NIRS-IVUS Assessment of OCT-Derived Healed Coronary Plaques.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis Pub Date : 2024-09-07 DOI:10.5551/jat.64781
Kosei Terada, Takashi Kubo, Amir Kh M Khalifa, Wei-Ting Wang, Suwako Fujita, Ryan D Madder
{"title":"NIRS-IVUS Assessment of OCT-Derived Healed Coronary Plaques.","authors":"Kosei Terada, Takashi Kubo, Amir Kh M Khalifa, Wei-Ting Wang, Suwako Fujita, Ryan D Madder","doi":"10.5551/jat.64781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Healed plaque (HP) is associated with rapid plaque growth and luminal narrowing. Thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) is recognized as a precursor lesion to plaque rupture. The aim of the present study was to compare the lipid size among optical coherence tomography (OCT)-derived HP, TCFA, and thick-cap fibroatheroma (ThCFA) using near-infrared spectroscopy-intravascular ultrasound (NIRS-IVUS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present study included 173 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. Non-culprit lesions with angiographically intermediate stenosis were assessed by both OCT and NIRS-IVUS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The frequency of TCFA, HP, and ThCFA was 35 (20%), 53 (30%), and 85 (49%), respectively. Minimum lumen area was not significantly different between TCFA and HP, but was smaller in TCFA and HP than in ThCFA (4.6 [interquartile range {IQR}: 3.5-6.4] mm<sup>2</sup> vs. 4.3 [3.4-5.3] mm<sup>2</sup> vs. 6.5 [4.8-8.6] mm<sup>2</sup>, P<0.001). Plaque burden was not significantly different between TCFA and HP, but was larger in TCFA and HP than in ThCFA (72 [IQR: 66-80] % vs. 75 [67-80] % vs. 62 [54-69] %, P<0.001). Maximum lipid core burden index in 4mm (maxLCBI<sub>4mm</sub>) was largest in TCFA, followed by HP and ThCFA (493 [IQR: 443-606] vs. 446 [347-520] vs. 231 [161-302], P<0.001). The frequency of lipid rich plaque with maxLCBI<sub>4mm</sub> >400 was highest in TCFA, followed by HP and ThCFA (89% vs. 60% vs. 7%, P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on NIRS-IVUS findings, non-culprit coronary HP in AMI was associated with vulnerable plaque characteristics, but not as much as TCFA.</p>","PeriodicalId":15128,"journal":{"name":"Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5551/jat.64781","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Healed plaque (HP) is associated with rapid plaque growth and luminal narrowing. Thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) is recognized as a precursor lesion to plaque rupture. The aim of the present study was to compare the lipid size among optical coherence tomography (OCT)-derived HP, TCFA, and thick-cap fibroatheroma (ThCFA) using near-infrared spectroscopy-intravascular ultrasound (NIRS-IVUS).

Methods: The present study included 173 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. Non-culprit lesions with angiographically intermediate stenosis were assessed by both OCT and NIRS-IVUS.

Results: The frequency of TCFA, HP, and ThCFA was 35 (20%), 53 (30%), and 85 (49%), respectively. Minimum lumen area was not significantly different between TCFA and HP, but was smaller in TCFA and HP than in ThCFA (4.6 [interquartile range {IQR}: 3.5-6.4] mm2 vs. 4.3 [3.4-5.3] mm2 vs. 6.5 [4.8-8.6] mm2, P<0.001). Plaque burden was not significantly different between TCFA and HP, but was larger in TCFA and HP than in ThCFA (72 [IQR: 66-80] % vs. 75 [67-80] % vs. 62 [54-69] %, P<0.001). Maximum lipid core burden index in 4mm (maxLCBI4mm) was largest in TCFA, followed by HP and ThCFA (493 [IQR: 443-606] vs. 446 [347-520] vs. 231 [161-302], P<0.001). The frequency of lipid rich plaque with maxLCBI4mm >400 was highest in TCFA, followed by HP and ThCFA (89% vs. 60% vs. 7%, P<0.001).

Conclusions: Based on NIRS-IVUS findings, non-culprit coronary HP in AMI was associated with vulnerable plaque characteristics, but not as much as TCFA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对 OCT 导出的愈合冠状动脉斑块进行 NIRS-IVUS 评估。
目的:愈合斑块(HP)与斑块快速生长和管腔狭窄有关。薄帽纤维血管瘤(TCFA)被认为是斑块破裂的前兆病变。本研究旨在使用近红外光谱血管内超声(NIRS-IVUS)比较光学相干断层扫描(OCT)得出的 HP、TCFA 和厚盖纤维斑块(ThCFA)的脂质大小:本研究纳入了173名接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者。通过 OCT 和 NIRS-IVUS 对血管造影中度狭窄的非冠状动脉病变进行评估:结果:TCFA、HP 和 ThCFA 的发生率分别为 35(20%)、53(30%)和 85(49%)。TCFA和HP的最小管腔面积无明显差异,但TCFA和HP的最小管腔面积小于ThCFA(4.6 [四分位间范围{IQR}:3.5-6.4] mm2 vs. 4.3 [3.4-5.3] mm2 vs. 6.5 [4.8-8.6] mm2,P<0.001)。TCFA和HP的斑块负荷无明显差异,但TCFA和HP的斑块负荷大于ThCFA(72 [IQR: 66-80] % vs. 75 [67-80] % vs. 62 [54-69] %,P<0.001)。TCFA 的 4mm 最大脂质核心负荷指数(maxLCBI4mm)最大,其次是 HP 和 ThCFA(493 [IQR: 443-606] vs. 446 [347-520] vs. 231 [161-302],P<0.001)。在TCFA中,maxLCBI4mm>400的富脂斑块频率最高,其次是HP和ThCFA(89% vs. 60% vs. 7%,P<0.001):结论:根据 NIRS-IVUS 的研究结果,AMI 非冠状动脉 HP 与易损斑块特征相关,但不如 TCFA 相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
15.90%
发文量
271
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: JAT publishes articles focused on all aspects of research on atherosclerosis, vascular biology, thrombosis, lipid and metabolism.
期刊最新文献
Action Required to Maximize Protection against Ischemic Stroke among Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. Can Large Language Models Help Healthcare? Impact of Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential on the Long-Term Risk of Recurrent Stroke in Patients with a High Atherosclerotic Burden. Atherosclerotic Diseases in Chronic Kidney Disease. Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol for Secondary Prevention after Minor Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1