Teaching critical thinking about health information and choices in secondary schools: human-centred design of digital resources.

Q2 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics F1000Research Pub Date : 2024-09-04 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.12688/f1000research.132580.3
Sarah Rosenbaum, Jenny Moberg, Faith Chesire, Michael Mugisha, Ronald Ssenyonga, Marlyn A Ochieng, Clarisse Marie Claudine Simbi, Esther Nakyejwe, Benson Ngatia, Gabriel Rada, Juan Vásquez-Laval, José Damián Garrido, Grace Baguma, Sam Kuloba, Edward Sebukyu, Richard Kabanda, Irene Mwenyango, Tonny Muzaale, Pamela Nandi, Jane Njue, Cyril Oyuga, Florian Rutiyomba, Felecien Rugengamanzi, Joan Murungi, Allen Nsangi, Daniel Semakula, Margaret Kaseje, Nelson Sewankambo, Laetitia Nyirazinyoye, Simon Lewin, Andrew D Oxman, Matt Oxman
{"title":"Teaching critical thinking about health information and choices in secondary schools: human-centred design of digital resources.","authors":"Sarah Rosenbaum, Jenny Moberg, Faith Chesire, Michael Mugisha, Ronald Ssenyonga, Marlyn A Ochieng, Clarisse Marie Claudine Simbi, Esther Nakyejwe, Benson Ngatia, Gabriel Rada, Juan Vásquez-Laval, José Damián Garrido, Grace Baguma, Sam Kuloba, Edward Sebukyu, Richard Kabanda, Irene Mwenyango, Tonny Muzaale, Pamela Nandi, Jane Njue, Cyril Oyuga, Florian Rutiyomba, Felecien Rugengamanzi, Joan Murungi, Allen Nsangi, Daniel Semakula, Margaret Kaseje, Nelson Sewankambo, Laetitia Nyirazinyoye, Simon Lewin, Andrew D Oxman, Matt Oxman","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.132580.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Learning to thinking critically about health information and choices can protect people from unnecessary suffering, harm, and resource waste. Earlier work revealed that children can learn these skills, but printing costs and curricula compatibility remain important barriers to school implementation. We aimed to develop a set of digital learning resources for students to think critically about health that were suitable for use in Kenyan, Rwandan, and Ugandan secondary schools.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted work in two phases collaborating with teachers, students, schools, and national curriculum development offices using a human-centred design approach. First, we conducted context analyses and an overview of teaching strategies, prioritised content and collected examples. Next, we developed lessons and guidance iteratively, informed by data from user-testing, individual and group interviews, and school pilots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Final resources include online lesson plans, teachers' guide, and extra resources, with lesson plans in two modes, for use in a classroom equipped with a blackboard/flip-chart and a projector. The resources are accessible offline for use when electricity or Internet is lacking. Teachers preferred the projector mode, as it provided structure and a focal point for class attention. Feedback was largely positive, with teachers and students appreciating the learning and experiencing it as relevant. Four main challenges included time to teach lessons; incorrect comprehension; identifying suitable examples; and technical, logistical, and behavioural challenges with a student-computer mode that we piloted. We resolved challenges by simplifying and combining lessons; increasing opportunities for review and assessment; developing teacher training materials, creating a searchable set of examples; and deactivating the student-computer mode.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using a human-centred design approach, we created digital resources for teaching secondary school students to think critically about health actions and for training teachers. Be smart about your health resources are open access and can be translated or adapted to other settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12260,"journal":{"name":"F1000Research","volume":"12 ","pages":"481"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11377934/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F1000Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.132580.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Learning to thinking critically about health information and choices can protect people from unnecessary suffering, harm, and resource waste. Earlier work revealed that children can learn these skills, but printing costs and curricula compatibility remain important barriers to school implementation. We aimed to develop a set of digital learning resources for students to think critically about health that were suitable for use in Kenyan, Rwandan, and Ugandan secondary schools.

