of the Practice Environment Scale of Nursing Work Index (PES-NWI) Questionnaire in the Context of Kenya’s Nursing Organizational Work Culture","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijans.2024.100750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The global shortage of nurses is posing a significant threat to the provision and sustainability of quality health care services worldwide. The importance of nursing organizational culture and validated tools to accurately measure it, is of paramount importance in mitigation of this shortage, especially in Low- and middle-income-countries like Kenya.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>This was a cross-sectional online validation survey among 212 nursing personnel working in various healthcare facilities across Kenya. The aim of the study was to assess the validity and reliability of the psychometric properties of the Practice Environment Scale of Nursing Work Index within the framework of nursing organizational culture in Kenya and determine how Kenyan nurses rate their organizational culture. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 28. Cronbach’s alpha was used to determine reliability while Exploratory Factor Analysis and Confirmatory Factor Analysis were used to test validity.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The 5-structure of Lake’s PES-NWI was unsupported by confirmatory factor analysis and a new 7-Factor Kenyan PES-NWI version was created. The new tool was reliable and with acceptable fit. Participants showed a mixed rating of their organizational culture with overall organizational culture largely rated neutral (M = 2.51, SD = 1.01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The Kenyan PES-NWI is a valid and reliable tool that could be used to assess organizational culture. The study highlighted the critical need to further develop context-specific tools to accurately measure nursing organizational culture work environments particularly in Low and-Middle-Income countries like Kenya facing significant nursing shortages. As nursing becomes increasingly dynamic and complex, it is essential for nursing and healthcare researchers to re-validate research tools to continuously improve them.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38091,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214139124000957/pdfft?md5=76da8f03154c56dcbd4fb3de8f86a9d2&pid=1-s2.0-S2214139124000957-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214139124000957","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The global shortage of nurses is posing a significant threat to the provision and sustainability of quality health care services worldwide. The importance of nursing organizational culture and validated tools to accurately measure it, is of paramount importance in mitigation of this shortage, especially in Low- and middle-income-countries like Kenya.

Methodology

This was a cross-sectional online validation survey among 212 nursing personnel working in various healthcare facilities across Kenya. The aim of the study was to assess the validity and reliability of the psychometric properties of the Practice Environment Scale of Nursing Work Index within the framework of nursing organizational culture in Kenya and determine how Kenyan nurses rate their organizational culture. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 28. Cronbach’s alpha was used to determine reliability while Exploratory Factor Analysis and Confirmatory Factor Analysis were used to test validity.

Results

The 5-structure of Lake’s PES-NWI was unsupported by confirmatory factor analysis and a new 7-Factor Kenyan PES-NWI version was created. The new tool was reliable and with acceptable fit. Participants showed a mixed rating of their organizational culture with overall organizational culture largely rated neutral (M = 2.51, SD = 1.01).

Conclusion

The Kenyan PES-NWI is a valid and reliable tool that could be used to assess organizational culture. The study highlighted the critical need to further develop context-specific tools to accurately measure nursing organizational culture work environments particularly in Low and-Middle-Income countries like Kenya facing significant nursing shortages. As nursing becomes increasingly dynamic and complex, it is essential for nursing and healthcare researchers to re-validate research tools to continuously improve them.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在肯尼亚护理组织工作文化背景下验证护理工作指数实践环境量表(PES-NWI)问卷的心理计量特性
背景全球护士短缺正在对全世界优质医疗服务的提供和可持续性构成重大威胁。护理组织文化的重要性以及对其进行精确测量的有效工具对于缓解这一短缺问题至关重要,尤其是在肯尼亚这样的中低收入国家。研究的目的是在肯尼亚护理组织文化的框架内评估护理工作指数实践环境量表心理测量特性的有效性和可靠性,并确定肯尼亚护士如何评价其组织文化。数据使用 SPSS 28 版进行分析。结果莱克的 PES-NWI 的 5 个结构没有得到确认性因素分析的支持,因此创建了一个新的 7 因子肯尼亚 PES-NWI 版本。新工具可靠且契合度可接受。受试者对其组织文化的评价不一,总体上对组织文化的评价为中性(M = 2.51,SD = 1.01)。这项研究强调,亟需进一步开发针对具体情况的工具,以准确测量护理组织文化工作环境,尤其是在肯尼亚这样面临严重护理人员短缺的中低收入国家。随着护理工作变得越来越动态和复杂,护理和医疗保健研究人员有必要重新验证研究工具,以不断改进它们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences (IJANS) is an international scientific journal published by Elsevier. The broad-based journal was founded on two key tenets, i.e. to publish the most exciting research with respect to the subjects of Nursing and Midwifery in Africa, and secondly, to advance the international understanding and development of nursing and midwifery in Africa, both as a profession and as an academic discipline. The fully refereed journal provides a forum for all aspects of nursing and midwifery sciences, especially new trends and advances. The journal call for original research papers, systematic and scholarly review articles, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing as related to nursing and midwifery in Africa, technical reports, and short communications, and which will meet the journal''s high academic and ethical standards. Manuscripts of nursing practice, education, management, and research are encouraged. The journal values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic significance for educators, practitioners, leaders and policy-makers of nursing and midwifery in Africa. The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of nursing, and is also inviting international scholars who are engaged with nursing and midwifery in Africa to contribute to the journal. We will only publish work that demonstrates the use of rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of nursing and midwifery as it relates to the Africa context.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to ‘Factors affecting HIV disclosure among partners in Morogoro, Tanzania’ [International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences Volume 10, (2019) 49-54] Tracer study to assess the employability of graduates and quality of a nursing program: A descriptive cross-sectional survey Factors that influence the quality of work life in nursing departments: A management perspective Roles, perceptions, and context of nursing student clinical facilitation in sub-Saharan Africa: An integrative review Birth stories of South African mothers of children with albinism: A critical human rights analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1