Clinician perspectives on the perioperative roles and responsibilities of anesthesia, surgery, and primary care.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY American journal of surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115948
Donna Ron, Madison M Ballacchino, Alexandra Briggs, Stacie G Deiner
{"title":"Clinician perspectives on the perioperative roles and responsibilities of anesthesia, surgery, and primary care.","authors":"Donna Ron, Madison M Ballacchino, Alexandra Briggs, Stacie G Deiner","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although high-risk older patients benefit from a multidisciplinary approach to perioperative care, the specific roles and responsibilities of the clinicians involved have yet to be adequately characterized.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with four anesthesia preoperative clinic providers, seven surgeons, and nine primary care providers in northern New England.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed both distinct and overlapping roles and responsibilities. Anesthesia providers were described as a \"safety net\" and surgeons as \"captain of the ship\", in charge of getting \"all the ducks in a row\" to avoid surgery delays and cancellations. Primary care providers saw themselves as the \"quarterback\", ensuring care continuity and consideration of patient psychosocial factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While all have a shared responsibility for facilitating patient-centered decision-making and a safe perioperative course, each discipline has different areas of focus and expertise. Role clarification can help optimize the distribution of responsibilities and enhance perioperative communication and collaboration.</p>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115948","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although high-risk older patients benefit from a multidisciplinary approach to perioperative care, the specific roles and responsibilities of the clinicians involved have yet to be adequately characterized.

Methods: Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with four anesthesia preoperative clinic providers, seven surgeons, and nine primary care providers in northern New England.

Results: The analysis revealed both distinct and overlapping roles and responsibilities. Anesthesia providers were described as a "safety net" and surgeons as "captain of the ship", in charge of getting "all the ducks in a row" to avoid surgery delays and cancellations. Primary care providers saw themselves as the "quarterback", ensuring care continuity and consideration of patient psychosocial factors.

Conclusions: While all have a shared responsibility for facilitating patient-centered decision-making and a safe perioperative course, each discipline has different areas of focus and expertise. Role clarification can help optimize the distribution of responsibilities and enhance perioperative communication and collaboration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床医生对麻醉、手术和基础护理在围手术期的作用和责任的看法。
背景:尽管高风险老年患者可从多学科围手术期护理中获益,但相关临床医生的具体角色和责任仍有待充分确定:尽管高风险老年患者受益于围术期护理的多学科方法,但相关临床医生的具体角色和责任尚未得到充分描述:方法:对新英格兰北部地区的四名麻醉术前诊所提供者、七名外科医生和九名初级保健提供者进行的半结构化访谈进行定性分析:结果:分析结果表明,他们的角色和职责既有区别又有重叠。麻醉提供者被描述为 "安全网",而外科医生被描述为 "船长",负责 "万无一失",以避免手术延误和取消。初级医疗服务提供者将自己视为 "四分卫",确保医疗服务的连续性并考虑患者的社会心理因素:虽然各学科都有责任促进以患者为中心的决策和安全的围手术期,但每个学科都有不同的重点领域和专长。明确角色有助于优化责任分配,加强围手术期的沟通与合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of ERAS protocol adherence and postoperative outcomes after major colorectal surgery in a community hospital. National trends and costs of same day discharge in patients undergoing elective minimally invasive colectomy. Variation in PTH levels and kinetics after parathyroidectomy Time is money: The return on investment of research in surgical training AJS virtual research mentor: Tips on writing an abstract for a conference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1