Methods: We conducted work in two phases collaborating with teachers, students, schools, and national curriculum development offices using a human-centred design approach. First, we conducted context analyses and an overview of teaching strategies, prioritised content and collected examples. Next, we developed lessons and guidance iteratively, informed by data from user-testing, individual and group interviews, and school pilots.

Results: Final resources include online lesson plans, teachers' guide, and extra resources, with lesson plans in two modes, for use in a classroom equipped with a blackboard/flip-chart and a projector. The resources are accessible offline for use when electricity or Internet is lacking. Teachers preferred the projector mode, as it provided structure and a focal point for class attention. Feedback was largely positive, with teachers and students appreciating the learning and experiencing it as relevant. Four main challenges included time to teach lessons; incorrect comprehension; identifying suitable examples; and technical, logistical, and behavioural challenges with a student-computer mode that we piloted. We resolved challenges by simplifying and combining lessons; increasing opportunities for review and assessment; developing teacher training materials, creating a searchable set of examples; and deactivating the student-computer mode.

Conclusion: Using a human-centred design approach, we created digital resources for teaching secondary school students to think critically about health actions and for training teachers. Be smart about your health resources are open access and can be translated or adapted to other settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在中学教授有关健康信息和选择的批判性思维:以人为本的数字资源设计。
背景:学会批判性地思考健康信息和选择可以保护人们免受不必要的痛苦、伤害和资源浪费。早期的工作表明,儿童可以学习这些技能,但印刷成本和课程兼容性仍然是学校实施的重要障碍。我们的目标是开发一套适合肯尼亚、卢旺达和乌干达中学使用的数字学习资源,让学生对健康问题进行批判性思考:我们采用以人为本的设计方法,与教师、学生、学校和国家课程开发办公室合作,分两个阶段开展工作。首先,我们进行了背景分析和教学策略概述,确定了优先内容并收集了范例。接下来,我们根据用户测试、个人和小组访谈以及学校试点的数据,反复开发课程和指导:最终资源包括在线教案、教师指南和额外资源,教案有两种模式,可在配有黑板/平面图和投影仪的教室中使用。这些资源可以离线访问,以便在缺电或缺乏互联网时使用。教师更喜欢投影仪模式,因为它提供了结构和课堂注意力的焦点。反馈基本上是积极的,教师和学生都赞赏这种学习方式,并认为它很实用。四个主要挑战包括:授课时间;不正确的理解;确定合适的例子;以及我们试行的学生电脑模式在技术、后勤和行为方面的挑战。我们通过简化和合并课程、增加复习和评估机会、编写教师培训材料、创建可搜索的示例集以及停用学生计算机模式等方法解决了这些难题:利用以人为本的设计方法,我们创建了数字资源,用于指导中学生对健康行动进行批判性思考,并用于培训教师。明智对待你的健康》资源是开放式的,可以翻译或改编用于其他环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
F1000Research
F1000Research Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1646
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: F1000Research publishes articles and other research outputs reporting basic scientific, scholarly, translational and clinical research across the physical and life sciences, engineering, medicine, social sciences and humanities. F1000Research is a scholarly publication platform set up for the scientific, scholarly and medical research community; each article has at least one author who is a qualified researcher, scholar or clinician actively working in their speciality and who has made a key contribution to the article. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research is suitable irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; we welcome confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies. F1000Research publishes different type of research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others. Reviews and Opinion articles providing a balanced and comprehensive overview of the latest discoveries in a particular field, or presenting a personal perspective on recent developments, are also welcome. See the full list of article types we accept for more information.
期刊最新文献
Household resilience of women migrant worker sellers of Jamu Gendong. Identification of compounds from natural Peruvian sources as potential inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro mutations by virtual screening and computational simulations. Clust&See3.0 : clustering, module exploration and annotation. Health care workers hospitalized for COVID-19 in Liberia: who were they, and what were their outcomes? Post-pubertal management of undescended testes from the malignancy risk point of view: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1