Clinical outcomes and coronary artery lesion characteristics of young patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction and no standard modifiable risk factors

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1002/ccd.31205
Nick S. R. Lan MBBS (Hons), MClinUS, MClinRes (Dist), MSc, HuiJun Chih BSc (Hons), PhD, Angela L. Brennan CCRN, Girish Dwivedi MD, PhD, Gemma A. Figtree MBBS, DPhil, Diem Dinh PhD, Dion Stub MBBS, PhD, Christopher M. Reid MSc, PhD, Abdul Rahman Ihdayhid MBBS (Hons), PhD, The ASPECT Investigators
{"title":"Clinical outcomes and coronary artery lesion characteristics of young patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction and no standard modifiable risk factors","authors":"Nick S. R. Lan MBBS (Hons), MClinUS, MClinRes (Dist), MSc,&nbsp;HuiJun Chih BSc (Hons), PhD,&nbsp;Angela L. Brennan CCRN,&nbsp;Girish Dwivedi MD, PhD,&nbsp;Gemma A. Figtree MBBS, DPhil,&nbsp;Diem Dinh PhD,&nbsp;Dion Stub MBBS, PhD,&nbsp;Christopher M. Reid MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Abdul Rahman Ihdayhid MBBS (Hons), PhD,&nbsp;The ASPECT Investigators","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Among ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, those with no standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRFs: hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, and smoking) have higher 30-day mortality than those with SMuRFs. Differences in coronary lesion characteristics remain unclear.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data from STEMI patients aged ≤60 years from the Asia Pacific Evaluation of Cardiovascular Therapies Network (Australia, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Singapore, and Vietnam) was retrospectively analysed. Exclusion criteria included incomplete SMuRF data, prior myocardial infarction, or prior coronary revascularisation. Lesion type was defined using the American College of Cardiology criteria. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were defined as peri-procedural myocardial infarction, emergency coronary artery bypass surgery, cerebrovascular event, or mortality. Multiple logistic regressions were used.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 4404 patients, 767 (17.4%) were SMuRFless. SMuRFless patients were more frequently younger (median age 51 vs. 53 years; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), female (22.6% <i>vs.</i> 15.5%; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), thrombolysed (20.1% vs. 12.5%; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and in cardiogenic shock (11.2% vs. 8.6%; <i>p</i> = 0.020). SMuRFless patients had significantly higher in-hospital MACE (7.2% vs. 4.3%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24–4.08; <i>p</i> = 0.008) but 1-year mortality was not significantly different (3.6% vs. 5.7%, aOR 0.58; 95% CI 0.06–6.12; <i>p</i> = 0.549). Compared with patients with SMuRFs (4918 lesions), the SMuRFless (940 lesions) had fewer type B2/C lesions (60.8% vs. 65.6%; <i>p</i> = 0.020) and fewer lesions ≥20 mm (51.1% vs. 57.1%; <i>p</i> = 0.002) but more procedural complications (5.1% vs. 2.7%; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Among young STEMI patients, the SMuRFless have shorter and less complex lesions, but worse procedural and short-term MACE outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":"104 4","pages":"714-722"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ccd.31205","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.31205","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Among ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, those with no standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRFs: hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, and smoking) have higher 30-day mortality than those with SMuRFs. Differences in coronary lesion characteristics remain unclear.

Methods

Data from STEMI patients aged ≤60 years from the Asia Pacific Evaluation of Cardiovascular Therapies Network (Australia, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Singapore, and Vietnam) was retrospectively analysed. Exclusion criteria included incomplete SMuRF data, prior myocardial infarction, or prior coronary revascularisation. Lesion type was defined using the American College of Cardiology criteria. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were defined as peri-procedural myocardial infarction, emergency coronary artery bypass surgery, cerebrovascular event, or mortality. Multiple logistic regressions were used.

Results

Of 4404 patients, 767 (17.4%) were SMuRFless. SMuRFless patients were more frequently younger (median age 51 vs. 53 years; p < 0.001), female (22.6% vs. 15.5%; p < 0.001), thrombolysed (20.1% vs. 12.5%; p < 0.001), and in cardiogenic shock (11.2% vs. 8.6%; p = 0.020). SMuRFless patients had significantly higher in-hospital MACE (7.2% vs. 4.3%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24–4.08; p = 0.008) but 1-year mortality was not significantly different (3.6% vs. 5.7%, aOR 0.58; 95% CI 0.06–6.12; p = 0.549). Compared with patients with SMuRFs (4918 lesions), the SMuRFless (940 lesions) had fewer type B2/C lesions (60.8% vs. 65.6%; p = 0.020) and fewer lesions ≥20 mm (51.1% vs. 57.1%; p = 0.002) but more procedural complications (5.1% vs. 2.7%; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Among young STEMI patients, the SMuRFless have shorter and less complex lesions, but worse procedural and short-term MACE outcomes.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ST段抬高型心肌梗死且无标准可改变危险因素的年轻患者的临床结果和冠状动脉病变特征。
背景:在ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中,无标准可改变危险因素(SMuRFs:高血压、糖尿病、高胆固醇血症和吸烟)者的30天死亡率高于有SMuRFs者。冠状动脉病变特征的差异仍不清楚:对亚太心血管治疗评估网络(澳大利亚、香港、马来西亚、新加坡和越南)中年龄≤60岁的STEMI患者的数据进行了回顾性分析。排除标准包括 SMuRF 数据不完整、曾发生过心肌梗死或曾进行过冠状动脉血运重建。病变类型根据美国心脏病学会标准定义。主要不良心血管事件(MACE)定义为术前心肌梗死、急诊冠状动脉搭桥手术、脑血管事件或死亡。采用多重逻辑回归:在4404例患者中,767例(17.4%)无SMuRF。无 SMuRF 患者更年轻(中位年龄 51 岁对 53 岁;P 结论:在年轻的 STEMI 患者中,无 SMuRF 患者更年轻(中位年龄 51 岁对 53 岁;P 结论):在年轻的 STEMI 患者中,无 SMuRF 患者的病变较短且不太复杂,但手术和短期 MACE 结果较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
419
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.
期刊最新文献
Acute Stent Thrombosis Following Reprotrusion of a Calcified Nodule in the Left Main Coronary Artery. Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Mitral Valve-In-Valve and Valve-In-Ring Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Iatrogenic Aortocoronary Dissection During Coronary Intervention: A Case Series. The Vascular Response After Balloon Angioplasty of Infrapopliteal Intermediate Stenosis Evaluated by Optical Frequency Domain Imaging. Percutaneous Treatment of Left Main Coronary Artery Ostial Stenosis After Bentall Operation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1